Fred Thompson for President of the USA?
@redyellowblackdog (10629)
United States
May 3, 2007 7:53pm CST
Senator Fred Thompson (also actor) has recently been getting some "buzz" as a potential presidential candidate. Here's some links:
http://www.nashvillepost.com/news/2007/3/12/analysis_fred_thompsonpresident
http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/01/25/the-next-reagan/
http://www.grassrootsvoter.com/?gclid=CPvK0duW84sCFSA4UAod-yCrYQ
http://draftthompson08.blogspot.com/
What do you think? Would Fred Thompson make a good GOP candidate. Would he make a good President? Could he defeat Hillary Clinton?
What do you say?
3 people like this
5 responses
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
4 May 07
I am hoping Sen. Fred Thompson does run for president. So far, all the Republican candidates have been telling us that they are the "most conservative". Fred Thompson wouldn't have to qualify his conservatism, he IS a conservative. He wouldn't have to try to tell us how conservative he is, his bio tells the tale for us.
Most candidates try to become what they think the voters want them to be. All Fred Thompson has to do is say his name and we know.
That will cost him votes, and gain him votes, but it is also how all candidates should be.
3 people like this
@redyellowblackdog (10629)
• United States
4 May 07
Yes, today's candidates are excellent at using the language in ambiguous and deceitful ways.
I agree all candidates should be more like their "true" selves and let the votes fall where they may but it is never going to happen as long as people vote the way that they do.
Too many people are emotionally passive aggressive and will strike out negatively at anyone presenting an unpleasent truthful idea. Just check my star rating.
While I can be proud of my posts and the response they elicit from overly emotional people afraid to challenge my ideas directly in writing, imagine how few votes a politician presenting unpleasent truth would get.
So, long story short, I too hope Fred Thompson runs for President and wins while continueing to present his ideas in a truthful manner. It would be a sign of hope for the future.
2 people like this
@surveyclub (128)
• United States
4 May 07
Mr. Thompson, who was in Congress left because he stated that he was sick and tired of politics. I think that if he was a serious politician he should have stated and continued to fight to change the craziness that is going on in Washington.
Capital Hill is in much worse shape than it was before he left, will he become frustrated again and want to leave and only stay because of forced commentment, if he is elected?
2 people like this
@redyellowblackdog (10629)
• United States
4 May 07
Truely, a great question. Thank-you for asking it. If Capital Hill is in worse shape since Mr. Thompson left, by all means let's send him back with the knowledge that the American public supports him and his views so he has less need to become frustrated.
2 people like this
@irisheyes (4370)
• United States
11 May 07
Isn't he the actor on Law & Order? Well, no matter, his conservative credentials seem to be impeccable and I hope he does run. I'm a HUGE Hilary Clinton supporter and i don't think he can defeat her. On the other hand, I think John McCain might. Also, I like McCain and I don't want to vote for someone else against him.
1 person likes this
@redyellowblackdog (10629)
• United States
12 May 07
Yes, he is the actor on Law & Order. Yes, Hillary Clinton is the candidate most likely to win in 2008.
I can't say I like Hillary Clinton or John McCain, but facts are facts. Both are better known and have better chances at the moment than Fred Thompson.
Politics are fun! :-)
1 person likes this
@Destiny007 (5805)
• United States
4 May 07
Thompson seems like he would be a good president.
As always, the truth of the matter will come out after the election no matter who gets into office.
All to often what a candidate says, and what they do are two entirely different things.
Sorry about your star rating.
Mine went down a notch overnight. That is common when a person holds views that are politically incorrect.
2 people like this
@soccermom (3198)
• United States
4 May 07
I was not surprised to see that on one of your links they were comparing Sen. Thompson to Ronald Reagan. I saw something on CNN awhile back that also likened his career to Reagan. I don't know too much about him but from what I've heard he sounds like he is pretty conservative. I've included a link that I found to check him out. I can't say alot of the things I saw pleased me and I'd like to know more on his reasons for some of these votes. And I know it's petty, but everytime I see him all I think is "there's the Law & Order guy."
http://www.ontheissues.org/senate/Fred_Thompson.htm
1 person likes this

@soccermom (3198)
• United States
4 May 07
I have to say that I am surprised you haven't gotten more responses to this. I myself lean towards the more liberal side, but I do respect conservative views. As far as Thompson running a good point was made, the guy really does stay true to himself and his beliefs, the only flipflop I see on his Senate voting record had to do with Kosovo, and if you ask half of the population they won't even know what happened there.
1 person likes this
@redyellowblackdog (10629)
• United States
4 May 07
Kosovo! You had to mention that? One of my bugaboos, for sure. Once upon a time I had to take a course in the Law of Land Warfare and the Geneva Convention. It was taught by the US Army. I'll sum up for you what I learned as to how it applies to Kosovo.
A legal UN recognized government was attacked by the US military forces with thousands of civilians killed. There was no declaration of war. These two facts taken together clearly make this war illegal. USA military officers in this matter and especially President Clinton are guilty of an enormous war crime.
Iraq? This was clearly a legal war as Saddam was in violation of the UN resolutions ending the first Gulf War. The USA had every legal right to enforce the UN resolutions and peace agreement.
2 people like this
@soccermom (3198)
• United States
4 May 07
I guess what I was trying to say is that when I saw this....Voted YES on allowing all necessary force in Kosovo. (May 1999)
Voted NO on authorizing air strikes in Kosovo. (Mar 1999)
I wonder what made him change his mind on allowing the air strikes. But I also noticed when I read his voting record that overall he seems to do a great job of making up his mind and sticking to it, compared to other politicians.
1 person likes this






