Current Jobless Numbers Should Not Be A Gauge

@porwest (78761)
United States
March 26, 2020 12:44pm CST
While the US jobless numbers ARE indeed staggering at roughly 3 million newly unemployed, we should NOT use these numbers as an initial gauge of the current state of the economy, NOR should we use it as a current gauge of future impact on jobs. It is a preliminary number that is largely based on recent claims due to the decision to shutter certain businesses in the short term as we deal with the Coronavirus spread. Depending on how long this goes on, some of these jobs may well be permanently lost. However, many of these people will actually return to work eventually. So the numbers may be less, and quite a lot less once shelter in place orders are lifted and certain businesses can resume business as usual. By their nature the numbers may be higher today. But in the future I think they will be much, much lower. But like anything with this, it is a matter of wait and see. I think we just need to be careful about how we process all of this information. Including jobs numbers, bearing in mind that these workers may not be unemployed permanently. Instead, they are simply temporarily on hiatus without a paycheck. Joblessness normally has to do with economic conditions being unfavorable to a large workforce. These numbers were due to forced shut down of certain businesses.
7 people like this
5 responses
@hillhjill (23664)
• United States
26 Mar 20
I never go by the numbers they feed to us and try my best to break it down myself. I know I keep hearing that it's because of the CV but unemployment was up before this became a thing.
1 person likes this
@porwest (78761)
• United States
26 Mar 20
Not really actually. We were at historic lows just before the CV broke out. We had the lowest unemployment numbers from about 50 years ago.
1 person likes this
@hillhjill (23664)
• United States
26 Mar 20
@porwest well then something needs to change.
1 person likes this
@porwest (78761)
• United States
27 Mar 20
@hillhjill We did that four years ago when we elected Trump and finally turned the country around from a horrible recession. We could not have predicted Covid-19. But it is clear that BEFORE Covid-19 Trump's policies were working, and working extremely well. I think the fact that the economy WAS so strong before this whole thing got it's legs will be part of the reason we will have a faster and stronger recovery from it.
1 person likes this
@rappeter13 (8608)
• Romania
26 Mar 20
The longer the corona virus madness, the bigger the economical problems. But I am sure that things will get back on track, hopefully soon.
1 person likes this
• Romania
29 Mar 20
@porwest And the governments can take care of the economical actors. Some small companies will go bankrupt, I guess.
1 person likes this
@porwest (78761)
• United States
30 Mar 20
@rappeter13 Unfortunately I think a few of them might. The sad part about it is that small business, at least here in the US, provide for more than 70% of all jobs in this country. We NEED those small businesses to remain afloat.
1 person likes this
@porwest (78761)
• United States
29 Mar 20
We can only hope. It's a bit of a wait and see game. How the economy is impacted I think depends on how much activity returns to normal once we are over this.
1 person likes this
@Courtlynn (66921)
• United States
26 Mar 20
I agree!
1 person likes this
@Courtlynn (66921)
• United States
27 Mar 20
@porwest yup my moms ome who had hours go down due to the virus so had to sign up for unemployment
1 person likes this
@porwest (78761)
• United States
27 Mar 20
Thank you ma'am. We just have to make sure we can put the why to the numbers so that we can make more sense of them overall. It is very important to distinguish between 3 million workers out of work because the government has shut down businesses temporarily, and 3 million workers out of work because the business CLIMATE has changed and companies have let them go permanently.
1 person likes this
@porwest (78761)
• United States
29 Mar 20
@Courtlynn Sorry to hear that. But things will come back. Just a matter of time. I hope she does not lose work completely.
1 person likes this
@JohnRoberts (109857)
• Los Angeles, California
26 Mar 20
This is not quite like the great depression when there were just no jobs period. While this lockdown will finish off some retail businesses who were already in trouble, the jobs are there waiting for things to come alive again. Millions who file unemployment today could be right back to work in a month.
1 person likes this
@porwest (78761)
• United States
27 Mar 20
Yep. Right there with you. Even if we experience a bit of a recession from this I don't think it will be steep nor do I think will be a long one. The impact will be short term. The fact that we went into this with such a historically strong economy leads me to believe we will have a swift recovery.
1 person likes this
@LindaOHio (156157)
• United States
26 Mar 20
For the sake of the people affected, I hope their jobs are waiting for them at the end of this lockdown.
1 person likes this
@porwest (78761)
• United States
27 Mar 20
Some of these workers will unfortunately be out of work permanently. But it will be a far smaller number than the current number. Unfortunately some of these businesses just won't be able to come out on the other end of this still in business.
1 person likes this