Not really a political discussion

Tweet

I'm not going to discuss any President after 2000. I want to make that abundantly clear here at the beginning. And if you want to, I will not respond to it. I will, probably toward the end, tell a funny story, but not to say how good or bad anyone is. Now, I was reading an article about Watergate, yes, that Watergate. It got me thinking about Richard Nixon and that got me thinking about Presidents in general. There have been some Presidents who were good with foreign affairs. There have been some good a domestic affairs. There have been some who were good at both and, needless to say, some who were awful with both. And some who became President for other reasons. Richard Nixon was pretty darn good at foreign affairs, he was awful at domestic ones. Jimmy Carter was good with domestic affairs but seen as weak with foreign ones by nations outside of the U.S. LBJ - he was not a very nice man, he was rude, sexist and, shall we say, 'earthy?' He was also pretty good with domestic affairs. It is hard to say exactly how bad he was with foreign affairs because he had been trying to follow what he thought JFK would want, at least until he was elected on his own. Speaking of JFK, well... it is hard to say how good, or bad, he was. He was beloved by many. Even more after he was shot. It is like you can't judge him because of it. He certainly wasn't as bad as many in either foreign or domestic affairs, but I doubt you could say he was great at either. Eisenhower, what can you say? He played a mean game of golf? He was a good general, better than some who also became Presidents (can you say Grant? I knew you could.) I don't really remember much about him being President, but I do appreciate the interstate highways he pushed for. Eisenhower was the last President that had a view of a balanced government, not having any one of the three branches having more power. Now, I'm pretty sure all of those of us who can remember Eisenhower, are probably about the oldest President we can remember, so I'm going to stop here. Ronald Reagan's Presidency is pretty divisive and he wasn't the best the U.S. ever had but he wasn't the worst. He had a very charismatic personality. Personally I wish the gun rules he signed into law known as "the Brady Bill" were still in effect. This law was named after his press secretary, James Brady, who was seriously injured during the assassination attempt on the President. George H.W. Bush, well, he won because of Reagan. He wasn't awful, but he did break his promise to the Republicans about "no new taxes." So, I think his handle on domestic affairs wasn't good. He was doing okay in the foreign section until he threw up on the Japanese Prime Minister. I don't think he would've lost in '92 if he hadn't had a rich enemy, H.Ross Perot. Now... I don't know if Perot ran against him because of the taxes thing, but I suspect the two, both kind of Texans, had a history before the taxes. I know H.W. really was a Yankee, more of a D*mned Yankee, but so am I, so... I know Perot was born in Texas, but really Texarkana is half in and half out of state so... Then we get to the Clintons. I'm not sure I can say much about them. I don't think Clinton was particularly good with either affairs, he was more into the carnal type of affairs. I kind of wonder if Perot decided to support Bill Clinton by running against Bush in 1992, after all, the other side of Texarkana is Arkansas. Not that he would every directly support a Democrat, but the campaign he ran in 1992 was mostly attacking Bush. I won't say I loved any of these guys, but I will say that all of them were better than Perot - except he tried really hard to save Treaty Oak so that's a good thing. No, I'm not forgetting Gerald Ford. I did like him. I'm so glad that he was selected after Agnew resigned. I suspect there might've been a push to keep Nixon until a good replacement for Agnew was chosen. Because, OMG! things would've been really bad if he had become President. I know you always hear about all politicians are crooked. But Agnew was an absolute pretzel of a politician! Now for my funny story, it took place in the 1990s. Connie, sometimes known here as Maggiepie, was watching the FOX news. On it she heard that George Bush was going to run for Governor. She said to me: "That must a come down from President to run for Governor." I said - and I know he's not, but - "He's junior." "What?" she asked. "That is his son." This is the joy of generational politics isn't it? Happened with the Adams' too. The two Roosevelts were related. Only Andrew Johnson and Lyndon Johnson were not related. So, what do you think? Do you agree? Again, I will NOT respond to modern politics.