Did we really land on the moon?

If the US did it why can't the UK,russia,china? As what you have said the moon's gravity is 1/6th that of the earth's so how come no problem was encountered during the first manned landing? 1/6th gravity is different than what we are used here so the space shuttle is designed to land only for earth's gravity, landing in a 1/6th that of the earth's gravity will surely cause certain problems or even damage their landing gear but why they landed perfectly? because it was all a hoax. And a distance of 356400 km back home is no kidding at all. That's around 9times the earths circumference. Can you think of an aircraft that could fly around the world 9 times without refueling? Now make it 18times without refueling since they can't refuel on moon of course.

You may have heard the Rivalry to get a man to the Moon was referred to as "The Space Race" between the USSR and the US...Once somebody made it,there was no point in the competition continuing to reach the same objective..being Second wasn't the Plan...It was Win only...As for the moon's Gravity effects on a Lander,How do you not get that 0.166 of the Earth's gravity force on the Lunar surface will put that much less stress on a vehicle landing there? The Fuel carried on those orbital vehicles (Have you seen the size of the Saturn V rocket boosters and their fuel tanks?) was enough to put the vehicles for the trip into orbit.. That was where most of the energy from the fuel went,in getting out of the Earth's Gravity field..once out of orbit,the craft were effectively weightless,so used relatively little fuel to push them into Lunar orbit...They weren't aircraft that need fuel every second to stay up for the entire flight..they didn't burn fuel all the way there,burn more going round in circles,then burn more all the way back ..they accelerated to escape velocity, then used orbital mechanics calculations to use the moon's gravity to pull them into orbit there...then broke free of the moon's orbit and allowed the earth to draw them back for re-entry..if you want to make a comparison with another vehicle,try a Glider..it gets pulled up into the air,is set loose,then uses warm air currents to stay up as long as they can.. Gliders don't refuel either because they don't have engines..yet the record for staying up in a Glider is near 1100 km...Inter orbital craft are in freefall most of the Journey..they use fuel to start,decelerate,and change direction..they do NOT need fuel to keep going..read a physics book,look at Maglev trains,or hovercraft.

You can't compare a space shuttle to a glider. Why? Because you can't reach moon using a glider. Then think about this how will they launch the space shuttle from the moon since it has never been done before? You see there were no errors for the entire apollo program, but did you know that when US tried to launch their first satellite (to answer the soviet sputnik) was a failure? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanguard_(rocket)

"No matter how I explain it you still won't believe what i'm going to say." Unless you present solid and compelling evidence, you're right, I won't. "About the earth moon distance it's completely obvious that if you reach moon you can't go back to earth" "360,000km is no joke distance and a round trip 720,000km. Don't tell me they refueled on the moon." What is completely obvious is that you do not have even an elementary knowledge of the Appolo mission, space travel and other relevant disciplines involved. Why would fuel be a problem? The fuel carried was needed to get the capsule and lander module going. Once it is under way, there is no need to burn much fuel. Momentum keeps the craft moving forward once in zero gravity. The only fuel spent after is used to fire small short occasional bursts to keep the course correct and to lift the module back up off the moon. "We all know the moon has no air(vacuum) how come the flag was waving?" Old argument, repeatedly corrected time and time again. The only time it "waved" was when it was planted and was being jostled about and when ever someone brushed against it. there is not a single piece of video out there that shows the flag flapping and waving with out one of those to things happening. Show me something beside the same old arguments used for decades by hoax theorists such as "the flag waved", "wires are visible", the stars/no stars argument, the "shadows appear wrong" argument, and any of the other redundant arguments that have been solidly stamped out repeatedly over the years. Bring me something new and compelling. Also, if you are going to try and prove the moon landings as fake, you should at least have a very good working knowledge of the things you are trying to disprove. You should gain a good solid knowledge of any theory before you attempt to prove it wrong. If you don't even fully understand what you are trying to disprove, you cannot convincingly disprove it. I am going to give you a link. It is a science and tech forum. There is a conspiracy section with literally hundreds of threads attempting to do what you are attempting here. So far, not one of them has managed to do it and some of them are people with far more extensive knowledge than you have demonstrated here. I would give the threads a good read, I guaranty nearly anything you will bring here as evidence has already been dealt with there a good number of times. It might even change your mind. Here: http://www.bautforum.com/

And some advice. I would not attempt there what you attempted here. The rules of discussion there are very strict and follow a very rigid format. You will be asked very difficult questions and be required to "show your work" so to speak. For example, if you claim the craft could not carry enough fuel, you will be required to show the math work to demonstrate that (you may thank me for not asking you to do that in this thread). In addition, you would be asked to describe what your understanding of the fuel used, it's capabilities and it's limits. All of the above would be cursory requirements to prove the fuel type and amount would not have been sufficient.

No matter how I explain it you still won't believe what i'm going to say. About the earth moon distance it's completely obvious that if you reach moon you can't go back to earth 360,000km is no joke distance and a round trip 720,000km. Don't tell me they refueled on the moon. We all know the moon has no air(vacuum) how come the flag was waving? Because it's windy in area 51 where they really landed and take that hollywood shot.

If the US really landed on the moon China could do the same thing as early as 2005. Chinese space technology is higher now compare to that 60's US tech.

and did you ever wonder why 3 of them go to the moon, but... only 1 stepped to the moon's sandy crust... the other one yet the capsule landed but the crew inside of it never leaves the capsule... and the remaining parts which contains 1 crew never step down to the moon's crust but kept on rotating, or flying to the whole moon... the answer is..... because 3 of the astronauts are not so sure if they ever come back to earth alive... so the other astronaut doesnt land on the crust so that if those 2 astronauts stagnant or trapped at the moon's surface crust, he can still come back to earth alive.... the other astronaut actually his ship lands but never leave his ship to step moon's crust because he's not so sure if he get killed on the moon's surface, something like a quicksand, tarpits, marsh, etc.... but the other astronaut really dont care at all, he step to the moon's surface crust and doesn't care if he can go back to the mother ship that rotating above moon...

wow quicksand? mothership? where did you get those words? quicksand on the moon? Are you kidding? Mothership? You're a starwars fan aren't you? Try to research more. Instead of jumping into conclusions why not pay attention first.

Yeah the true fake is the manned lunar landing that is.

are there any links that it is area 51? i want proof, seems so interesting....

and why is it that there are an existence of an american flag in the moon, as well as an existence of flag also in area 51.... and if armstrong's company never put there, then who put that american flag therein the moon? it is the Soviets?

Have you been on the moon? The american flag on the moon's crust? You speak like you really saw it. That's area 51 in nevada dessert not the moon.

$40 billion income???? an addition income to their country... then it's like a 3 hits in a one strike.... hahahaha.....

or... seven at one blow

Because the lunar landing was a big joke. It was a $40b hollywood movie in area 51 did you know that?

Even in 2020 the US can't go there. No more manned lunar landing was made from 1973-present because other countries has the technology necessary to trace the US space shuttle. Because they don't go to the moon anyway, there's a shortcut in area 51.