In Mint Condition of Historical Structures
By Shavkat
@Shavkat (141906)
Philippines
March 4, 2021 9:35pm CST
I am reading an article that some urban developers want to relocate historical structures to other places. According to them, it is the best way to preserve them from being damaged with the continued building of skyscrapers. I cannot get it. If we are going to move them, they will lose the cultural history.
Is it the best way to preserve historical structures by relocating?
Do you know any historical structures being relocated?
Image Credit: industrytap.com
8 people like this
8 responses
@rsa101 (40952)
• Philippines
5 Mar 21
Well if the structure is already being overshadowed by larger structures then I guess it is time for them to be placed where they can be reconstructed to their original state before those modern structures would swallow them up. I think there is a place here somewhere in Bataan where the old houses were brought there and placed there like they were in the olden days. It is now a tourist destination it is like a museum of old houses in the Philippines. I know they were the original houses that were brought there to be preserved in that condition.
1 person likes this



@DaddyEvil (174208)
• United States
5 Mar 21
I don't understand. What does it matter where the building is located? It will still be the historical building, no matter where it stands.
1 person likes this
@Laurakemunto (13787)
• Kenya
5 Mar 21
It's not a good idea. I it will also lose the meaning why move it?
1 person likes this












