Will the West EVER act on Syria?
By Winterishere
@thedevilinme (5216)
Northampton, England
April 9, 2018 6:06pm CST
Very smart play by Putin today. If he wanted to help Assad accelerate another victory in Syria by using chemical weapons then this was the time to do it. After Prime Minster May reunited Europe against Putin in response for the Salisbury nerve agent attack - which, apparently, has cost no lives as father and daughter are getting better now - would Europe be as united against nerve agents used on women and children in Syria? Well Putin has called Europe and Americas bluff again and done exactly that and I have no doubt we will do nothing. He will win this one and will turn around and say the UK doesn’t value Syrian lives. Did May fall into a trap here?
We know chemical attacks turn the war in Syria. In 2013 the word and the UN got together to figure a way of chickening out in getting involved in the growing Syria war, mostly for political reasons as nerve agents were being used in Syria, Obama’s so called red Line. Prime Minister David Cameron was particularly devious. He publicly backed action in Syria but asked for a vote in parliament on it, secretly wanting it to fail so he did not have to risk the next election while at war. Labor duly backed down from voting for the war and the vote was lost, making Labor look like the villains. Cameron did not need to ask the House and could have just acted. He chose to contrive not to and five years later war still wages and thousands upon thousands have died.
Secretly the West are not too bothered about Assad winning back his country and wish this would just get done but Islamic State complicated things and now it’s a hotspot for potential world war. Trump needs a distraction from a Stripper called Stormy and so may chose to fling some token out of date munitions at Syrian forces but we aint going to act to stop chemical attacks in my lifetime
5 people like this
4 responses
@LadyDuck (502189)
• Italy
10 Apr 18
Every time the west came to (let's say) help to remove a dictator in that area things went worst. To remove Assad and leave the Syria alone immediately after serves no purpose. Look at Iran, Iraq and Libya. If the western countries would have not helped, it would have been better. Here there is someone playing a game to force the West to intervene. May be a distraction to strike in another part of the world.
2 people like this

@LadyDuck (502189)
• Italy
14 Apr 18
@JamesHxstatic All the African continent is a mess. The refugees that come to Europe are mainly from Ethiopia, Somalia, Kenya and Nigeria. Egypt has always been a "hot" country, also dangerous for tourists.

@Deepizzaguy (122070)
• Lake Charles, Louisiana
10 Apr 18
Many political pundits are saying that the Civil War in Syria does not need the assistance of the West because if the Syrian leader gets removed from power, his successor will be worse than the current leader.
1 person likes this


@crossbones27 (52905)
• Mojave, California
10 Apr 18
Hey you leave our real president alone. We elected him on accident, but still our real president. I make bad jokes.
Putin is getting scarier by the day. I bet you are right nothing will get done about this. Sad always to late before people start to care
Putin is getting scarier by the day. I bet you are right nothing will get done about this. Sad always to late before people start to care@thedevilinme (5216)
• Northampton, England
10 Apr 18
If we dont act now chemical weapons will become legit in warfare
1 person likes this
@Courage7 (19626)
• United States
10 Apr 18
@thedevilinme You are true enough Cricketsoon. I think the US will stick their big boots in maybe, but then what you see..
@thedevilinme (5216)
• Northampton, England
10 Apr 18
@Courage7 They phone ahead where the missiles will land. Strange he doesn't ridicule Assad like he does Rocketman
1 person likes this






