No use with Sreesanth........

Yes it is sad that Sreesanth is failing to perform but we cant simply start to disregard his cricketing career. You do not know from what sort of backdrop they have risen from with constant will,determination and hard work. This is the sad fate of almost every sportsperson in our country.They have no support, so the risk which lies in entering the sports area is high.

If a bowler gives 100+ runs and took 3-4 wickets, then i think you will say he bowled very well. He gave very less runs and bowled also very well. The pitch and climate was not for the Fast bowlers. see Zaheer also took 1 wickets, which shows it was a flat track. Give him more chances, he will definetely perform, he is a good bowlers atleast better then no ball master Mr. Ishant. He is a useless fellow. Through him out of Indian team.

There is another innings and he has got another chance, but i don't think he could succeed anyway. He lost his form of wicket taking..He give more runs, but it would be accepted if he is taking some tickets, but batsman showed any fear or inconvenience with his bowling. He should have taken the wickets of tail end batsman to impress the selectors and the audience !!!

Yes it is true that Sreesanth is not effective in this test match. But I think it was necessary to play Sreesanth in the place of Ishant. Because as all of us know that Ishant was injured during first test match and their was no any bowlers except Sreesanth. So only one choice was Sreesanth.

Yes you are right but still we have got to give him more chance and try to support this guy.He got the chance to play after a long time so i just think its nerves. This guy has got talent and he has shown it so i really think he should get a last and final chance to prove himself