Should Man Utd sell Heinze to Liverpool?

Malaysia
July 26, 2007 10:00am CST
I have 1 question,should Manchester United sell Heinze to Liverpool or keep him until his contracts run out. for me, i think Heinze is fantastic and Manchester should keep him and not selling to any other club. What do you think?
1 person likes this
7 responses
@MrManUtd (53)
• Ireland
29 Jul 07
keep him
• Malaysia
29 Jul 07
yeah, man u should keep him...
• China
27 Jul 07
i think heinze is a good player.i don't know why the coach doesn't like him and club will sell him.in my opinion,heinze shouldn't be sold to liverrpool,the reason is simple:history.liverpool is our enemy for long time.we can't endure our good player transfer to enemy club .if he transfer to r.madrid or other league's club,i will support him,like van nistlrooy.
• Malaysia
27 Jul 07
yeah,Heinze is a good player indeed. but ,unfortunately,the coach prefer Evra than Heinze. Yeah you right. Liverpool is our enemy forever and sell good player to enemy would be unwise especially the likes of liverpool.
@id_pop (293)
• Philippines
29 Jul 07
That's easy. Heinze is a great player and that said, Manchester United should do its best to keep him and Liverpool should likewise make every effort to acquire him. Whichever team ends up with him on the roster will be lucky to have a good defender on their side.
@binny29 (1527)
• India
29 Jul 07
no he shdnt be let go that easy because he played and important part in manu success last year and hope he doesnt go to liverpool thate eassily
• China
29 Jul 07
sell Heinze and get money it is a very goood choice
@Puffer (92)
• Singapore
31 Jul 07
I agree with you. But if Heinze were to leave Man U, Sir Alex must let him go as there's no point keeping a player who's heart is not with the club. BUT, he should never be allowed to go to Liverpool! Benitez should be going after Spanish defenders.
@ram_cv (16513)
• India
27 Jul 07
I have always felt that you should let a player go when he feels that he is not happy with the club. The Heinze situation is developing in a similar fashion, but Man U are holding onto him. I guess the rationale is that they do not want to sell him to Liverpool, they would rather sell him to a weaker club or another league. As long as they are able to get another club, I think that should be fine, but otherwise it might be better to offload him to Liverpool. He is a good player no doubt, but he is not a great player and Man U definitely have cover in that position!! Cheers! Ram