Is it Ober for Uber?
By Winterishere
@thedevilinme (5217)
Northampton, England
December 21, 2017 5:25am CST
Uber have just been judged to be a taxi company in the eyes of European law and will now have to get all the appropriate licences to operate. They have appealed and it will take some time for that to change as they see themselves as a Technology Company and so don’t agree, a so-called interrupter, a business opportunity to scrape money off the top and bottom of a traditional industry that modern technology can interfere with and so profit from. In the old days if you got an official yellow cab in New York or a Black cab in London you would pay top dollar, just because you always had. Uber piled in and slashed prices with their app as people could override the traditional methods of hailing cabs and get 30-40% cheaper fares.
In London and around the world those traditional cabbies are angry they are losing their jobs to Uber drivers, especially in London. Uber needs thousands of drivers to make its system work and with immigration as unmetered as a black cab fare it has made those drivers available, and to work for minimum wage, the profit line for Uber. With a £15 black cab fare now £5 with an Uber driver it’s no competition. The people love the company as its dirt cheap but the cabbies can’t accept change. It’s a race to the bottom around the world.
Black cab drivers in London have to do ‘The Knowledge’ to earn the official qualifications to drive the more lucrative and profitable black cabs. The Knowledge is pretty much learning every street in London so you can take any fare, anywhere. But with the arrival of Satnav the knowledge had lost its reason and Uber moved in. The Knowledge was why black cabbies were paid more but now their day has passed. Everything else is subject to economics and change through technology so why not a cab ride? Let’s face it; it was a rip off before, a way to fleece tourists who don’t know the city. For once I agree with European law.
4 people like this
3 responses
@FourWalls (86575)
• United States
21 Dec 17
Love your headline ("Is it Ober for Uber?"). Very witty.
I know a lot of taxi companies have protested Uber and Lyft here in America because the taxi companies have all of these regulations they have to endure, while there are no such restrictions (e.g., taxi license, business taxes, etc.) on an Uber/Lyft driver. The prices are lower because they don't have to deal with all the cost piled on to the "taxi" industry.
Maybe this will get people to look at how "necessary" all those regulations, with their surcharges that are passed on to the customer, really are.
2 people like this
@LadyDuck (502148)
• Italy
21 Dec 17
In Italy taxi drivers paid a lot of money for their license, they were surely not happy when Uber came and they had unfair competition. The law is unfair, if they allow Uber to make business without paying a license, the Government should reimburse what the taxi drivers paid for their license. It's the only way they can lower their fares.
2 people like this
@topffer (42155)
• France
21 Dec 17
A state law could decide that, they need a kind of cab licence in France since 2016. I suppose that the end of these cab internet companies is not far in France : last week a Uber competitor, LeCab, has been considered by an Appeal Court like a regular employer having to pay wages and social charges for its drivers, and sentenced to pay 51 000 Euros to a previous driver. The company has decided to go to the Cassation Court, although our Cassation Court will certainly not modify this decision as our lower courts have a sovereign power when it comes to appreciate a case. All they will win is about 1 year of more activity. Several Uber drivers have decided to sue Uber to obtain the same status.
The European court telling that Uber could not be considered like a simple intermediary between a driver and a client, opens the doors to the same decisions than in France in all the EU.





