the maths lesson

United Kingdom
September 27, 2016 9:58am CST
My stomach is rumbling and I'm in a silent classroom. The room is silent because the students are busy partaking in the joy of a mock non-calculator maths exam. Their faces are lit up with happiness and their eyes shine bright with the anticipation of numbers, protractors, compasses and formulae. This paper, and another in a few weeks, will determine whether they can resit their maths exam in November, or if they have to retake it in the distant future of June. They don't want to be here. They came here to study Travel and Tourism, Hair and Beauty or Hospitality. The government insists that the failure of achieving at least a grade C in GCSE maths and English is NOT an option and therefore they must resit them at college. Fail again? Try again. There are a surprising amount of dead horses being flogged in colleges up and down the land. I do feel for them. Of course maths and English are important, but telling people they're failures because they passed an exam but didn't get a high enough grade is absolutely bonkers. Some will achieve their C grade in November. Others in June. Still more will 'fail' again, by only achieving a D again. And if those students continue to study they will have to do maths again. And they may only achieve a D again. Because that's all they're capable of at this moment in time; that's their limit, their full mathematical potential. But we keep plodding on and plodding on, flogging the dead horse and keeping our fingers tightly crossed despite knowing it will make no difference. And if it {Oh, Hallelujah!} does make a difference it will be conveniently forgotten as the brain decides it isn't information which is needed anymore. Which sort of defeats the object, doesn't it? The clock is ticking.
2 people like this
4 responses
@WorDazza (15826)
• Manchester, England
27 Sep 16
I'm all for a basic level of numeracy being achieved by everyone but don't think a GCSE grade C is it. There's a lot of stuff in GCSE maths that the vast majority of people will never come across again in their lives. A basic numeracy test should be sufficient. Mental arithmetic and using a calculator (probably on a phone) to do adding, subtracting, multiplication, long division, fractions and percentages should get 90% of people through 90% of mathematical situations they will ever come across in their lifetime..
2 people like this
@WorDazza (15826)
• Manchester, England
28 Sep 16
@Poppylicious I still have nightmares about complex numbers. When I was at University I had to do the first year of the maths degree course as a pre-requisite for continuing on to the 2nd year of the Computer Science course due to its supposed high mathematical content. I struggled desperately, particularly when it came to complex numbers and, with a huge amount of hard work, scraped through with a minimum pass. Mathematical content of the remaining 2 years of my Computer Science degree? Virtually nil. I wasn't happy!!!
• United Kingdom
27 Sep 16
Precisely. I was never taught long division and have never needed it. Or, if I have unknowingly needed it I've obviously adapted and worked it out another way.
1 person likes this
@amadeo (111937)
• United States
27 Sep 16
Math was not my good subject.I was fine till I hit algebra and so forth.I flunk
1 person likes this
@amadeo (111937)
• United States
28 Sep 16
@Poppylicious the basic I like.It was the geometry that foul me up.
1 person likes this
• United Kingdom
27 Sep 16
I can do basic algebra, but easily get muddled by it!
• United Kingdom
28 Sep 16
@amadeo If you asked me to actually explain geometry I wouldn't have a clue what to say!
@ricki_911 (21625)
• Toronto, Ontario
27 Sep 16
Who is excited for school
1 person likes this
• United Kingdom
27 Sep 16
I used to love school, hate exams and work and classes ... :)
@xFiacre (14782)
• Ireland
27 Sep 16
@poppylicious My brother failed his maths O level I don't know how many times, still can't count and is an accountant.
1 person likes this
• United Kingdom
27 Sep 16
Honestly? Brilliant!
1 person likes this
@xFiacre (14782)
• Ireland
28 Sep 16
@Poppylicious Yes, he insists that accountants just need to know what columns the numbers go in and the calculators do the rest.
2 people like this
• United Kingdom
28 Sep 16
@xFiacre That makes perfect sense. :)