Blake Should Have Won American Idol
By tep91005
@tep91005 (375)
United States
5 responses
@bunbunrocks (185)
• United States
4 Jun 07
I think it's good for all the non-winners who can sing not to win.. Their contract is shorter, and it allows them creative freedoms they wouldn't otherwise have.
1 person likes this
@emarie (5442)
• United States
4 Jun 07
thats right...i mean, i loved blake too, but he doesn't have to go under idol contract for long. and after that he'll deffinetly get another contrct to do an album...i mean...c'mon...do we all remember Clay Aiken?? hehe he'll make it no doubt, and even Melinda...she's got a real future ahead of her and i'm looking forward to that one as well.
1 person likes this
@geekcritic (63)
• Philippines
13 Jun 07
I agree with you there.
However, I think Jordin shouldn't have won either.
It should have been Chris Richardson.
@raychill (6525)
• United States
5 Jun 07
Blake was my pick from the very beginning but I did not want him to win. I wanted Jordin to win and Blake to be runner up. Blake didn't really seem like the "Idol" type and sometimes it seems that the runner up almost does better than the winner (sometimes) and I think Blake has the ability to be successful on his own terms more than on Idols. Plus, that final song was totally made for Jordin and not Blake.