The shadows argument

Tweet

Hello friends. Today I would like to present to you a refutation to one of the arguments that hoax believers propagate about the moon landings. Not that it has not been already debunked countless times but I wanted to also step in and share my opinion on it showing you a photo that I took today while getting back from work. The argument that I want to talk about and that conspiracy theorists propose is that not parallel shadows in Apollo photos is proof that the entire Apollo program was fake because in their opinion non-parallel shadows is proof of multiple light sources which feeds the idea that they filmed the moon landing videos here on Earth in some places illuminated by more than one light source. Their opinion is that it is impossible for just one source of light (the sun for example) to be casting shadows in different directions but as you can see in my photo here the sun is casting two non-parallel shadows which seem to converge towards the car. One of the shadows comes from the tree you see in the image and the other comes from a simple small pole. Can any of you here tell me why is it that their shadows are not parallel even if there is just one light source for both of them? If you don't understand why they are not parallel I will let you know in the comments. Bottom line is that their argument is obviously flawed considering that we can find example of non parallel shadows pretty easy.