Alan Keyes Now On The Bandwagon!!

Lilwonders, It sure seems like it would be the best fix. The more he tries to hide this, the more it looks like he has something big to hide!

Destiny, I agree totally! He is definitely hiding something although I am not sure it will be his citizenship. It will unfold to be something scandalous but I don't know if it will cost him the presidency.

Not qualified means just that... why do you think the Supreme Court is involved... hmmm? If his campaign is found to have been illegal, then it would go to the one who actually won... that being McCain.

Destiny, where in the Constitution does it address invalidating an election? There are no procedures for that nor are there any which automatically give the positions to the runners up.

I agree with you, Bob, that Pelosi would be the most likely candidate and that's something I wouldn't want to see happen either. Then again, Biden could appoint anyone he wanted to appoint. How many people had heard of Gerald Ford before Nixon appointed him as the V.P. after Agnew stepped down?

She would have less power as VP than as speaker of the house. Congress has more power than the VP or the president so ya it maybe a good idea.

Bobmnu, Although I don't know how constitutional law reads, I tend to agree with Destiny on this one and that being that since the office was obtained illegally, his election, and anyone who ran on the ticket would be void. If I go out and commit fraud to buy a house and get caught, are they going to let me keep the house or let my spouse keep it when she had to be complicit in the crime? I don't think so and I have to believe there are contingencies for this buried somewhere in our judicial system. If in fact this lie has been perpetrated on America, the ones who have to shoulder the blame will be the MSM and their total blind worship of him instead of vetting him as they did Palin and McCain and every other presidential candidate down through history.

Lilwonders: A parent cannot renouce US citizenship for their child and the US allows dual citizenship for that child until they are 18 and make their own decision to renounce their citizenship.

Irisheyes, Actually the law at the time of Obama's birth stated that the mother or father must have been a natural born citizen of the US and have resided in the US for at least 5 years AFTER their 18th birthday. Since she was not even 20 she would not have qualified under this statute and that being so, Barack would not qualify to be president.

Indonesia can't revoke US citizenship. But neither country recongizes dual citizenships. Infact Indonsia forbids it and will not grant citizenship to anyone unless they do revoke their citizenship to the other country. I did not know about this until I looked it up. THey have some of the toughest immigration and citizenship laws I have seen. They will not even allow for an adoption that could cause a dual citizenship. I do not know what they have against it. But these laws have been in place longer an Obama has been alive. So if he really did become a Indonesian citizen then there is a good chance his mother revoked his citizenship. It is all really murky and confusing and to the average person it would not mean a thing...but we are talking about the President of the united states and their are special laws in place for that job. But I do not know if all the rumors are true.Ifd he really is a natural citizen of this country. Heck I have heard that he was really born in Kenya and his mother lied on his birth certificate. Who knows. But I do think we need to find out.

No... I am saying Mr Keyes got sh.t for brain and he is betraying his people who have fought 40 years to achieve equality.

So you are saying Blacks can't think for themselves? That borders on being a racist statement.

Actually, all it takes is for the Supreme Court to rule that the 0bamunist was ineligible to run. The eligibility clause plainly states the requirements. If it is found that the 0bamunist ran and wasn't eligible, then it would void his campaign and subsequent win. Since there were only 4 points separating the candidates... it is not too much of a stretch to believe that the only remaining candidate would be declared the winner. The 0bamunist could have avoided all of this simply by providing the proof that he claims he has... instead, he hired several law firms in order to keep that information hidden.... including his school records and nearly everything else that holds any clues to his status. Now his attorneys are threatening everyone seeking the information that would either prove or disprove his eligibility. There is no privacy issue involved here at all... I had to provide a birth certificate for my last employer.... so there is no excuse for him not to provide that information to us... who are his employers.

No, Rodney, you misread my comment to Destiny. I have posted several times that the 25th Amendment very clearly states what steps would be taken if a sitting President is removed from office due to impeachment or resignation. Destiny's belief that the office would go to McCain by default is incorrect as there are no provisions for declaring a finalized election as invalid in the Constitution, just as there are no provisions for a Do Over. In order for either of those things to happen, a new Amendment would have be be written and voted on. My point was that since the Constitution already has valid steps in place, I don't believe that the Democrats would vote for a new Amendment giving the office to a Republican or and Amendment forcing the states to pay for another election. I would hope that all of our elected officials, both Republican and Democrat, would show some ethics if it is discovered that Obama was not qualified to run and would vote to impeach him.

No, it would not void his win. He could have been found ineligible *before* he won or even before he was sworn in but he's the President of the United States now and things don't work the way you're trying so hard to believe they do. The word is "impeachment", in which case he would be removed from office or forced to resign and Joe Biden would become the President. If you're so sure you're right, find where this is addressed in the Constitution and post it. Otherwise you're hanging onto a theory in the face of documented facts to the contrary.

That's great - thanks so much for sharing - I learned something new today!

The charge wouldn't be Treason. The Constitution, in Article III, defines treason against the United States "to consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid or comfort." The charge(s) would be election and/or campaign fraud...both of which are impeachable offenses. I don't agree that this would throw the country into a tailspin. There are set steps and procedures in our Constitution that would be taken up by both the House and the Senate, from an official inquiry by the House Judiciary Committee on up to and including an impeachment trial with the Senate sitting as the jury with the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court presiding over the trial. Both sides would have the ability to prsent their cases and their evidence and a determination would be made. If it is determined through this orderly process that Obama was ineligible to run and that he was aware of that fact, no one but the most diehard supporters would disagree that he cannot remain in office and should be impeached. There have been impeachment trials and impeachments of Presidents in the past and our Constitution held strong. I also believe that weeding out our own bad apples sends a message to the international communities that our country...and our Constitution...are strong and that our country will not implode because the rules, procedures and laws are so well written.