'It is better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all'?

@loralee (542)
United States
April 18, 2007 10:44pm CST
Just what the title says. I can't write it any better.
3 people like this
3 responses
@AD11RGUY (1265)
• United States
9 Nov 07
That's a tough one. If one never experiences love and all of its downfalls, have they really lost? On the other hand, if one has experienced love and lost, seeing that love is forever, have they lost? My guess is that it varies for everyone. Those who have successfully held on to "love" have won as far as they are concerned. But others may say they have lost because if that "love" ever leaves them, they will be miserable from that moment forward. And of course the ones that consider themselves loved will think those who have not experienced love have lost, for they don't know the joy of love. Yet the losers will say they have won for they know not the pain of love. Seems like I'm going in circles here. But then again, that's how I see the answer to the question being answered - if that makes any sense.
2 people like this
@hmike_d (1529)
• Philippines
19 Apr 07
That's right! It is always better to have loved than never at all. So simple, how did you find true happiness outside love...., or else you may have live your life logically...
@lornalhai (148)
• China
19 Apr 07
Of course, you are happy to own the love, but if you have to lose it because of some reasons, you are also lucky beacuse you have a fine love recall at least.
1 person likes this