What if human start laying eggs instead of giving birth to a baby?

@lavkul (472)
India
July 12, 2007 10:31am CST
Do you guys think that life would be easier if human starts laying eggs? I mean to say birth would be an easy process..am I rite?
2 people like this
4 responses
@Anniedup (3651)
• Richards Bay, South Africa
12 Jul 07
Oh lord please No! We are over populated as it is, and any means of making it easier will just contribute to a huge problem as it is! Can you just imagine! Even the cycle would be reduced from 9 months to 6 or 8 weeks!
@lavkul (472)
• India
14 Jul 07
Ur rite..but looks so funny na.
@wilynn (751)
• Singapore
12 Jul 07
This is interesting. It could save the woman a lot of trouble and make her life easier if we were to just lay eggs. How about having the men to incubate the eggs after the woman lays it. :D
@lavkul (472)
• India
16 Jul 07
o yes...u r rite.
@rhinoboy (2129)
12 Jul 07
I think despite the discomfort of pregnancy and the extreme pain of birth, most women would opt to keep things the way they are. You would miss out on all the bonding that goes on in the womb. Besides that - we're mammals! Our eggs are less than a milimetre wide and grow immediately into live babies. You'd have to build an awfully fancy incubator!
@Dan_ul (858)
• Romania
12 Jul 07
that's a very stupid question... I'm sorry pal but is the true... I know that mylot is getting more boring every day but still... I have to admit that I didn't ever think of something like that, cos is stupid;)
@lavkul (472)
• India
22 Jul 07
Thanks for reponse.