State and Local Employees are too important for this!

@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
February 16, 2011 7:47pm CST
Back in the 90s, the left celebrated as Clinton cut the U.S. military from 1,705,103 to 1,385,116 troops, NCOs and commissioned officers. The groups in Wisconsin who celebrated those cuts are now saying that state and local employees are too important to be part of state budget cuts. Tell me again how state employees are more important than our soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines?
2 responses
@ElicBxn (64169)
• United States
17 Feb 11
Ted, I'm a former State Slave, and while I agree that state employees should suffer just like the rest of the state, and I survived a number of "RIFTs" while I worked for the state, I do object with the whole notion that "Government workers" don't. I will grant that there were offices that had times of month/year when things were slow, but when the work came it, it was on a tight time line and those people were hard pressed to get it out in the time frame expected. Those people worked very hard for at least half the year, and needed every hand to do it, and those people had to be trained to do the job right, so some yahoo off the street couldn't come in as a temp and be able to do the job at all. I worked in several different offices, even departments, of the state, and everyone in those offices worked hard. Honestly, if the work hadn't come in for some reason - like severe weather one time - you would see us looking for things to do. I did data entry for 15 years. I had a fall that gave me a severe bruise on my left upper arm, and, believe it or not, typing was very painful. I went to the doc and he decided, with my tendency for inflammations, I shouldn't do the data entry for 10 days (rest of the current week and the next week.) Well, the other side of the office, had a back log of stuff to be filed, and letters to be written (couldn't do that) and mail that could be opened so the letters could be written. In 10 days I had wiped out the filing, opened the mail each day, purged the files (they turned out to be 2 years behind) and even started screening the forms that were to be data entered. The gal who managed the other side said that my efficiency surprised her because she had some temps coming in to do what I had done in 10 days and she had expected it to take 2 months! And it probably WOULD'VE taken them 2 months because were they experienced file clerks? (that's what I did before I got the job I had that turned into data entry.)
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
17 Feb 11
Yes, unfortunately, in the wars of words during times like this, the workers who do work get dumped on in the process. But when I see teachers taking the students to protests in the capital city just to pad the faces in the crowd (instead of actually teaching the kids). When I see state workers demanding higher taxes, just so they don't have to pay into their pensions. When I see laws passed banning "double dipping" for vets, but see teachers and administrators taking early retirement in one school district, only to land jobs in another... thus getting their pension, their paycheck AND their benefits for both working and retiring.. well... I have a hard time thinking there is any truth to their "being treated like slaves on the plantation" rhetoric.
1 person likes this
@ElicBxn (64169)
• United States
17 Feb 11
This is true too, but I'm a retired State Slave and I've got a little home health job to supplement what I get from retirement that only BARELY pulls me back up to what I was earning when I worked for the state.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
17 Feb 11
And I a retired Wisconsin Army National Guard NCO. While I did retire in 2002, I don't get my pension until I'm 60... if I live that long. The thing is, pensions were never meant to be the same as we earned when working. But somehow that got lost in the rhetoric. I'm glad you get to do something that brings you more income. Actually, in Wisconsin, many state and local workers actually make more than they did when working.
1 person likes this
@dragon54u (31633)
• United States
17 Feb 11
Public employees forget that they are working for the people and whatever the people want, that's what should happen. Public employees have it better than private sector workers and why should that be, when WE are the bosses?! I think everyone should have the opportunity to make a living wage but should not be a parasite. They are public servants and have no right to drain our coffers when we are in the red. They are treated better than our military, which should be a crime.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
17 Feb 11
No, the public employees consider their union leaders their bosses. The people are merely the sugar daddy.