28 Days or 28 Weeks?

28 Weeks Later - The second installment in what looks to be an above average undead series.
@freak369 (5112)
United States
May 4, 2009 9:27am CST
Which one did you think was better? I've seen both and have to say that they are both good but each of them have their own perks. The zombies/ undead/ infected in both were realistic but come on, they moved way too fast. The special effects were good too but in 28 Weeks Later there was a lot more action and of course the military presence was a lot heavier. I wondered if the dad would ever die. Should be interesting to see if there will be another installment because they left the ending wide open for one. Maybe 28 Months Later ...
1 person likes this
2 responses
gitfiddleplayer
@gitfiddleplayer (10362)
• United States
6 May 09
I liked 28 days, it was better.
Galena
@Galena (9110)
•
4 May 09
hard to say. I thought the first half of days was very good, but it went downhill on reaching the army camp. whearas weeks was a more consistantly good film, overall, but not as good as the first half of the first one.