Do not directly or indirectly suggest people should read more of what you post.

Well said, some indirectly suggest their post... I am going to suggest this one.

Wow, you're being awfully nice about it considering most members would already know better. I promise I won't try to promote my own discussions ......... but you're more than welcome to read em

Okie doke. Don’t think I’ve done this ever hopefully. I’ll suggest this to everyone on my list :)

I only add the link to another one of my posts when someone asks me something that I have just written. I don´t think you are mean

With sugar and spice and everything nice, that's what following the rules are made of .

I stopped! We know you're not being mean. I was not trying to be sneaky though. I thought it was OK.

I haven't actually seen that, but may I suggest... Never mind...

Sugar? I need antacid. LOL Kidding. I didn't notice such posts, but I am not here as often. My friends don't resort to such things. I used to do something like that...kinda, the post was sorta continuation of the previous one...2nd point, 3rd point...and so on. I wondered whether that was allowed.

We need a myLot David Banner. They wouldn’t like him mad. Thanks for the explanation of the rules.

Well........since you asked so sweetly, even sprinkled with sugar, I am happy to abide. But I always try to abide and I thank you for bringing this up, nobody wants to see you aggrevated.

You are nice. I never do unless someone asks or is lost about something I am talking about. Please let us know if that is okay as I see a couple of others have mentioned doing that

Thank you for the clarification. And thanks to @LadyDuck for the suggestion. But can I just ask - you mean we should never ever refer a reader to any other of our own posts? I know I have sometimes done this because I write something that is related to a previous post. For example earlier this year I wrote quite a long post about how annoyed I was at losing my favourite ever story CD. And then a couple of days later I wrote another long post all about the lengths I had gone to to replace it, and I mentioned that this followed on from my earlier post and included a link. Was this wrong? Should I not have provided the link? Should I not have mentioned that I had written about the lost CD before? Should I have repeated the whole story again at the start? Or added it at the end as an addendum for those who were interested? And if I did that would I fall foul of the rules against copying, because half the text would be the same as the previous discussion? Or should I not have written discussions that were on related subjects at all? Sorry, I don't do this to try to tempt readers to more of my discussions, but just to save repeating myself and provide the necessary background to whatever I'm talking about, so I'm just a bit confused.

No worries.

Clear.... Thanks for suggestion

Fine with this ! Does this also means that one cannot share one's own Mylot post link in another post? What if one has a Series of connected posts? E.g - "Trip to Xyz part 1..", "... Part 2..." and so on.

I agree with that. Some do it to get you to like and respond to more of their discussions.

Yes sir.

Good post. I have noticed a lot of this lately.

I think you are doing your job and not being mean. I sometimes use the link of my posts written earlier if I have some references to me made in my current post. Sometimes even send link of others post. Is that not allowed? If so, I will not do it. Thank you@LadyDuck for suggesting this.

Well, never done this myself but seen some people do it. Thought it to be allowed. Anyways, thnx for the heads up.