Will you join me in boycotting the US 2008 Presidential Primary Season?

United States
June 25, 2007 6:49pm CST
Would you ever choose to boycott the Presidential Primary Season to send a message to politicians that you are fed up with partisanship and lack of effective leadership and accomplishment on the part of both the House , Senate and the Executive Branch? Why or why not? Do you have another way to make a point? For dates for your state see www.thegreenpapers.com/P08/ If you are a citizen of another country don't feel left out ..please express your opinion and please share how you would voice your discontent in your own country.
1 person likes this
6 responses
• United States
26 Jun 07
I want to be pro-active in making changes as boycotts do not work and take time away from making positive changes. I have been politically active in making changes for children on related issues. It takes skills, abilities and knowledge of the issues to enact positive changes.
1 person likes this
• United States
26 Jun 07
Oh no no no.. You can't include the last line of your answer without specifics . Whats the solution or the means to a solution you are alluding to.
• United States
27 Jun 07
Oh You are bringing back memories. When I was first out of college and FT for 12 years after I worked with Mentally challenged adults and children. Most of the time was spent with dually diagnosed individuals with not only developmental challenges but who had a Mental Health diganosis as well. I was very involved in lobbying and reaching out to comunities to help them understand their new neighbors. I once travelled with a parents group to Albany NY to protest cuts in funding that would reduce the level of supervision the state was willing to provide for their children. I got to speak with a few aides only and then we had our meeting with the Speaker cancelled when another protest group broke through security and threw themselves on the floor and I am pretty sure was responsible for the bomb threat that was soon after called in. I was very passionate and loved all my residents even the ornery ones. Ok especially the ornery ones. I still try to stay involved but I burnt out and I am ashamed to say I went to work for the "man" in a large corporate environment. I miss social services so much and I understand your point completely. Now you can see that I have done a complete 180 and lost my faith in our system of government. That is why I had to find a new field of work. I had lost my sparkle. I hope you never do!
• United States
27 Jun 07
Sorry, what I meant is study what it is that you want changed and then start talking/writing/calling your state representative and legislators. My issues are primarily actively seeking change for special needs children and the mentally ill. It takes hours or time and research and then it takeas many people to join in the fight for change. Change is slow until more people understand the need. Look at Iraq. Look at the environmental issues. Medical care. I have a friend's son that needs surgery on his heart to live and their insurance has denied it. They do not have the 500K the hospital demands. John Hopkins is evaluating him in August but NO SURGERY until money in place. Just examples of politics in action-or not.
• United States
29 Jun 07
No, I will not boycott the primary elections as there are candidates running that I definately do not want to be president. You are not going to get every US Citizen to not vote. So what you are going to be left with are people that do not agree with your views voting on our presidential candidates. If you really feel strongly about something you should be exercising your right to vote not abstaining from voting. It's one thing to dislike the presidential candidates and making an educated decision not to vote. But this is the primaries. You people that aren't voting the primaries are going to be the same people complaining that you don't like either candidate when it comes to the election. If you really want legislation changed you should be writing to the senate and represenatives because the president doesn't make laws - he just enforces them. Congress is where laws are made - and they are supposed to work for the people. So if you have a problem take it up with them.
1 person likes this
• United States
3 Jul 07
I know that writing your elected officials is the solution that was given in High School Civics class but I've only seen it work marginally at the local level. The parties will choose who they want anyway regardless of the primaries. Again I think some of you are missing the point I am only talking about using the primaries to send a message not the election. Its the parties I want to send a message to not the President. This is the only thing they care about and so that's where we can make a point about the wastefullness of partisan tactics. The parties are the ones that force elected officials to focus on sabotaging the other party, raising money and winning seats rather than being effective. Since they will disregard our choices anyway we don't have to feed into their little game and allow them to declare a clear mandate by choosing one candidate over another.
@eaforeman6 (8979)
• United States
26 Jun 07
It looks like to get healthcare and all thee other issues resolved, its going to take something like this......especialy when year after year these problems continue....maybe we should have done this long ago....what are the options in order to finaly get some results for the poor and the working people....?
• United States
26 Jun 07
Oh the working middle class ---we are screwed!!. I think the best we can do is not give them the impression that we like one over another. I would like to hear alternatives but I am frustrated and this is all I've got. thanks for responding.
1 person likes this
@KingCold (29)
• United States
26 Jun 07
I say we revolt and bring the whole system down. Start getting names of people who are messing up the US and black list them. Don't vote for them, endorse them and publicly call them on their inability to lead OUR country in a manner that suits US. They are borrowing our rights to ensure our safety and I DON"T FEEL SAFE OR SECURE. So I say we take them back. Down with Capitalism, NEW WORLD ORDER!
• United States
26 Jun 07
Whoa!! I can see you are dressed for world conquest. I am also all for making sure certain politicians don't get to life high off the public "dole" for being ineffective, but the solution is to get out of the way of capitalism not destroy it with an ever increasing union and socialist agenda. There are enough laws to keep industry in check we just have to enforce them. I agree they have to prove probable cause to spy on us legally. Let's just start by sending a message and then decide on a less drastic next step other than plunging the entire country into anarchy. I do like your passion though.
• United States
26 Jun 07
It's a deal !!At the first sign they are out of line .. they are all yours and I will have your back!!!
• United States
26 Jun 07
....Maybe you are right. Fanaticism is only useful when properly directed. I will do my best to send a calm, collected and calculated message to the powers that be. Lead by example and not let injustice stand by supporting the laws that help society. But I will polish my armor, should they decide to step out of line.
• United States
26 Jun 07
By not voting you will insure the status quo..the Republicans will vote no matter what the rest of the people do or do not do..this is how Bush got elected ..not once..but twice.. I hear what you are saying..and I feel your frustrastion..but stop and think what message the typical politicians would read into this boycott. The repulicans will win by default..no health care and no help for anyone but the elite. if the democrats would get elected..more "entitlements" and higher taxes..for everyone ...so you are (screwed) if you do you are (screwed_:( if you don't yes, we are screwed..so do what ever you feel like.. thanks for asking something that has been on my mind..politics is so frustrating...
1 person likes this
• United States
26 Jun 07
By not voting you will insure the status quo..the Republicans will vote no matter what the rest of the people do or do not do..this is how Bush got elected ..not once..but twice.. I hear what you are saying..and I feel your frustrastion..but stop and think what message the typical politicians would read into this boycott. The repulicans will win by default..no health care and no help for anyone but the elite. if the democrats would get elected..more "entitlements" and higher taxes..for everyone ...so you are (screwed) if you do you are (screwed_:( if you don't yes, we are screwed..so do what ever you feel like.. thanks for asking something that has been on my mind..politics is so frustrating...
• United States
26 Jun 07
With the country so divided I am not sure any party would win an election by default. However the primaries are just to determine the voters preference for nominees. The parties themselves can choose whomever they want to run on their own parties ticket. Primaries pit members of the same party against one another. So there is not an instance during primaries where one party would win over the other. I do understand your point we should never boycott an actual election we should make our vote count in that instance. Not voting would distort the message being sent.
• United States
28 Jun 07
Its only that you are an adult now. You will not be swayed by a President who is treated like a rock star by the media. I hope we never have a President like that again. The President should be quietly competent and not draw so much attention to their persona.
• United States
29 Jun 07
right. With maturity comes a different view on life. JFK really did not do anything while he was in the office..but he gave the illusion that he was "getting this country moving again." LBJ did far more for civil rights and viet nam. NIxon got us into China..a dubious accomplishment. Ford healed the country from Nixon's watergate. Carter we could have done without. I made a lot of money during Reagon, Bush no.41, and Clinton... Now we will have the first women President... it will be different...and Bill will be the First Gentleman..lol