a few good questions relating to 9/11...

Canada
August 3, 2007 10:20am CST
how did the World trade center 1 and 2 fall? why did world trade center 7 fall? why not release the tapes of the pentagon crash? why avoid the warnings of france, germany and pakistan? why was there molten lava found under the WTCs 1, 2 and 3 weeks after the fall? why was the WTC7 reported to have fallen before it fell? Why did BUSH SR have a meeting with osama's brother in the morning of 9/11? Why does it say that the financier of 9/11 is "of little importance" in the Commission report? why did we go to iraq? Why did norad have 80 different missions going on, on that particular date? why couldnt norad separate the REAL WORLD from the exercise missions? why is there no plane, but only very small pieces, at the site of the flight 93 crash? why do other very similar crashes still have the engines in tact with huge body parts? Why are there so many questions unanswered?
2 people like this
5 responses
• Thailand
20 Aug 07
http://www.pointlesswasteoftime.com/911truth.html Follow this link if you want your questions answered. The first page will give you the truth about the rather sad video "Lose Change" and if that does not convince you go to the second page to see just how retarded the whole conspiracy theory is.
1 person likes this
• Canada
20 Aug 07
i really dont care about loose change and after i went to your link and saw the comparison between that guy who made the movie and the asian guy i stopped looking through cuz i knew it was not a professional site.. loose change proposes some things that there is no proof for but it does ask the simple questions.. the problem is it replaces it with half truths.. and no, these questions are not answered properly by anyone. i have seen the 9/11 rebuttal's and i am not convinced. and this is beyond a couple of crappy documentaries and a couple of crappy rebuttal documentaries. these questions have been unanswered by both sides.. and how the building fell is still being studied through physical laws etc... but i gota say, i was shocked when the buildings fell.. i never thought that would happen... have you seen these buildings? they are huge. there is no way that a Boeing could bring it down.
1 person likes this
• Canada
24 Aug 07
but chiang, you need to at least acknowledge WTC 7.. i mean, reported that it fell before it fell?
@sunshinecup (7880)
3 Aug 07
I wish I had those answers, but I don't and that is why it's so hard for me to take 9/11 at face value. I think until these questions are answered, many won’t. I just dearly hope with new president in the White House, this case will be reopened and the results will become public.
1 person likes this
• Canada
6 Aug 07
i think the men behind the curtain have power on both sides of politics.
2 people like this
@breepeace (3024)
• Canada
3 Aug 07
The only one of those that I CAN answer is the one about Flight 93 -- a one ton engine part survived the near vertical impact and was found a distance away, as well as what appeared to be an entire whole other engine also found a distance away. 757 pilots have been saying since the attacks, and this crash, that it IS possible to overstress a 757 to the point where midair breakup would be possible, but they aren't sure how as it was never built into simulators or measured. Flying at a low altitude at a high speed MIGHT be enough to overstress the aircraft. Jet engine mounts ARE designed to break away before the wing does. Although a bomb onboard MIGHT have caused the stress, eyewitness accounts don't seem to indicate this. The plane did not explode in midair, it simply stopped and plummeted into the ground, doing a sort of nosedive.
1 person likes this
20 Aug 07
There you go, questions that have never been answered and they have got away with it. Have you seen Loose Change. Some people believe in this conspiracy, while other do not. Until the US government becomes straight with their answers I will continue to believe this theory, it just all adds up. Heres the link if you haven't seen it. http://www.loosechange911.com/lc2e.htm
1 person likes this
@agnescav (566)
• United States
9 Aug 07
I was up there last week. They were supposed to take five years to clean that up but started re-building way too fast. This is irreverent but it just looks like a construction site to me!
• Canada
9 Aug 07
you know, it is very relevant... do you know how fat they started cleaning the rubble up? i dont know why they did not examine the evidence in the rubble... then they expect us to believe that the passports of the alleged hijackers fell on the ground right where the CIA can get them? after it destroyed how many black boxes, a piece of paper can survive?
2 people like this
• United States
17 Aug 07
I completely second the motion. How can you say it is irrelevant. Our government has used these attacks to completely launch a war for the sake of building their own wallets and consuming whatever power they can. You will only continue to be a drone, lead blindless if you cannot see that everything and everyone (especially those who are in a position to determine your fate) needs to be questioned.
1 person likes this
@agnescav (566)
• United States
21 Aug 07
I did mean what i said. I think it is irreverent that i think it looks like nothing but a construction site to me. I think it is very relevant that they started building so fast. I cannot imagine what kind of, not only evidence, bodies, information is being covered up. But also toxins.