Hideous New Weapon Of War

United States
August 27, 2007 8:12pm CST
As if war and the waging of war was not barbaric enough there is a brand new weapon on the scene that ratchet death to gory new heights. This thing literally fries the lungs out of the bodies of the person hit, be it civilian or target as there seems invariably collateral damage in every blast. (I'm posting the article to keep MyLotters safe from malware and viruses) Here is the quote from the article: A new 'super-weapon' being supplied to British soldiers in Afghanistan employs technology based on the "thermobaric" principle which uses heat and pressure to kill people targeted across a wide air by sucking the air out of lungs and rupturing internal organs. The so-called "enhanced blast" weapon uses similar technology used in the US "bunker busting" bombs and the devastating bombs dropped by the Russians to destroy the Chechen capital, Grozny. Such weapons are brutally effective because they first disperse a gas or chemical agent which is lit at a second stage, allowing the blast to fill the spaces of a building or the crevices of a cave. When the US military deployed a version of these weapons in 2005, DefenseTech wrote an article titled, "Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon." According to the US Defense Intelligence Agency, which released a study on thermobaric weapons in 1993, "The [blast] kill mechanism against living targets is unique--and unpleasant.... What kills is the pressure wave, and more importantly, the subsequent rarefaction [vacuum], which ruptures the lungs. If the fuel deflagrates but does not detonate, victims will be severely burned and will probably also inhale the burning fuel. Since the most common FAE fuels, ethylene oxide and propylene oxide, are highly toxic, undetonated FAE should prove as lethal to personnel caught within the cloud as most chemical agents." A second DIA study said, "shock and pressure waves cause minimal damage to brain tissue... it is possible that victims of FAEs are not rendered unconscious by the blast, but instead suffer for several seconds or minutes while they suffocate." "The effect of an FAE explosion within confined spaces is immense," said a CIA study of the weapons. "Those near the ignition point are obliterated. Those at the fringe are likely to suffer many internal, and thus invisible injuries, including burst eardrums and crushed inner ear organs, severe concussions, ruptured lungs and internal organs, and possibly blindness." British defense officials told the UK Guardian that British bombs were "different." "They are optimized to create blast [rather than heat]", one said, speaking on the standard condition of anonymity in Britain. The official added that it would be misleading to call them "thermobaric." Officials told the Guardian the new weapon was classified as a soldier launched "light anti-structure munition" and that the bombs would be more effective because "even when they hit the damage is limited to a confined area." "The continuing issue of civilian casualties in Afghanistan has enormous importance in the battle for hearts and minds," said Liberal Democrat leader Sir Menzies Campbell in the article. "If these weapons contribute to the deaths of civilians then a primary purpose of the British deployment is going to be made yet more difficult." According to Campbell, the deployment of the weapons was not announced to Parliament. Global Research Articles by John Byrne Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Centre for Research on Globalization. To become a Member of Global Research The CRG grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified. The source and the author's copyright must be displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: crgeditor@yahoo.com www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner. For media inquiries: crgeditor@yahoo.com © Copyright John Byrne, Raw Story, 2007 The url address of this article is: www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=6628
1 person likes this
2 responses
@pamcake (276)
• United States
28 Aug 07
That sounds terrible! and very dangerous for anyone around. I feel so bad for all of the innocent people at war (including our soldiers). I would hate for it to come here...I hope we are doing the right things.
1 person likes this
• United States
28 Aug 07
It worries me that this crap can end up in the hands of terrorists. The powers that be CLAIM that their security is "supurb" but then three planes found their way into the world trade center...!
@emisle (3822)
• Ireland
28 Aug 07
It sounds like a really awful way to die...God knows what weapons will exist in 50 years time. It's a pity that so much money is spent on weapons when it could do so much good elsewhere :(
1 person likes this
• United States
28 Aug 07
I just HOPE that we are HERE in 50 years time emisle! I mean I'm really starting to worry quite frankly.