When the EPA meets moma bear with no gun

@debrakcarey (19887)
United States
June 2, 2012 12:36pm CST
http://www.redstate.com/vladimir/2012/06/02/seriously-sierra-club/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter For most of my adult life I have been what I thought was an enviromentalist. I love the outdoors and I am all about less chemicals in our lives, natual food when possible, a champion for animal conservation programs. But in the mid eighties I realized the EPA was not about common sense and good stewardship. I canceled all my 'sierra club' mags and did what I already knew how to do. Conserved nature. Here's a question for you; what will all the 'envoiro' greenies from LA and Aspen do when the economy crashes and they actually have to LIVE OFF the real enviroment that they really really have no idea of? things like hunting? nope, barbarian. finding shelter, nope, don't touch that tree for fire wood or shelter! You get my meaning on this?
3 responses
@peavey (16936)
• United States
2 Jun 12
Yep, got your meaning! I have wondered the same thing. "Naive" and "impractical" are good descriptions of the attitudes of many so-called environmentalists. Bleeding hearts and all, the EPA doesn't connect with reality. Like you, I used to think of myself as being an environmentalist, but what I am has nothing to do with Sierra Clubs or EPA or whatever else they call themselves. I have found myself weeping at the destruction of a forest or a natural meadow, and I feel so blessed to hear a meadow lark or a red wing blackbird, but I know how to cut up a deer and I know how to build a fire from real tree wood. It's a different concept and I don't know what you call it.
• United States
2 Jun 12
Disillusion is the word you are looking for.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
2 Jun 12
Don't you know if you cut up a tree to keep warm, the lawyers of the enviromentalists can sue you on behalf of the tree? lol Now, I am all for conservation, I'd not like to see a RedWood cut down unless it was sick or diseased. I'm a sort of Ted Nugent type. If you're familiar with him. Here's a link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7D6ZnSmZ0Ts
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
2 Jun 12
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nhf12BFBYXc&feature=related
@sierras236 (2739)
• United States
2 Jun 12
Clive Clussler had written a book. It was one of his Dirk series. I can't remember the name of it at the moment. But at the end, Dirk released a bunch of environmentalists in the jungle w/o any survival gear. Quite a fitting end for them. Your discussion reminded me of that story. It is funny that these EPA people never realize that nature is a very harsh mistress and doesn't play favorites.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
2 Jun 12
I love Clive Clussler novels! What is the name of that one? I've not read it. Only read one so far and it was great! Yeah, those cute little cuddly polar bear pups love fresh meat and grow up to be tow ton, 12 ft. tall meat eating machines. lol Nature is unforgiving. YOu either understand her, or you stay at home. Nice and safe with your modern conveniences.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
2 Jun 12
*two ton...lol
@blummus (451)
• United States
3 Jun 12
Stupidity should, and generally does, hurt. Situational awareness and knowing how to survive and keep going are important skills now that will become vital in the world our kids are inheriting because, frankly, what we have now in the US cannot hold together in the longer term. Whether we like the term global climate change or not, the fact is the world's weather is showing more and more frequent signs of being messed up. The weather patterns we've grown up with have slipped, with muc of the Midwest suffering from record heat and drought while areas like the usually-overheated Central Valley of California is wetter and cooler than the Midwest is historically and it's likely to stay that way. Sadly, the EPA is a political body, and it has been for a long time, if not since its creation. The moves that needed to be made thirty years ago were not made, and we and our kids will be playing catch-up for the rest of this century, at least. You might have a look at a book written by Mark Hertsgaard called _Hot: Living through the next fifty years on Earth_. Hertsgaard is a journalist who has been writing on the environment and the effects of its changes on people for more than 20 years. It's not airy-fairy stuff, nor is it chart-heavy; Hertsgaard has a daughter who will be living through this along with the rest of us, and his drive to understand the plain, practical truth makes Hot a serious book but one not without hope.
@debrakcarey (19887)
• United States
4 Jun 12
You are right, it is political, and to try and force America and Europe to pay the price for it is just not practical, it reeks of anti colonialism. A lot of political mistakes have been made all round, not just by the western world. China is # 1 in polluting, yet the carbon tax paid by the west would go towards increasing their economy and robbing ours. We seem to swing from one extreme to the other. Why can't we find the happy medium. My other problem with the global climate change crowd is blaming it entirely on man and civilization, industry. The concensus is that if we change man's habits all will be well. That is not entirely true. There is also evidence we are going through a cycle involving the sun AND the magnetic field of the earth itself. Like my friend up who responded up above, I respect the earth but I will not worship it. I believe in good stewardship, not punishment for being civilized.