Finally something bipartisan!

@laglen (19759)
United States
March 17, 2010 7:33am CST
[i]http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35901626/ns/politics-capitol_hill/ WASHINGTON - The Senate on Tuesday easily killed a move by conservative Republicans to temporarily ban senators from earmarking spending bills with back-home projects like roads, water projects and grants to local governments. Fifteen Republicans joined with most Democrats in rejecting the moratorium on earmarks by a 68-29 vote. [/i] The reason being [i]Defenders of earmarks say they represent but a small portion of the overall budget, are a legitimate way for lawmakers to exercise Congress' power of the purse, and that they know the needs of their states better than agency bureaucrats. "We will have these decisions made by unelected bureaucrats in back rooms of agencies scattered all over this city," said Appropriations Committee Chairman Daniel Inouye, D-Hawaii. "I don't understand why those who are the most opposed to the policies of the current president are so intent on putting additional power into his hands and those who serve the executive branch." [/i] I believe it is their power in question. Who would give it up willingly?
1 person likes this
3 responses
@hofferp (4734)
• United States
18 Mar 10
I'd like to see the 15 Republicans get voted out of office along with all the Democrats that voted to kill the ban. What don't they understand about deficit spending?
@laglen (19759)
• United States
19 Mar 10
ALL incumbents must go!
@laglen (19759)
• United States
19 Mar 10
we could send an amtrak to pick them up. Goodness knows they arent being used for anything else.
@hofferp (4734)
• United States
19 Mar 10
Heck, why not? They all can go...
1 person likes this
@gewcew23 (8007)
• United States
17 Mar 10
Well that was expected, even the fifteen Republicans was no surprise to me. Back in 07 with a Senate controlled by the Democrats the three top porkers were all Republicans. Politicians love the power to spend someone else's money. I must be honest the power to be able to spend someone else's money must be intoxicating.
1 person likes this
@laglen (19759)
• United States
19 Mar 10
I am willing to try it! lol I just want the healthcare they have
@jb78000 (15139)
17 Mar 10
interesting. i was under the impression that both your major parties very much liked centralised power and decision making, i don;t know enough to say which, if either, more so. good for these ones voting against even more centralisation...
1 person likes this
@laglen (19759)
• United States
19 Mar 10
You are right on both of you. This is not a one party problem. It is like they get to Washington there IQs drop 100 points