"Freedom Fighters"??

@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
June 13, 2007 3:45pm CST
I keep hearing people on the left refer to the people fighting against the government of Iraq "Freedom Fighters". Please, if you consider them Freedom Fighters, explain to me what they have done towards establishing "Freedom" in Iraq? So far, the US led coalition and the Iraq government have built state of the art hospitals, clinics and schools; built bridges and highways; and established power and running water in areas that have never had it. So what do your "freedom fighters" have to show for their efforts? Other than a long line of dead bodies from the civilians they target?
3 people like this
4 responses
@urbangirl (1456)
• Australia
14 Jun 07
I wouldn't call them freedom fighters but rebel fighters. They probably see the US as an invading force and think they have a right to drive US forces from the country. My two cents worth is that stability should be a priority before a democratically elected government, but that would mean the US would have to "own" the problem of the instability there, which it doesn't want to do. I am glad that Iraq is being rebuilt though and definitely do not agree with the destruction these rebels are wreaking which are only hurting other Iraqis. History has shown that after an invasion and drawn out war, there is usually a civil war, so the US should have prepared for that possibility rather than the absurd propaganda being bandied about before the inavsion that all the Iraqi's would welcome US troops with flowers and that it would all be over in a couple of weeks.
2 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
14 Jun 07
I'll agree with you and disagree with you here. While there are some true insurgents in Iraq, most aren't from Iraq at all. Al Qaeda, The Taliban and other Islamists have moved into Iraq to fight. They aren't fighting for anyone's freedom, they are merely making Iraq the epicenter of their war against Western cutlure. Also, the war against the Hussein regime did end quickly. The war changed but most people didn't consider it a different war. Sadly, the change was acknowledged by Prs. Bush and the government of Iraq, but they didn't change how they fought the war. Now they have, let's hope it works!
2 people like this
@youdontsay (3497)
• United States
14 Jun 07
I don't believe the governments motives in Iraq had much to do with Iraqi freedom in the first place. And it has only gotten worse. Yes, Saddam was a cruel dictator. But he was not our responsibility. We weren't asked to "liberate Iraq" by anyone. I am sickened by this war, by our brave military personnel who sacrifice their lives for Bush, so that he can see himself as a War President who liberates people. What a situation.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
14 Jun 07
Fair enough, but while the US and other countries have done things that have made improvements for Iraqis, what have the "freedom fighters" done?
2 people like this
• United States
14 Jun 07
I don't even know who they are referring to. Our military? The insurgents? Since we are now occupying Iraq, those who fight against us could be considered freedom fighters!
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
14 Jun 07
No one "occupies Iraq" anymore. The occupation ended when the people of Iraq elected a government. While there are true insurgents in Iraq, you really can't say there are "freedom fighters" fighting against the government of Iraq since those doing the fighting have never done anything to show they care about freedom for Iraq. They haven't put out ONE dinar towards building anything... they only behead prisoners and target civilians.
1 person likes this
@Destiny007 (5805)
• United States
15 Jun 07
They aren't freedom fighters, they are fighting to prevent the citizens of Iraq from having the freedoms that the new government provides. These terrorists that the insipid left keep referring to as freedom fighters want to control the Iraq people in much the same way that Saddam did...this time it would be them in control. The insipid left should be taken out and shot for their stupidity, the only problem is that they aren't worth the price of a bullet.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
23 Jun 07
Well, I don't know about being taken out and shot. I'm sure the terrorists would be happy to ablige though. ;~D
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
26 Jun 07
Excellent Point!
@Modestah (11177)
• United States
26 Jun 07
"freedom fighters" not fighters for freedom, but against it. I guess it is not such a misnomer after all.
@gardengrrl (1445)
• United States
15 Jun 07
I haven't heard this particular phrase applied in this context yet, but if I did, I would be asking the person who said it what their effing problem is. It is a horrible insult to our brave military people, who only obey the orders of those in charge. You know that we disagree about a lot of things, especially Iraq, but on this issue I'm right there with you. Protest the war, call our leaders idiots, email Congress to make it stop, whatever, its all good. But don't lay this dreadful aspersion, this mortal insult, even if only by implication, on our troops. They don't deserve that s**t!
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
16 Jun 07
Freedom Fighter is used by the far left. The Michael Moore, Cindy Whatsitsname and Cesar Chavez crowd.
1 person likes this
• United States
17 Jun 07
gangs of dolts who prevent sensible discourse on the problem, both the far left and the far right. They both make so damn much noise that we fairly sensible folks scattered around the middle just can't be heard!
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
18 Jun 07
It' my opinion that those who want to be heard usually are, those who aren't heard usually aren't willing to speak out as loud.