Is DREAMWEAVER esier for design than HTML code?

@nill_07 (1104)
Bangladesh
April 27, 2007 3:21am CST
Dreamweaver provide many design tools that is easy to drag for design.For the same case html need to write a number of line code. What do you think about that?
3 people like this
13 responses
@jalbeos (1175)
• Philippines
30 Apr 07
I heard about Dreamweaver but right now I am using Trellian Webpage for my websites... I haven't tried Dreamweaver yet.
@nill_07 (1104)
• Bangladesh
2 May 07
I totally vise versa fo you.
@jalbeos (1175)
• Philippines
2 May 07
Maybe DW is easier than Trellian but I am comfortable with Trellian right. I want to learn DW too, sometime.
1 person likes this
@boboman (18)
• Greece
30 Apr 07
yes it is easy,but i think FrontPage is easier....Also because it's in your language(most)..
• Australia
2 May 07
Yes it is true that FrontPage is easier. It was designed for beginners. The purists did call it a program for children. At the time I was using FrontPage 98... you could almost build a webpage twice as fast with Frontpage than you could with Dreamweaver. But FrontPage has its limitations... while Dreamweaver does not. Certain codes did not work with Frontpage.
1 person likes this
@nill_07 (1104)
• Bangladesh
30 Apr 07
I am not familiar with FrontPage. So it is hard to realize me FrontPage is easier than DW. Thanks for your openion.
@shyam221 (519)
• India
6 May 07
dreamveaver is good tool for web developing web pages you get lots of automatically generated code on the page behind . you can create very fast html page than any other in any editor. it gives lots code for developers too.
1 person likes this
@nill_07 (1104)
• Bangladesh
7 May 07
You are are right it is so easier as a html editor tool..
• India
7 May 07
I like to write my own code in HTML for many pages. But it is little easier in Dreamweaver. I also like Coffee cup HTML editor. These are good products but i never find much flexibility in their code. If i wanted a simple page it takes nearly 20 KB in these softwares but when i write my own code it just takes some amount of bytes. Size does matters.
1 person likes this
@nill_07 (1104)
• Bangladesh
7 May 07
Dreamweaver is easier but nodoubt it is also better to write code in hand for him who can manage it. Really, size does not matter when quality quality is a matter of factor.
• India
7 May 07
Yes, Dreamweaver is very easy and effective web designing software. It has so many advance features on which you can work very easily. These feature are very easy to understand. In dreamweaver you have almost all web designing feature and options. Through Dreamweaver you can upload the files to remote server by using FTP options. Using Dreamweaver you can also make database driven websites. You can make dynamic pages in asp. There are lots of features. You can implement CSS Stylesheet very easily. You can do DHTML in your website very easily. You can javascript very easily. So Dreamweaver is the best software to design a dynamic website.
1 person likes this
@nill_07 (1104)
• Bangladesh
7 May 07
Now a days I am trying to design a website using Dreamweaver. Of course it will be better if I can design a database driven website using Dreamweaver. ASP is really great for designing dynamic pages & CSS (Cascade Style Sheet) is also a good design tool here...
@Goldmoney (313)
• Slovenia
11 May 07
If you want to learn Html, then the best product is notepad, because you will have to remember all tags for your self. If you use Dreamweaver at start you easy get lost in the code provided by him. And there is also a problem if you use some of the beforehand code, because Dreamweaver put a lot uselessness in the code. I am not saying that Dreamweaver is bad, because I use it myself to. But if you are a new to Html I recommend using of notepad.
@nill_07 (1104)
• Bangladesh
18 May 07
I have basic knowledge about html. DREAMWEAVER do work faster for that I need it.
@Aussies2007 (5336)
• Australia
30 Apr 07
Programs are made to save time and to give you the opportunity to create a website without having to learn html. Programming in html these days is simply old fashion. The only valid reason for doing it... would be that you cannot afford to buy a program. For the purists... if you don't like the codes of Dreamweaver... there is nothing stopping you from editing them to your liking. I have built websites for 10 years without learning html. Even so... today I can read any html code and understand what it does. Because of that... I also know how to edit them. But I have not learned those codes by heart and I would not know how to write my own from memory. The first 3 years I was using Frontpage 98... and for the last 7 years... I am using Dreamweaver. I currently use the version MX 2004. I don't think it is an easy program to use or learn. Like every program... you need to put the hard work in it to learn how to use it. You probably could learn html as fast as learning on how to use Dreamweaver. But the great thing is that you can design a simple webpage without knowing anything. You just learn on the run as you add new things to your webpage. For the last two years... I have started to use CSS instead of html to make the pages load faster... even so... it hardly matter these days as everyone is on broadband.
1 person likes this
@nill_07 (1104)
• Bangladesh
2 May 07
DW is really great. Thanks for sharing your memories with me.
• Philippines
28 Apr 07
Honestly I don't like to use dreamweaver and I tried using it before but it didn't satisfy me at all. I prefer to code my website than to use dreamweaver because I can able to do whatever I want. Yes I know dreamweaver really makes it easy but sometimes there are things you can't do in dreamweaver. This is my website. http://www.ez-dollar-income.ws
@nill_07 (1104)
• Bangladesh
28 Apr 07
Thank u 4 ur honest information. Actually html is best for design & DW is better.
@juicebox (106)
• United States
29 Apr 07
similar to microsoft frontpage, dreamweaver is a website builder that doesn't require html knowledge. the only problem is that such programs are never flawless. they contain small glitches where the codes could go wrong. if you code the website yourself, you know just what you're putting in and you avoid the problem of bad codes.
1 person likes this
@nill_07 (1104)
• Bangladesh
29 Apr 07
Since DW code yourself so it really hard to resolve error. On the otherhand html code is flexible for changing the website according to the builder.
@goje87 (23)
• India
27 Apr 07
Dreamweaver is a HTML editor... its WYSWYG.. meaning What You See is What You Get.... you just design something and DW writes the code for you... well DW is not the only HTML editor....there are many other HTML editors like Microsoft FrontPage...and Coffee Cup HTML editor...and many other.... i have worked with the HTML editors that i have just mentioned...but found DW the easier one to work with...
@nill_07 (1104)
• Bangladesh
28 Apr 07
Ms Frontpage, Coffe Cup HTML editor are some tools like dreamweaver but I am not familiar about that. Really DW is easier html editor tool.
@shak143 (1280)
• India
27 Apr 07
Ofcourse dreamweaver is best but using html is better for designing staic pages.
1 person likes this
@nill_07 (1104)
• Bangladesh
28 Apr 07
Actually DW is useful for quick designing & html is useful for learning coding language.
• Finland
27 Apr 07
i refer html coding with notepad, my opinion is that when you make your website with dreamweaver your site looks different every browser. So I refer Hand coding, maybe you have to learn html-language more, but site works better and seems just like you want. So don't use dreamweaver, use notepad make your code your own hand. I use dreamweaver only for text adding, but if i do structural changes my site or add something element my site i do it my own hand without wysiwyg automatic. This is my last site its fully hand coding, and w3c valid too: http://agloco-finland.awardspace.us/
@nill_07 (1104)
• Bangladesh
28 Apr 07
DW may cause different looking as per the browser it is new information to me.Thank you for ur reference.
@mik0930 (371)
• Philippines
1 May 07
Dreamweaver still uses HTML Code. Dreamweaver, for me, is not a good drag and drop design tool for HTML. Compared to other similar WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) editors, Dreamweaver is harder to use. Why, you don't really have the freedom to drag and drop. I'd rather recommend these software for full drag-and-drop HTML: 1.) Microsoft Frontpage 2.) Microsoft Publisher (the one's used in making brochures, can make HTML too). Dreamweaver is for quite experienced web designers. I use it to sort of preview the code i've hardcoded instantly. It is also good for text formatting and CSS but not for drag and dropping elements. Hope this helps.
1 person likes this
@nill_07 (1104)
• Bangladesh
2 May 07
Ms Frontpage & Ms Publisher are more easier html editor according ur recommandetion. Thanks 4 ur suggestion.