Changing my mind on Iraq

@soccermom (3198)
United States
July 10, 2007 9:52am CST
Well, for some reason I have been paying more and more attention to the conflict in Iraq. Initially, I wasn't for the war to begin with. I still think we shouldn't have invaded Iraq for the reasons we did, but the truth is that we are there and there is a job to be done. I have ranted on here in responses as to why we shouldn't be there and why our troops should come home now, but lately I've been thinking differently. I don't know if I am becoming more informed on the situation or if I am just starting to think about the situation from a different angle. We invaded Iraq and I can't say I justify the reason for the action, but because of our actions we have created a situation that maybe we just shouldn't walk away from. Part of me says this war is unwinnable as most religious wars are. I agree that the Iraqi government really needs to step up, but I'm not sure a full troop withdrawal is the solution anymore. I don't fear the enemy following us into our own backyard, but I do fear the instability that pulling US forces out would inevitably bring. I am not complacent with $3.29 a gallon gas, and I don't want to see prices go up farther. I have been wondering lately why we are so up in arms over the loss of American troops. Yes, loss of life is tragic, and I am selfishly grateful everyday that my hubby was discharged from the Marines 3 weeks before 9/11. But this is a war. Did we really expect not to lose troops? The glamorous marketing campaign our military has aside, our troops volunteered for this. I guess I'm just looking for some feedback here. I don't support Bush, but I am starting to see where we stand in the Middle East, and I'm starting to think my initial thought of "Get our troops out!" may be wrong.
2 people like this
16 responses
@cher913 (25782)
• Canada
10 Jul 07
well i am not american but i do love american history. i cannot help comparing iraq to vietnam different reasons, but perhaps the us should not be there either just like they shouldnt have been in vietnam.
1 person likes this
• United States
10 Jul 07
...Vietnam was the rolling of communism over the people.. But we became halfhearted due to negative news coverage and hype.. so we were half hearted, then we pulled out and thousands were slaughtered.. Terrorism actually has historic ties to communism.. I still go along with Winston Churchill's famous words "the only way for evil" (domination of peoples and the world) "to succeed is for good people to do nothing." - I see it coming! Not only because I understand the Book of Revelation (of the bible) but because the world does not take seriously the threats of world domination and iron fisted rule - which the fallen angels are always using people to work toward and accomplish, but now the world no longer believes in God and the war of good and evil, but that we are all evolving.. and that there really is no evil.. just misunderstanding, and terrorists etc, just need a hug.. This huge tide (sentiment) is not about to recede (until it is too late) therefor I see bad things upon the world's horizon.. and few who recognize it...
1 person likes this
@soccermom (3198)
• United States
10 Jul 07
I realize how easy it is to compare this to Vietnam. However if you really examine both situations there's not a lot to compare. One of the big differences between the two has to do with the stratgic value of the country itself. We had not much to gain in Vietnam, I'm not meaning that to diminish what the situation was over there, I mean that as far as resources go and our own economy it's like comparing apples to oranges. War fare has changed dramatically since Vietnam, and since WWII for that matter, and although I value your opinion, and I'm glad you replied, I just don't see the comparison like I used to.
@cher913 (25782)
• Canada
10 Jul 07
well you are right flower and if you belive in the Bible as I do, then the future looks rather grim for some.
1 person likes this
@sid556 (30960)
• United States
10 Jul 07
I think we owe the iraqui people alot since as you said, we did create this situation.I do not think our being there is helping them in the least. I think we should get our troops out of harms way and look into other ways of helping them. Yes, it does bring back some memories of vietnam.
1 person likes this
@soccermom (3198)
• United States
11 Jul 07
pb_bi, your remark was uncalled for, I read your response too and maybe you should take your own advice. I'm not too sure what we "owe" the Iraqi people. Some seem to welcome our presence, others don't. Maybe we should have an election and find out what the Iraqi majority would like to see happen, if they want us there or not.
1 person likes this
@sid556 (30960)
• United States
11 Jul 07
Thanks for the defense, soccer! I was going to ignore it as any come back I had would have been dripping in sarcasm! I agree....an election would be a good idea! Obviously what we are doing now is not working.
1 person likes this
• India
11 Jul 07
what is your mean. PLEASE explain it or improve you english
@Netsbridge (3253)
• United States
10 Jul 07
Soccermom, you have an implant! Only a remote-controlled agent for the US or British will make such a statement as you just did! Soccermom, somewhere I stated that it is not possible to have been human and support the unjustified invasion of Iraq! The fact that the troops maybe there in Iraq just for their oath of service (in the hopes of fortune and fame) does not change the fact that Iraq was unjustly invaded and people are being unnecessarily killed in an unnecessary war based on lies upon lies! Soccermom, your current decision or position is the result of an agent under the influence (and in this case, under the influence of electronic devices and/or possible unconsented substances!) No, this is not Science Fiction! Please do check out: Human or Robot? - http://www.geocities.com/ulafrique/nanotechnology.html Hi-Tech manipulation - http://www.haarp.net
@soccermom (3198)
• United States
10 Jul 07
Nets, I believe you and I have discussed the HAARP project before, and although I believe it is a possibility I don't know what it has to do with this discussion. I never said I supported the invasion of Iraq, I did say that the deed has been done, we can't just bail out now and expect the consequences won't be dire. Yes it was all unnecessary, but the fact remains that we can't go back and change the fact that we are there, we helped create the mess, we need to do what we should to correct it. Unless of course you know some sort of time travel that would change the course of history and prevent invasion to begin with (eye roll).
• United States
10 Jul 07
And Soccermom, that has also been my point! Did you know that both the US and British governments have a record of messing up or aggrevating matters and then come in later to play the knight on a white horse, regardless of the consequences (although with plundering all along on their minds)? A wrong is a wrong is a wrong!
1 person likes this
@4ftfingers (1310)
11 Jul 07
Yeh I know what you mean. It's a really difficult situation, with no right answer. I think it's right that we should never have taken the war to Iraq, I sort of see the benefits of the Afghan war but there were similar problems in both countries that the Bush Administration were either ignorant of or just didn't see as a major problem. Both countries have many different religions, cultures and tribes that were never united as one. They call everyone who resists our forces, insergents or terrorists. That's just not true. A lot of those resisting our forces don't necissarily agree with the acts of terrorists (in the sense of murdering innocent people), but want to protect their homeland, as any of us would in our own countries. They don't form an official army because we don't allow them to, we want their official army to support our occupation. And I reckon this is why we will never be able to win. To win would be leaving the country with no conflict and that's never been the case, certain religions or cultures have always been oppressed depending on who's in control. That's why they found it so easy to behead Saddam for killing so many people. I can't speak for everyone in these two countries but it seems like they don't respect a single government system like we do. They might want democracy but not on a national scale, not yet. It may be years before they do. I think in truth it was more important for us for Iraq to be a nationally democratic country, because you can't trade with a nation if it's not a nation. I would love to think that our occupation does help Iraq to become a democracy. But I can't see it happening for years.
1 person likes this
13 Jul 07
Yeh definately, I would like to know too. I read in one report that 47% of Iraqis agreed that attacks on coalition forces were justified. So if that's anything to go by it's almost 50-50. Useless information really.
1 person likes this
@soccermom (3198)
• United States
11 Jul 07
I don't see it happening for years either. And this is where my own personal dilemna comes in. On one hand it's like, this is never gonna work, let's vut our losses and bring our troops home, which wouldn't really be cutting our losses if you think of the social and economic ramifications of pulling out now. And on the other hand I'm like, let's see it through, it may take a long time but the end result will be worth it! Maybe. And besides, we started this. And I would love to know if the majority of Iraqi's want us there or not.
• United States
11 Jul 07
My husband is a Marine and has been on deployments to Iraq. According to his own experience and what he has seen there so far...no, the Iraqis are not ready yet to handle things on their own. There is too much civil unrest now in the country. Not so much of Iraqis fighting with US but more of Iraqis fighting Iraqis. If they pull out all the troops now, the country will be in in shambles. I also don't agree with how the war started and don't think all the reasons for invasion were justified. But like what you said, what is done is done. So, to pull out the troops now would be an even bigger mistake and very irresponsible. I think we have to finish what we started whether we like it or not. I don't like the idea of my husband having to go for another tour to Iraq end of this year. But I do know that it's important for them to help the Iraqi government now. It's a slow process and the datelines they have put forward are so unrealistic...that's why we keep missing them. There is so much more work to be done there. I read in another anti-war post where a reader commented that it's sad that the troops actually think that they are dying for freedom and the country. I'm like "wwwhhhatttt???!!!" I don't think what my husband is doing is in vain. He's a wonderful Marine, proud American and a wonderful family man and I'm very proud of him. And yes, he CHOSE to do this. And I support him 100% not because I support the war or anything but I love and support my husband.
1 person likes this
@soccermom (3198)
• United States
11 Jul 07
Thank you for your response!! I was hoping to hear from some people with active members of the military in their family to see how they felt. I'm sure it's hard with your hubby away, but it's also nice to know that you see a purpose behind his absence, and are not spiteful because of it.
• United States
11 Jul 07
Thank you. It's easy for me to be selfish and say just keep my husband here but I know when he signed on the dotted line, he is one who is willing to lay down his life for freedom and his country.
1 person likes this
@EvanHunter (4026)
• United States
12 Jul 07
I cant see anything good coming of staying longer. You look at whats going on now and its worse now than it was. I still think if we stay for another 20 years Iraq will be a hot spot even than. Wont it be an even bigger waste of human lives if we wait till than to pull out? So my opinion is we need a plan, its either we are going to get someone in office there who is gona get the job done so the Iraqis can start to pick up the slack or worry about our own problems. You can only fight someone elses battles for so long. I know everyone keeps thinking oh this will end up just like being having bases in Germany or Japan after WW2 but I dont ever see it being like that. I can understand the multitude of reasons why we should stay, fight terrorism there instead of here, keep oil sold in US dollars so our economy doesnt collapse, better we control the worlds oil sources than China or another country, trying to bring about a real democratic society to be an example in the middle east for other nations to follow. Even after I look at all these things I still have to wonder what the long term effects here at home are going to be. Shoudlnt we worry first about our own citizens over big business and other countries? Everyone seems to forget what happened in the former soviet union and how they were finanacially drained out from the war in afghanistan. I dont think even if a democrat gets in to the oval office it will bring an end to the war because I am sure that whoever gets in will probly be backed by big oil also. But in all this and our billions we have spent on keeping us safe from terror, what has been done to protect us at home? Anyone could drive a convoy of explosives accross the mexican border and no one seems to care so how much is it really to do with freedom and terrorism? You said you know its a loss of human life but its a war after all well what about this http://www.costofwar.com/ seems to me we couldve done alot better for our nation and its citizens than what we are doing right now.
@soccermom (3198)
• United States
12 Jul 07
I agree with you on some things here Evan. WE should worry about our own citizens first and not big oil and other countries. But we helped fuel the mess in Iraq. There is no easy solution to this. One of my biggest fears is that we pull out before Homeland Security gets their act together, oil prices skyrocket to the point where we are at an economic ruin, etc... What are we supposed to do? Become an all inclusive nation? I don't think this war is "winnable" either, but we do need to come up with a plan, enforce it, and have some stability in the region before we pull out totally.
• United States
13 Jul 07
Agreed the best course of action to any war is a plan, umm when we gona see one???
1 person likes this
@Lakota12 (42600)
• United States
11 Jul 07
Yup I think so to. I read some where,where they think if we pull allthe way out before their Gav. is really stable that it would just go into a civil war and would be worse than now.Wouldnt it be nice if they could all come together and talk like we all do here in mylot and got along with each other would be better that what they are doing to each other. The Iraqi seem to think this is a holy war. I really dont think that had anything with us going in there to help these people out . I know all the junck about WMD but think about it we gave them a whole month notice that we were coming. They had plenty of time to move it we wasnt surpose to find any!
1 person likes this
@Marie2473 (8512)
• Sweden
11 Jul 07
I am not american so it is hard for me to really put myself in your shoes, however the general opinion over here is that u should have stayed out. That u got what you wanted after Saddam, however if u leave now you will leave an unstable country that somehow does rely on you to help them rebuild it again. I am actually not sure what I feel, and I am also not sure what would happen if the troops did leave.. At the same time, you can not be there forever and this seems as it has been going on forever =(
1 person likes this
@babykay (2131)
• Ireland
13 Jul 07
Soccermom you have put this very eloquently, I posted a similar discussion before you and I suppose I too question the wisdom of pulling out of Iraq right now. It would play right in to al Queada's hands. They should at least finish what they started. Personally I don't give a hoot about oil/gas costs from my own point of view, but it seems like a time for us to consider going greener.
1 person likes this
@soccermom (3198)
• United States
13 Jul 07
You're lucky you don't have to worry about gas prices. I remember when I was complaining about $1.87 a gallon, now I WISH it was that cheap! My hubby and I try our best to watch how much gas we use, and we recycle a home, have energy efficient light bulbs, etc...I even considered riding my bike 5 miles to my office everyday, but with 3 kids to get to childcare it's just not possible.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
10 Jul 07
That's one of the things I like about you, Soccermom... we rarely agree on much, but I can respect you and your opinions. Being willing to change your mind when the facts convince you to is a rare thing. Thank you for being one who can.
1 person likes this
@soccermom (3198)
• United States
10 Jul 07
I blame my father! LOL Thank you for what I consider a compliment, and I have to admit Para I have been looking for your discussions more and more. Although we always don't (if rarely) agree, you are what I consider to be an educated individual, able to see things for what they are without falling into hype.
@MrNiceGuy (4141)
• United States
10 Jul 07
Good to hear. I believe you are right with the whole not abandoning Iraq thing, it would make it worse than before. But I have a qualm with the term "religious war". It is not a religious war.
1 person likes this
@soccermom (3198)
• United States
10 Jul 07
I wasn't saying it's a religious war, but religon does play into it. The terrorists are radical Islamists that hate the west for it's freedoms and one could assume religious beliefs. Have you heard of one jihadist that was a self proclaimed Christian? Of course not. All the terror they cause is in the name of Allah.
• United States
11 Jul 07
I am probable wrong but I thought that after Saddam was disposed of and the Iraqis held their own elections we would stay long enough with our military support until they were able to take care of themselves. I also thought that there had been a deadline set for this and it has now passed. If this is correct then all we are doing is babysitting them at a cost of our military lives. If I'm wrong please set me straight.
1 person likes this
@soccermom (3198)
• United States
11 Jul 07
You're not wrong whiteheather. Initially the plan was to stay long enough so that they could take care of themselves. I guess my question is can they take care of themselves? They can't be expected to hit every benchmark, but it appears they are not doing a good job on achieving them depending on who you ask. I'm reminded of a boss I once had years ago who told me that it dodn't matter how hard I tried or how much effort I put in if I didn't have the appropriate tools and knowledge to do my job, and he was there to be sure I had the appropriate tools and knowledge. So I guess my question to all of this is are we giving them the tools and knowledge they need to succeed? Or are we just handing them the ball and assuming they should know what to do with it?
@KrisNY (7590)
• United States
16 Jul 07
This is a hard one for me- I would love to see the troops come home- All of them- today! My brother states different- He knows he is there for a reason- It’s his duty as an American- and a Soldier- He is 37- a father of 3- and a husband, son, sister, dad, uncle, etc. It’s hard having him gone- He is a lifer- He will put in 20 years and then retire- He went to Saudi during Desert Storm- He went to NYC also- Now he is in Iraq- Sure he volunteered to join the Army- He wanted to protect us here in the states and the best way to do that was to become a Soldier- Did he ask to go to Iraq to fight some religious war?? NO—I would gladly pay $5 a gallon of gas to have him home- safe- so his kids didn’t have to worry anymore- and my mom could finally sleep a full night peacefully without worrying about her son- It is hard on families as well as the soldiers- I say bring them home- It’s time!
@sandwedge (1339)
• Malaysia
11 Jul 07
correct me if i am wrong, but if we make a mistake, we fix it before walking away. yes? if that is the case, i am with you. not many are for the war, if any. but the issue now is do we turn our back on a country the needed our help more than ever now, because of the position we put them in?
1 person likes this
@soccermom (3198)
• United States
11 Jul 07
Exactly sandwedge! I'm not sure we're to blame for the whole situation, but we sure compounded it. I do think we have a responsibility to fix it before walking away, but I also feel we should hold the Iraqi government to their responsibility to help.
@pismeof (855)
• United States
10 Jul 07
Pulling out of IRAQ is a bad idea;Just imagine the haven this would create for the Al-Quida with an unstable Iraq.I do believe that it may be time for their government to step up and maybe we need to change some of our strategies to acheive the ultimate goal of a more stable country ;But pulling out is not the answer. Why don't we just set up border patrols and let the internal fight take place for a bit . Put their fate into the peoples hands like a real democracy and I'd bet we'd see results alot quicker and force the government into action .
• India
11 Jul 07
it is not true usa is great cheater . HE do war only for oils not for peace. BUSH is also a terror
1 person likes this