Press Corr of Whiners

@laglen (19759)
United States
April 18, 2010 2:20pm CST
[i]http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0410/35944.html White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs met with a delegation from the White House press corps for 75 minutes on Thursday in an effort to improve frayed relations between the two sides. Ed Chen, a White House correspondent for Bloomberg News who is president of the White House Correspondents’ Association, said he asked for the meeting “to clear the air because in my 10-plus years at the White House, rarely have I sensed such a level of anger, which is wide and deep, among members over White House practices and attitude toward the press.” Chen said he feels “very good about the collegial give and take.” “We had a very good exchange with Robert,” Chen said. “He stayed overtime, and thus was late for his next meeting.” Gibbs said the meeting in his West Wing office was “comprehensive and productive.” “I started by thanking the WHCA on behalf of the president and first lady for protecting the privacy of the Obama children,” Gibbs said. “We discussed and made progress n a number of issues important to both.” Chen recalled that the two sides agreed on “no immediate global solutions,” but said he came away expecting an “improvement in press access.” Among the issues discussed: —More behind-the-scenes access for news photographers. Obama aides often post photos by White House staff photographers of scenes that in the past might have been recorded by a selected news photographer, or by the rotating “tight pool” of photographers that has more access than the general press. [b]—CNN’s Ed Henry, who represented the networks at the meeting, pushed for more bill signings and world leader meetings to be opened to cameras. —Journalists have complained of instances in which the White House declared a “full lid,” meaning no more scheduled releases or travel for the day, then later puts out a newsworthy release such as a readout of a presidential call with a world leader. A White House official told POLITICO: “We vowed to ensure that full lid violations were rare.” —Internet access on Air Force One is being explored. Currently, the White House staff has access to communications equipment. But except in extraordinary circumstances, such as a presidential trip to Iraq or Afghanistan, the press is not able to file while airborne. —On presidential trips, a rotating selection of about a dozen journalists (the pool) travels on Air Force One, while other news organizations (for instance, the other three networks) travel on a separate press charter arranged by the White House. Because of budget cutbacks, fewer news organizations are going on presidential trips, and many of those that do are sending fewer people. So more and more often, there has been too little to demand to make a press charter feasible. Reporters who are not in the pool, and want to cover the event, fly on their own. The White House warned the press delegation that this could mean a reduction in travel by aides relied on by reporters, including press officials and stenographers. [/b] The immediately precipitating event for the meeting was an April 10 incident in which President Barack Obama left the White House complex to attend one of daughter’s soccer games at 9:20 a.m., without being accompanied by the usual traveling press pool, which had been told to show up by 11:30 a.m. About fifteen minutes after his departure, press officials scrambled to assemble a partial pool that departed at 9:43 a.m. But the pool did not catch up, and the president got back to the White House 10 minutes before the reporters. At the time, Gibbs apologized to NBC News, the network assigned to the travel pool that day, and said it was an “unintentional … oversight” — a miscommunication between the president and his staff. During the meeting, Gibbs did not to promise that such an instance would never happen again, but pointed out it was the first time in 15 months, attendees said. Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0410/35944.html#ixzz0lTriqt7E[/i] there are a few issues I have here. We will go in order of what I made bold #1 That is great that Gibbs took the extra time to work with the press. Now the issues discusses: #1 legitimate, we shouldnt "count on" the WH to provide info. #2 I agree, more sunshine, more transparency - who can argue? #3 full lid violations, another piece of the transparency puzzle. #4 really? suck it up! This I found very disappointing, "my lush accommodations aren't lush enough? #5 again - they are lucky ANYBODY is allowed on that plane. Now regarding Obama's half hour "escape". Get over it, it is done, goodness sakes, the man needed a little alone time - I would/do too! I can not believe what a big deal they are making. I know there are security issues here, but holy crow, the press didnt get to see him for a half a stinkin hour? Am I being hypersensitive here or are my points here legit?
1 person likes this
4 responses
@gewcew23 (8007)
• United States
18 Apr 10
This is like trying to eat one of those 48 oz steaks, where do you start and how do you finish? What I am making out of this story is the media is wanting more coverage of Obama. Currently the White House is only allowing certain members of the press to cover the President, or am I mistaken? Well I am going to assume that I am right. If it was up to the press they would be able to cover everything, while if it was up to people like Gibbs the press would only cover what Gibbs wanted the press to cover. This is one of those thing that you just got to say okay.
3 people like this
@laglen (19759)
• United States
19 Apr 10
I understand the transparency and more access, but I think they are being awful demanding. This way so they dont have to work so hard?
2 people like this
@hofferp (4734)
• United States
19 Apr 10
I think the relationship between the press and the White House has been deteriorating slowly, but surely. To me the April 10 incident was just the straw that broke the camel's back...or so the press see it that way. Do I think it will get better? Temporarily, but then I think the White House will resort to it's non-transparency-mode it's accustomed to...and then there will be another "crisis".
2 people like this
@laglen (19759)
• United States
19 Apr 10
agreed, I think also it is good to keep the press on their toes. They should be getting the info not waiting for somebody to hand it to you. That is dangerous.
1 person likes this
@laglen (19759)
• United States
20 Apr 10
i know crazy huh? whoda thunk it!
@hofferp (4734)
• United States
19 Apr 10
The White House Press corp waiting for the news to be handed to them? Neah, just can't be... Have a great Monday, Laglen.
2 people like this
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
19 Apr 10
I think that this is not the first administration that has it's ups and downs with the press and it won't be the last. I do agree that the White House needs to be more inclusive when it comes to the press and that they need to put a stop to "full lid" violations. Since the news business is so competitive, anything the White House can do to assist with the swift filing of stories by the members of the press pool will go a long way towards making the working relationship work better. As far as the *incident* on the 10th., personally, I don't believe that the press should have been included in activities the president's children are involved in in the first place. The assumption that his security detail was not with him when he escaped is misplaced.
2 people like this
@laglen (19759)
• United States
19 Apr 10
I understand that the press needs to have access. I do not dispute that. I just thought their list of demands seemed a little off.
1 person likes this
@Fortunata (1135)
• United States
18 Apr 10
Gee, ya think the press should be upset? You darn right they had a right to be upset! They were played on the tenth of April. Ever been stood up by somebody who told you to meet them somewhere, at a certain time,and they didn't show up? Hmm? I don't buy that crap that the Prez needed 'time alone'. Give me a break! This is an adult man, not a two year old kid. I'm sick of people making excuses for this guy's mistakes and screw-ups. Old Bush had every name in the book thrown at him, and then some. His school records were even trashed and made fun of. Well, at least we knew where Bush went to school, and that he graduated. Bush's life is more of an open book than Obama's, whatever you think politically of both. Regarding security-if, God forbid, anything happened to Obama, and he didn't have Secret Service with him, then who's fault is that? Hmm? That was a stupid thing that he did.
2 people like this
@laglen (19759)
• United States
19 Apr 10
I agree about the comparison to Bush, but I really think people are getting ridiculous.
1 person likes this