Tony Blair and George Bush Should Be Tried For War Crimes

we don't know the full story..though yes, that doesn't change the fact that they've sent troops off to war and killed a load of innocent people. I really don't want to dislike them, but facts are facts..they've done criminal things during their terms. If anything I'd like them to be barred from doing any more damage.

If they are, then every national leader who has been in power during a war should also be tried in your kangaroo court.

I think Blair was just going along out of some sort of pressure or allegiance/alliance. I don't think he ever thought things would evole out as they have. Granted, spinelessness is no defence but they guy had good intentions at least....At the end of the day, I tired of hearing about & hearing from, the BOTH of them.

If this is the case, then so should bill clinton, 99% of congress and the leaders of the intelligence agencies in 7 coutries. they all looked at the same things and came to the same conclusions. I challenge you to put up one shed of evidence that could be used to bring charges in accordance with international law and the policies if the hauge or U.N. there is absolutely no crime that is chargable in this and never will be. Perhaps then margerate thatcher should be brought on war crimes charges for her actions in ireland? Or perhaps Bill clinton should charged for his actions in Bosnia, he sent troups in to a country that didnt attack us either. I ask, no BEG you to explain the difference. Lie just doesnt fit here, as I said, everyone looked at the same stuff and saw the same thing. If you try one, you have to try over a thousand. good luck.

I agree. And it's interesting that they found some middle easterner guy and entitled him as the Mastermind of 911. the news is playing only partial of a tape and in no way does he say that he did it. It's criminal. I cannot stomach George Bush and never could.

You have got to be kidding me. Would you like to expand on your reasons why you think these two men who have worked hard to rid the world of terrorism should be tried as war criminals? The one's that should be tried as simple criminals are those who can't find it in their hearts to support our troops both American and British and other members of the coalition in Iraq and Afghanistan. They are doing their best to do the job right. Granted, the intelligence reports from both countries may have been a bit awkward, I still strongly believe that there are WMD's. The question is where are they and if they have been moved, how come our satellites did not pick up on the movements. The only thing that I do not agree with is the Immigration Bill and this is something that the President is going to have work on and think long and hard on as well. I do believe that Tony Blair will make a great Mid East Envoy and will do all that he can to bring some kind of peace in that region. It is not an easy region to work with, but who knows.

What the heck are you talking about. Nothing President Bush or PM Tony Blair has done is criminal. I challenge you to prove your discussion. I bet you can't. This is probably why you only have 50. Sorry but I can't stand Johnny-come-lately who write whatever, no matter how idiotic it sounds. You can't backup what you say. Write on what you can defend. The Hague was designed for actual war crimes. Are you tring to say Bush and/or Blair are in the same league as Hitler and his Nazis. Of course you do. If you don't agree with someone you call them a Nazi. If you can't defend yourself just call the person you disagree with a Nazi. Come on, your probably a smart person, I would love to read your defense.

I agree with you. The two war criminals have caused so many deaths of the innocent people, especially Little Bush. He always finds excuses to attack another country by force, the purpose of which is obvious enough for everyone to see clearly---for the oil that it needs. They should be both sent to jail for the crimes they have made to the people.

In any war, you can't do away with innocent blood. It will be impossible. It should not have happened if only the United Nations did its job. But UN did not do its job, somebody has to do it. UN was organized for that job. US can't just be mute and blind for the sufferings of the innocent civilians being killed in Iraq and Afghanistan and elsewhere in the world. Being a world power has also responsibility to help this people being persecuted by their leader. If US and Britain will not do it, who will?