breast cancer
cancer
chemicals
food additives
preservatives
processed foods
risk factors
soy
western diet
What If They Are Interpreting The Data Wrong?
By speakeasy
@speakeasy (4171)
United States
July 12, 2007 4:47pm CST
I read another article today stating how a "Western diet" increases breast cancer risk (and the risk of other cancers). I think we all have heard these results before - no surprise there.
But, as I continued reading the article about the two groups of women that they studied; they actually listed the differences in the diets, and I noticed a MAJOR difference in these diets that the researchers FAILED to mention.
The one diet was called "meat-sweet" and was high in red meat, shrimp, fish, candy, desserts, bread and milk".
The second diet was called "vegetable-soy" and it was high in tofu, vegetables, sprouts, beans, fish, and soy milk".
Now, I, personnally, have a food sensitivity that includes a lot of different foods; so, I have to be very careful and read labels closely. What I very quickly spotted was the simple fact that the "vegetable- soy" diet is almost totally UNPROCESSED foods. These unprocessed foods contain very few artifical "food additives". The "meat-sweet" diet is highly processed and contains a TON of flavor enhancers, artifical colors, preservatives, emulsifiers, etc. Read any candy bar wrapper or bread wrapper; the chemical names listed are unpronounceable and sometimes are just plain abbreviated (BHA, BHT, etc) and they make up a LOT of the listed ingrediants.
So, maybe it is not "meat-sweet" that is increasing the cancer risk. If the meats are unprocessed and the "sweets" were homemade with natural ingrediants; would there still be the same difference in cancer risk.
I am 51 years old and I am salicylate sensitive; which means that my diet is limited and a lot of what I can eat HAS to be made from scratch. I am unable to eat 80% of the vegetables and 90% of the fruits available. I have to stay away from most preservatives. Even with my restricted diet; my doctor is amazed at how healthy I am. I have NO other health problems with the exception of this particular food allergy and the only medication I take is an occasional over-the-counter antihistamine. At my age, there are not a lot of women (or men) who can make that claim.
So, maybe, we just need to get the chemicals out of our food and eat REAL unprocessed food to reduce our cancer risk.
What do you think?
1 person likes this
1 response
@redyellowblackdog (10629)
• United States
13 Jul 07
Ever hear of the book, "HOW TO FIGHT CANCER AND WIN" by William L. Fisher? It is a fact book about cancer. It contains a lot of what is known about the disease. The parts about how to prevent cancer are really interesting. If I understood those parts correctly you are probably right about processed vs unprocessed foods. The book contains quite a bit about how doctors fight the disease, what is known really, and what kind of studies have been done you don't hear much about. There is no magical cure in the book, but there is a lot of really good information.
@speakeasy (4171)
• United States
13 Jul 07
No, I have not heard of that book. So far, cancer has not been a problem for my immediate family and I have concentrated more on our own problems (ADHD, allergies, Aspergers, diabetes, and salicylate sensitivity) than other peoples problems.
From the title of the book, I probably would not have picked it up unless I knew someone who needed to or was fighting cancer.
But, since the 1960's there has been a major increase in all diseases and it is a PERCENTAGE increase; not, just an increase in numbers. That was also when highly processed foods started to really hit the markets; with the breakfast cereals, TV dinners, etc.
There have been a lot of fingers pointed at MSG which also started being used at that time and it does affect a lot of people in a lot of ways that they are unaware of - http://www.msgtruth.org/
Then; problems with saccharine and aspartame starting in the 70's. But, I am starting to wonder if these other "food additives" are not just as bad; just slower and more subtle in their effect. It could also be the combinations of these additives that are causing the problem.
http://www.cspinet.org/reports/chemcuisine.htm
It is really hard to tell unless the effect is pretty immediate and with so many additives in combination in the foods; that would make it even harder to identify the cause; especially, if no one is looking in that area.
The lack of "looking" is what is scary. You can't find anything out if you never look at it.
1 person likes this
@redyellowblackdog (10629)
• United States
13 Jul 07
The book contains quite a bit about food and how diet can prevent many diseases in addition to cancer, though cancer is the primary focus.
I know you are right about msg, too. My wife gets really bad headaches from msg so she avoids it like a disease.


