I is for Institutional racism ?

Tweet

So the big interview aired and Meghan got the headlines she wanted. HER. The woman who went to Canada to escape the tabloids and media crush to live a life of solitude didn't keep that Utopian dream alive long and soon back where she is most comfortable - the center of attention and celebrity. She claimed there was no help in 'The Firm' for her mental health yet she and Harry spent a year talking about it and Harry admitting he had loads of therapy, therapy that Megs mysteriously didn't have access to. On the racism claim I can quite well believe it in the royal family, Lets not forget Prince Harry made the headlines with this. Oprah didn't seem to bring this up. Oprah didn't seem to bring a lot of stuff up. I can quite well believe the brown skin comment to, after all most people were thinking exactly that at the time and would the Royal Family be able to deal with it? Why was Megs hiding Archie from the worlds press? Did she fear he would be dark and have 'freaky' hair, as they say? She clearly doesn't want to embrace her black side and very western looking, no doubt using mild skin bleaching at some point in her life. She is just not ever going to get anywhere near the racism levels, say, Oprah Winfrey would have experienced at Megs age. Megs is a simply a beautiful woman that has lived off exactly that vanity and underestimated the archaic Royal Family rules and has been rejected by the British establishment. Inferring Archie was denied prince status and security because he is brown is absurd, royal protocol he is not a prince until Granddad is king. Meghan seemed upset that she wasn't locked into the family with a royal baby prince. Now she has no prince's at all!Meghan had one, yes one relative at her wedding, preferring to have A List celebrities she hardly knew there than people she grew up with. The Palace will begin to hit back. Remember, they had no right to reply or pre- look at the interview. Its going to get ugly folks! Her and Harry's foundation is already being looked at under charity fraud rules here.