mental illnesses: real versus reel

@sootix (92)
India
December 16, 2006 7:20am CST
The other day I was watching fight club yet again, and the way it portrays schizophrenia had me thinking about how movies show mental illnesses in general and how different they are in real life.. leaving this movie aside (considering it captures a multiple personality disorder very well), and some other very well made movies like primal fear, i've noticed quite a few movies go to the extent of ridiculing or making fun of a patient or his/her plight (more so in case of bollywood movies, the most recent goes to the extent of showing a mental patient being physically tortured)... where should one draw the line? should it be drawn at all? how much of a leeway should creative license get these film-makers? what role do you think research plays in such movies? what's your take on the whole scene?
1 person likes this
1 response
@Tanya8 (1733)
• Canada
20 Dec 06
That's interesting; I've watched Fight Club several times, and it never occured to me that the character had schizophrenia. (I've worked with people who have it, and one of my close friends has it, so I'm somewhat familiar with it). I just took it to be a "movie illness" - not really meant to closely represent a genuine illness in the real world. I assumed the writer had intended us to think that the character's condition had been brought on by the society he lived in, and that the same could happen to any young, male consumer. I do agree with you though that mental illness is often misrepresented in the movies or even played for laughs. I don't think films should be censored, but when films that unfairly portray people suffering from a given condition come out, that it's worthwhile for these people (or agencies who work with them) to speak up.
1 person likes this
@sootix (92)
• India
20 Dec 06
yes.. the agencies and people should ideally speak up, though they seldom do.. thanks for your response :-)