Just somebody's relict

@JudyEv (381837)
Rockingham, Australia
January 18, 2023 12:43am CST
We’ve just returned from a road trip to feed the canaries and cats that belong to a friend. On the way, we passed through West Dale, a locality that has a lovely old church and community hall and a big farming community. I’ll have photos of the buildings later but what I found really interesting were the gravestones in the churchyard, in particular one, part of which said ‘Richard Potts, relict of the late Alicia Potts, died 1916, aged 82 years.’ I can’t decipher the rest. The use of the word ‘relict’ intrigued me so off I went to Mr Google and found that, as a legal term, it means ‘widow’ or ‘widower. Other meanings (taken from the web) are: "A species that inhabits a much smaller geographic area than it did in the past, often because of environmental change" or "something that has survived; a remnant". I’m glad ‘relict’ is a real word but to me, it makes the person sound like a leftover.
16 people like this
15 responses
@rsa101 (40952)
• Philippines
18 Jan 23
It didn't seem good to hear that one is a leftover, even if technically speaking they are leftover because their mate passed away. I think it's rarely used these days, and the term "relict" is more often applied to other things as an old object than to people.
3 people like this
@rsa101 (40952)
• Philippines
19 Jan 23
@JudyEv Oh yeah I didn't realize the spelling is different "relics" vs "relict". I found this link that explains the difference between the two words.... interesting.
https://kddidit.com/2020/05/12/word-confusion-relic-versus-relict/
1 person likes this
@JudyEv (381837)
• Rockingham, Australia
19 Jan 23
@rsa101 Thanks for the link. It says 'relict' is a widow, not a widower so, if that is so, the gravestone has it wrong.
1 person likes this
@JudyEv (381837)
• Rockingham, Australia
18 Jan 23
I agree. I'm aware of 'relics' but haven't seen it applied to people.
2 people like this
@allknowing (153544)
• India
19 Jan 23
I have come across relict being used on people and as @rsa101 has explained it a widow or a widower is sure a left over.
2 people like this
@allknowing (153544)
• India
19 Jan 23
@JudyEv I thought he said partner
1 person likes this
@JudyEv (381837)
• Rockingham, Australia
19 Jan 23
The link from @rsa101 says it is a widow but not a widower so that's another thing I've learnt.
1 person likes this
@JudyEv (381837)
• Rockingham, Australia
19 Jan 23
@allknowing When I went to the link, it said 'widow'.
• China
18 Jan 23
I didn't know relict had the meaning of widow’ or widower .However we have to say Richard Potts lived to a great age then.
2 people like this
@Shavkat (141906)
• Philippines
18 Jan 23
I guess I learned a word that is something new to ponder today.
2 people like this
@JudyEv (381837)
• Rockingham, Australia
18 Jan 23
I don't really think it is a word worth remembering! lol
@LadyDuck (502204)
• Italy
18 Jan 23
I knew the meaning of relict, it derives from the Latin reliquiae, meaning "remains". We have so many "relict of Saints" in the Churches in Italy, it's not a word that I can miss.
2 people like this
@LadyDuck (502204)
• Italy
18 Jan 23
@JudyEv I have seen "relict" and it has never been something I found "pleasant" to see.
2 people like this
@JudyEv (381837)
• Rockingham, Australia
18 Jan 23
I've heard of 'relics' as regards the saints but I've never seen 'relict' and haven't seen either on a tombstone.
2 people like this
@DaddyEvil (174281)
• United States
18 Jan 23
It looks like they didn't bury husband and wife side by side there? Unless that's a double gravestone? I find that odd... And to call someone a relict of someone else... You're right. A forgotten part of them. Weird.
2 people like this
@JudyEv (381837)
• Rockingham, Australia
18 Jan 23
Many couples are buried side by side but not all. I don't know why some are and some aren't.
2 people like this
@DaddyEvil (174281)
• United States
18 Jan 23
@JudyEv I've never understood that, either. After dad passed away, mom got married again but when she passed away, she was buried next to dad.
2 people like this
@snowy22315 (208768)
• United States
18 Jan 23
I certainly never heard that term. I don't think it caught on..
1 person likes this
@JudyEv (381837)
• Rockingham, Australia
19 Jan 23
I've never seen it before. Maybe they thought it sounded 'fancy'.
@rebelann (117204)
• El Paso, Texas
18 Jan 23
Thats a new word to me. I suppose a widow or widower could be considered a left over of a marriage. Interesting gravestone though.
1 person likes this
@rebelann (117204)
• El Paso, Texas
19 Jan 23
Oh, ok, a widow could be considered a left over but a widower could not, interesting isn't it.
1 person likes this
@JudyEv (381837)
• Rockingham, Australia
19 Jan 23
Apparently it only means a widow but not a widower so the gravestone has got it wrong.
1 person likes this
@wolfgirl569 (135601)
• Marion, Ohio
18 Jan 23
I had no idea it was a word
1 person likes this
@JudyEv (381837)
• Rockingham, Australia
19 Jan 23
Me either. I'm familiar with relics but not relict.
1 person likes this
@Fleura (34935)
• United Kingdom
18 Jan 23
I take it that Richard was the name at the top? Or was the unreadable part 'the late Alicia'?
1 person likes this
@JudyEv (381837)
• Rockingham, Australia
18 Jan 23
I've written it as it appeared. At the very top might have been 'In sacred memory' or something like that but I didn't really want to guess at it. 'Potts' is mentioned again on the last line but I couldn't read the rest.
1 person likes this
@RubyHawk (99367)
• Atlanta, Georgia
19 Jan 23
I don’t like the sound of it either , seems it should have said widower.
1 person likes this
@JudyEv (381837)
• Rockingham, Australia
19 Jan 23
I think that would have been a much better choice.
1 person likes this
@JudyEv (381837)
• Rockingham, Australia
19 Jan 23
@RubyHawk It was probably okay in its day but it sounds archaic now.
1 person likes this
@RubyHawk (99367)
• Atlanta, Georgia
19 Jan 23
@JudyEv It would sound much more respectful.
1 person likes this
@LindaOHio (222285)
• United States
18 Jan 23
How interesting. I love going to old cemeteries.
1 person likes this
@JudyEv (381837)
• Rockingham, Australia
18 Jan 23
There is always something interesting at such places.
1 person likes this
@CarolDM (203396)
• Nashville, Tennessee
18 Jan 23
That does sound like perhaps a poor choice of a word to use.
1 person likes this
@JudyEv (381837)
• Rockingham, Australia
19 Jan 23
I think so too but then it is a very old headstone. Fashions come and go I guess even in headstones.
1 person likes this
@CarolDM (203396)
• Nashville, Tennessee
21 Jan 23
@JudyEv I think you are right.
1 person likes this
@Beestring (15373)
• Hong Kong
18 Jan 23
This word is new to me. Given the meaning explained in this post, it sounds odd to call someone a relict of someone else.
2 people like this
@JudyEv (381837)
• Rockingham, Australia
18 Jan 23
That's what I thought but the gravestone was erected a very long time ago. I can't imagine the word being used now.
1 person likes this
@Fleura (34935)
• United Kingdom
18 Jan 23
Yes, a leftover is exactly what comes to my mind as well. I don't think I have ever seen that term used on a gravestone, only in legal documents and that sort of thing.
1 person likes this
@JudyEv (381837)
• Rockingham, Australia
18 Jan 23
It was a new one to me for sure.
1 person likes this