Which would you prefer in a spouse? Good provider or very protective?

United States
August 17, 2007 1:50pm CST
When choosing a mate or spouse, do you stop for a minute to think of the most basic characteristics that would make that person suitable for you? If we look back to prehistoric days, how would a woman have made her decision on suitable spouse? Would she have simply chosen a man based on his looks, or something more substantial like his ability to defend his family or be a good provider? Not a lot of things have changed since prehistoric times. As women we still want to feel safe, whether that safety comes from money or protection. I suppose if I had to choose one trait that I'd want in a potential spouse, then I would definitely say that I would want him to be a good provider. However many women would say that it's more important to find a man that could stick up for them and provide protection. Assuming those were the only two choices that you had to make, which trait would you prefer in your potential spouse or mate? Would you prefer that he be able to protect you from physical danger or provide financially so that you and your children would not perish?
3 responses
• United States
18 Aug 07
I don't need either quality from a man since I have self-defense training and a graduate degree, so I guess I'd chose the one with the nicest equipment. That's what matters to me in terms of mate selection. I think prehistoric women probably got raped a lot. Not much choosing going on there, if you know what I mean. Sorry, but I don't think I'll live my life by Unga's guidelines.
• United States
17 Aug 07
I think I would ultimatly have to choose a guy who is very protective. Like you said, I like feeling safe. A guy who is protective, and not possessive, is a great person. And being protective, he is providing something that is very important.
@ranitam22 (1146)
• United States
17 Aug 07
I think I would want my man to be a good provider. As a woman living in 2007, I think I do a pretty good job of protecting myself for the most part. But what I don't need is a man who cannot provide me with anything or has no ambitions. That in the long run will have an adverse effect. Who wants to be with a man that sits on his butt, but if a burglar comes or a gang tries to get you in a dark alley, he can handle it? How many times does that happen. Tell me if I answered your question or if I was way off.