From Where do Individual Rights Originate?

@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
October 29, 2008 11:46pm CST
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security." ~The US Declaration of Independence Too many people think that our rights are granted us by our Government. Others think that it is the US Constitution that grants us our individual rights. Still others say that right derive from We the People... But we need go no further than the Declaration of Independence to learn where our rights originate. They aren't granted by anyone, nor are they the product of ink and parchment. They aren't the result of popular opinion or mandates from the masses. They are ours because we our human beings, they are the birthright we enjoy from our creator. The US Constitution does not grant rights to We the People, in fact, the US Constitution is not addressed to We the People at all. It is a letter (of sorts) from We the People, to the Federal Government. It is an acknowledgement that there are certain authorities and responsibilities that we much relinquish to government officials in order to carry out the duties of their assignments. The Declaration of Independence defines The United States of America. It tells the world what it means to be an American, and what the United States of America hopes to accomplish as a nation. On the other hand, it does not define what it means to be an American, nor does it tell us what we can and can't do. We can't hope to achieve the goals of the United States of America if we try under the delusion that We the People are the arbitors of rights. That is what brought us attrocities like legal slavery, denial of suffrage to women and some minorities, crimes against the tribes and even the Mormon Extermination Act of Missouri (just to name a few). If any of these acts were held to real Constitutional and Declaration of Independence scrutiny, none of them would have been allowed to happen. But more importantly, if the scoundrels who carried out the attrocities would have refused to deny someone else their inalienable rights, then the government officials would never have had the opportunity to legitimize or codify them at all. When we act, vote, or make demands on our government or each other... when we take someone to court, or call the police... when we petition for laws banning the activities of others we need to think about what we are doing. We need to remember who and from where our rights originate. If we think that they are merely the result of the whims of long dead White Guys, then we deserve to lose them. If we elect people who promise to take our rights away, then we not only deserve to lose all our rights, we have demanded it. Just something to remember November 4th.
4 people like this
4 responses
@tdavis (117)
• United States
30 Oct 08
Very good, finally someone got down to the bottom of the pile. One thing, the constitution is the box that contains our goverment. If you heard Obama's speech regarding the civil rights movement's view was too narrow and that he wanted the highest court in the land to ammend the constitution from the bench and state specifically what the goverment would be required to do for the people. He was very calm and articulate and made no bones about the redistribution of wealth. Sorry I spun out for a while. Really good job. Thanks.
2 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
30 Oct 08
Exactly. What Obama says he wants is incompetent Justices. In other words, he wants Supreme Court Justices who will refuse to honor their oath of office. Of course, Obama himself never once fulfilled his own oath of office, so what do we expect? He's just an incompetent boob who surrounds himself with other incompetent boobs.
1 person likes this
@xfahctor (14113)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
30 Oct 08
PSHEW! Right on fire this morning aren't you ted? GREAT piece of writing, really nice work. You have very well articulated what we are about and stand for as a nation and how the roll of government fits in to the lives of the people and the importance of limiting that roll and even more important, why it is limited and why we have these rights to begin with. I can't think of anything to add to it, nor would I even try to. May I have your permission to use this on my refederation movement group's myspace?
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
30 Oct 08
Sure, go ahead and use it... also, send me the link.
@xfahctor (14113)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
30 Oct 08
Will do, still working on the space, brand new yet, but you got it. http://www.myspace.com/nh_refederation_movement
@youdontsay (3497)
• United States
30 Oct 08
Well said!
@evanslf (484)
31 Oct 08
Hi Parated, a very nice piece indeed and a good reminder to us all of the importance that we should always attach to our individual rights. Sadly, I have noticed a trend amongst politicians, both Dem and Rep, and also politicians in other countries, to try to gradually reduce our rights for one reason or another, which always apparently seems expedient at the time. Call me a cynic, but I have come to the view that most politicians are in it for themselves, whether they be Dem or Rep, left or right, and that protecting our individual rights comes way down their list of priorities!