Americans changing their minds on "foreign policy".

United States
December 3, 2009 1:40pm CST
In recent polls (and we know how reliable they are) are showing a big change in how most americans feel about "foreign policy". What was called "isloationism" in the last election and years by some is now becoming very popular. "Almost half, 49 percent, told the polling organization that the United States should "mind its own business" internationally and let other countries get along the best they can on their own, the Pew Research Center survey found. That's up from 30 percent who said that in December 2002." It is also the highest it has been in four decades according to them. If you want to read more on it you can go here: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091203/ap_on_re_us/us_american_isolation What do you think of the change in the American publics view on being involved with the rest of the world? Do you agree with this? What is causing it?
1 person likes this
4 responses
@Latrivia (2878)
• United States
3 Dec 09
Well, there's the economic decline, the change in leadership, and the monstrous national debt, to name a few. I think most of us tired of watching our tax dollars go to fund a military occupation with no near-future promise of ending. Not to mention the emotional toll it takes to watch our children, siblings, and friends come home in a flag draped coffin, or with pieces of themselves missing (physically and mentally).
1 person likes this
• United States
3 Dec 09
Plus the billions (yep with a B)of our tax dollars that our government gives away to other countries to try and help them out and all we get for it is to be hated and then they turn around and DEMAND, not even ask but DEMAND we give them more. They all whine they want us to give them more, more, more. But what about us? It is our money...it should be used for this country and helping our people.
1 person likes this
@MrNiceGuy (4139)
• United States
4 Dec 09
Im really not surprised at this. Whenever there are more problems at home there is always a pull away from the support of trying to do things overseas. After the wars and with our economic situation, its really not surprising. Unfortunately I do not think we can behave this way in regards to Iran forever.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
4 Dec 09
I think we've nearly come full-circle since the years before 9/11. Actually, I think we go through cycles regarding this issue depending on what's happening and what's been happening in the world. Of course, we didn't have nearly as many polls on as many issues even ten years ago as we have now so it might be hard to accurately track - even as accurate as polls are to begin with, right? I think many Americans have reached the point of "war-fatigue" after the past nine years. Right after 9/11 everyone was afraid and all fired up and gung-ho about getting Bin Laden and that feeling even got transferred by some to Saddam Hussein. I think the economy also has a lot to do with the poll results. When our economy was doing great people were less likely to protest that we need to "take care of our own first" since there weren't as many visible people of our own who needed help. As for what I think, I've always believed we should take care of Americans first and then help the rest of the world if we can. When it comes to war and especially "nation building" I've never been in favor of that policy. I realize there are times when war is necessary but I don't believe in the Bush Doctrine of preemptive war. I'm cautiously optimistic about Afghanistan right now; I'd have preferred if we could have just brought all of our troops home ASAP but I realize there are people who know a he11 of a lot more about it than I do. Annie
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
28 Jan 10
Thanks so much for the BR! Annie
• United States
4 Dec 09
I agree. I think it has a lot to due with our economy and the fact that the public is tired of the wars. When we are doing good we don't seem to mind giving away tons of money to other countries and meddling. But now that things are so bad here....we want to take care of our own first and I don't blame them. I feel that same way. We gave away enough money in foreign aid in the past 5 years that could have been used and completely pay for the problems with SSI AND pay for our social programs without raising taxes on ANYONE. Heck it would have even covered this new healthcare bill without raising taxes. We have given away tooo much in my opinion. It is time to take care us first. Then when we are ok again than we can see about helping everyone else out. As for the wars....they are just making things worse for us and running up more debt and the lose of more lives. I will sooo happy when they are over. Iraq never should have happened and I don't see Afghanstan as winable. I am almost at the point with that one to say we need to just cut our looses and leave.
1 person likes this
@Revan2009 (469)
3 Dec 09
It is not the average American citizens fault at all, for how the world now perceives America. The world (or some of it) believes America is greedy, arrogant, ignorant and paranoid about Muslim extremists. While it is true that parts of America can be classified as the bits I put in bold (as can all countries), the majority has done nothing more than their best to help the poor, vulnerable, and weak people in the world. In return they have received no thanks whatsoever, instead, the country that spends billions to support and help the poor was rather violently attacked. According to wikipedia, Al Qaeda believes that Christan and Jews are conspiring to destroy Islam; That is simply NOT true. However, it maybe perceived by some as they are. The US government maintains total support of Israel in their on going conflict over the Holy land of all three Abrahmic religions (Judaism, Christanity and Islma). Bin Laden was angered by the deployment of US troops to the "land of two Mosques". If the US declined to support the Saudi's during the first Gulf war Al Qaeda wouldn't have existed. Angry with the Saudi's and now the Americans Bin Laden left to Sudan, Afghanistan and Pakistan to wait for revenge. 9/11 was just the beginning of what Bin Laden wanted. Therefore I can understand why the US public now want to stop money being sent to such countries because they (Mid Easts) don't care how much the US sends they'll always hate the US troops are in the Middle East, regardless what the leaders and dictators of those countries say.
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
3 Dec 09
I agree with what you've said, but I want to add one thing to this. "paranoid about Muslim extremists" It's not paranoia if they really are out to get you.
@thea09 (18305)
• Greece
4 Dec 09
Good points Revan but don't forget that the troublemakers from the Arab countries were initally supported by the US along with others in the first place thus contributing to the situation. The likes of Bin Laden and Hussein were at one time better to the US than the percevied threats of Russia in Afghanistan, plus Iraq was the better side to support in the long on going Iran-Iraq war. Oh that would be oil interests again though.
1 person likes this
3 Dec 09
I agree, that's what I was saying. I'm saying it's the perception of paranoia the wars creates even though it's not true for the majority of Americans. Not sure about Cheney and Bush though... maybe they kinda were a bit.
1 person likes this