The Code
By Boboy2
@Boboy2 (62)
Philippines
October 12, 2009 11:37am CST
I appreciate Dan Brown the way he tried to connect one event with the other. He seemed to be mixing icecream with vinegar. Have you tried eating lasagna with pork and beans? Or, have you ever experienced riding a bike on top of a limousine? This is how I would allude Brown's personal perspective in takine some accounts in history. Tsk!
3 responses
@achilles2010 (3051)
• India
4 Apr 10
Dan Brown wanted to publish a book that would be a money spinner. He was successful in doing that. He wasn't however successful in writing a disparaging piece of writing on life of Jesus Christ.
@arvindnair (45)
• India
4 Apr 10
he cant be just dismissed as some one who is falsified jesus and tried to make money....he is just taken some accounts that exist and questioned the divinity of jesus, undoubetedly jesus was a great teacher and philospher and thinker of his times who was instrumental in bring about a revolution, but virgin birth, divinity of christ seems a bit far fetched dont you think??
@eileenleyva (27555)
• Philippines
15 Oct 09
Hi Boboy2, Dan Brown was really a page turner in Da Vinci Code. I was impelled to read the thriller because my teen-age daughter wanted to know what the hulla-balloo about the book was all about. Alas, the book was exciting all right, but only because Brown used the Lord Jesus as the focal point of the story. Brown's concoction of tourist destination's relation to ancient coincidences could truly be exciting. And the reader could get upbeat by something that could possibly be explanations to something he was just learning while reading a pocketbook. Sigh! Must Brown use God to produce a bestseller and make money? Ludlum and Grisham, Baldacci and King had come up with exciting plots that were worth reading. But they didn't have to falsify Jesus and attack the faith. Brown is nothing but a user for selfish ends. I could never appreciate him.
