If this is the "21'st Century"...
By DuoMaxwell
@DuoMaxwell (953)
United States
May 14, 2007 9:24pm CST
This is something I wanted to clear up for a long time.
As I said, if this is the "21'st Century", then shouldn't this year, 2007, be actually this year "2107"? We're already in the future! I mean, there should be a "Century Zero" at the time Christ was born on 0000 BC/AD. Since this year is 2007, we should be in the 20th Century.
Take for example, this: The year America was founded in 1776, in the 18th Century. There are two ways this mistake could've been settled:
Since it was the 18th Century, America should've been founded on July 4, 1876, whereas it would've been founded in the 17th Century.
Another example is birthdays. IF there was a "Zero Century", then I would've been born on August 8, 2085, instead of 1985. If that was the case, I would've been born in the 19'th Century!
I know this is complicated, and yet, this is simple. How come they didn't do a "Zero Century" long long ago to prevent this mistake?
1 person likes this
2 responses
@coolseeds (3919)
• United States
15 May 07
What you are excluding is the 1st century. 000-099 is the 1st century. Therefore 100-199 is the 2nd.
Which makes 2000-2099 the 21st century if you count them out.
@coolseeds (3919)
• United States
15 May 07
You may understand it better this way.
This is the 21st century. Which is the 1st century of the 2000s.
@visitorinvasion (7709)
• United States
15 May 07
Ok, it's like this. 1-100 years is the first century.
101-200 years is the second century. Thus 2000-2100 would be the 21st century.
Does that make more sense now?



