The never ending Minn. race
By lilwonders
@lilwonders456 (8214)
United States
January 5, 2009 9:37am CST
Well I saw on the news that the Minn. board is going to announce Al Franken as the winner. But that Coleman is not done yet. Both sides have laid the ground work for lawsuits (both have a TEAM of lawyers)and if Coleman files a lawsuit then this thing could drag out a lot longer. Is it just me or sense the whole Gore vs Bush court battle are more and more politicans taking the elections to the courts instead of the people? Is this a new trend? SHould it be? What needs to be done about this kind of situation?
1 person likes this
6 responses
@ZephyrSun (7381)
• United States
5 Jan 09
This race seems like it is going to go on forever lol I really think the people should decide on who they want to rep them. It really doesn't seem like a court issue and our courts are already so clogged it's crazy. Maybe soon this race will end and the people up there can get on with their life.
1 person likes this
@lilwonders456 (8214)
• United States
5 Jan 09
I know what you mean but it seems if a candidate does not like the outcome in a close race they just sue for the right to have the job. I find it annoying no matter which side is doing it.
2 people like this
@xfahctor (14113)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
9 Jan 09
Cripe, will this ever go away? I know I'm a bit late lil, sorry. Franken is a BAFOON and the thought of him in congress would be hillarous if it weren't so serious. but if thats really who Minnisota wants representing them, who am I to say. *shrug*

@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
10 Jan 09
Actually the election results showed that Coleman was Minnesota's choice. Franken is the canvassing board's choice. They padded his count while taking votes away from Coleman.
http://johnrlott.tripod.com/other/ColemansXs.html
http://johnrlott.tripod.com/other/FrankensXs.html
@lilwonders456 (8214)
• United States
10 Jan 09
Well Franken has won "they "say but he may not get the seat..... lawsuits by the opposing side are already being filed. I know what you mean though I can't imagine Franken as a decent politican but it is Minnisota's choice.

@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
6 Jan 09
There isn't an honest, honorable person in the US who should treat the comic genius turned political criminal with anything but contempt. He, and everyone else who rigs elections are the embodiment of the term "enemies at the gate".

@lilwonders456 (8214)
• United States
10 Jan 09
I have to admit I have a very hard time taking him seriously as a politican. But I guess a bunch of people in Minn. don't have a problem seeing it that way or the few that bought the election for him.

@anniepa (27955)
• United States
5 Jan 09
We need to come up with a method of voting and counting the votes that's as close to foolproof as it's possible it get. Whenever there's an election as close as this one there are going to be unhappy people, let's face it. There will always be allegations and accusations of wrongdoing and as long as there are lawyers there are going to be lawsuits. What we need is some kind of uniform election laws nationally and consistent standards for counting the votes and for what ballots get accepted and what ones are rejected. Like I said, when it's this close whichever side loses is going to be very angry and is likely to claim the election was stolen from them.
I don't know if it's a new trend or not. For this sort of thing to happen you first have to have a razor thin election, which this one certainly is.
Annie

@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
8 Jan 09
Annie, it isn't the closeness of the election that is the problem, it's the fact that so many ballots were "Found", some even with bogus dates on them. When packages of ballots are "found" and ever single one of them are for the same candidate...
It's the blatant evidence of criminal activity that proves there is a problem.
We don't need more centralization we need people to wake up and quit making excuses simply because the fraud is helping their guy win.
1 person likes this
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
5 Jan 09
There are just to many varieties of fools out there to make an election foolproof. To me, filling in a freaking circle seems like a simple task. To many morons, it's just so difficult that they bubble an area between circles, put an X through a circle, draw an arrow pointing to a circle, circle a circle, write a checkmark, etc. I just don't think you can make a handbook big enough to foolproof something with so many stupid voters.
1 person likes this
@lilwonders456 (8214)
• United States
5 Jan 09
I agree that we need a better way to do elections. But also we need candidates that will except the results. I do not who the people picked. The point is they did pick. SO therefore it should go to that candidate. Not to the judges.
As races get closer the courts seem to be the battlefield instead of the voting public.

@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
5 Jan 09
They should just throw this crap out and have a runoff election like they did in Georgia. I've heard people say that will cost taxpayer dollars. My answer to that is that we've now spent over 2 months worth of taxpayer dollars paying people to go through these ballots over and over again trying to determine who these people voted for. People in Georgia must be laughing at Minnesota since their runoff ended with a decisive vote that left no question who the winner was shortly after the original election.
@lilwonders456 (8214)
• United States
10 Jan 09
I think a run off would be good. Get it over with once and for all.
@iriscot (1289)
• United States
5 Jan 09
I saw the other day that Franken was leading by 50 votes now they say he is leading by 250 votes, so it looks like his lead is growing and I believe they said there were like 1500 votes to be counted. I don't know why it takes so long to count votes. The Supreme Court is a joke, they are appointed by the President who is in office. Right now and during the 2000 election it was controlled by a republican majority. So the vote is always slanted to the ruling party. Decisions don't seem to be made to benefit the person or cause that is right, they are made politically.






