Christians, What If We've Got Some Things Wrong?

United States
August 31, 2007 7:12am CST
What if we Christians, collectively, have some things wrong? Just a shade off? What if the Christian message has been slightly altered over 2000 years? Does this affect how the message is received (or if, it is received)? P.S. - have a good day! :)
4 people like this
8 responses
@anonymili (3138)
31 Aug 07
I'm not a Christian myself but it's good to see that people are open to questioning what they believe are the teachings of their religion. I am a non-practising Hindu and my faith says we should all be peaceful but I have to admit that when my husband annoys me, all thoughts of being peaceful go out of the window! I'm not trying to make light of any religion or anyone's beliefs but do feel that as long as we try to live our life as best we can without hurting anyone along the way God will always be there for us :)
2 people like this
@Drumman (305)
• United States
31 Aug 07
I think a few little thangs have gotten altered. That's obvious by the fact that we have different denominations. Some denominations believe contradictory things and they can't all be right. I can't say my car is red and you say it's black and both of us be right. Someone has to be wrong. The color doesn't really matter though when you get right down to it, as long as the car gets me where I want to go. The small details of Christianity are the same way. They are important, but they don't matter as much as the basic message of Christ and our need to rely on him. I think that has remained intact and still gets across at a lot of churches.
2 people like this
@deebomb (15304)
• United States
2 Sep 07
Flowerchild you have realy give me something to think about. I truly believe that God is in control of his word and as it has been handed down to us he also gave us the Holy Spirit to guide us. Most of the bible proves it's self by repeating it's self over and over again. Most of what Jesus taught was from the old testament. I believe he explained it to make so much of it more clear. I also believe that if we are continually studing his word and praying and living as we know God want us to He will not hold us accountable for things that we don't know. A new born christian is not judged as one that has been in his word for many years.
1 person likes this
• United States
4 Sep 07
I believe His Word is very accurate (except for one mistranslation of one word). But thankfully we have the hebrew and greek concordances to help. So we can look up the original words used. And I know the salvation message is right on the mark. What makes me wonder is how the Word is called a sword.. and I'm thinking that sword should be its sharpest, which is to say, the closer to the truth Christianity and our words, etc, are, the sharper, more effective the sword. In other words, does a little leaven / untruth, dilute the message, making it less effective? And if so, is it possible to root it out?
@Lakota12 (42600)
• United States
31 Aug 07
So many people try to interpet the bible the way they want to that yup I think it might be altered and might be sending a different message than what was meant to be. blessings
1 person likes this
• United States
3 Sep 07
..thank you, it's nice when someone gets your point!:)
@Lakota12 (42600)
• United States
3 Sep 07
your welcome! blessings
@slickcut (8141)
• United States
1 Sep 07
Well i do not know ,we could be a shade off but this is the way I look at it..I have to look to the Bible for all my answers and the only way I can be wrong is if something in the Bible is wrong ..and it is suppose to be our guideline as christians...thats all we have ..So i do whats in there and believe whats in there and GOD knows that we only have his word to go by,so if we are a shade off then God will not hold us accountable..The only way we have to account for things is if we do something that WE know is wrong,but if we do what we feel in our heart and read in his word then i do believe i will be fine with myself and God....So thats all i have to say about that ...
• United States
3 Sep 07
I totally agree with you.. I know the salvation message is right on the mark; and there's only one mistranslation (of one word) that I know of in the Bible. But what I wonder is, the more true our perception of God, and the coming reality, the more true our witness, thus the more effective? Does a little leaven / untruth, dilute the effectiveness of the message?
• India
1 Sep 07
I think we need to exercise faith... for example, atheist may ask what if there is God! well there has to be some amount of faith. And for the muslims, what if we are wrong! well, exercise faith... I think all of us need to reason and study things faithfully, but at the end there will be element of faith in each of us.
1 person likes this
@deebomb (15304)
• United States
1 Sep 07
I believe that when Jesus went to heaven he sent us the Holy spirit to help us and guide us. I believe that the Holy Spirit guided those that translated and put the bible together for us. There are a lot of newer translations out there but if we let the Holy Spirit guide us we will be abel to find and use the right one. He will also convect us if we follow the wrong path.
@sreevasu (2717)
• India
31 Aug 07
Flowerchilde, I am not a christian, I believe all religions are for the betterment of humanity. But I found something wrong in Christianity and it is: Genesis: 26 Then God said, ‘Let us make humankind* in our image, according to our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the wild animals of the earth,* and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the earth.’ 27 So God created humankind* in his image, in the image of God he created them;* male and female he created them. 28 God blessed them, and God said to them, ‘Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it; and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the air and over every living thing that moves upon the earth.’ 29 God said, ‘See, I have given you every plant yielding seed that is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree with seed in its fruit; you shall have them for food. 30 And to every beast of the earth, and to every bird of the air, and to everything that creeps on the earth, everything that has the breath of life, I have given every green plant for food.’ And it was so. 31 God saw everything that he had made, and indeed, it was very good. And there was evening and there was morning, the sixth day. ===================== This is the wrong lesson which Christianity advocates. Every living being has the same rights and no one is superior or inferior. Everyone should respect other lives.
@deebomb (15304)
• United States
1 Sep 07
urbandekay, I did a short research and found at least 2 intereapations of the bible that uses the word humans. You can find most translations of the bible at. A translation makes a lot of differance in how we interpart what we read. http://www.biblegateway.com/
@sreevasu (2717)
• India
31 Aug 07
Urban, Why we should not make it human kind? Humans are just another species living here. I never said that all living things/beings are 'equal'. Yes they are different. But how can you judge that one is superior or inferior than the other? Even if you judge it, it would be just your perspective. For human beings, the world run on their perspective. It need not be like that. Just an example: Lions are supposed to be the King of animals. This is just a human concept. We are not sure that whether lions are aware of this. It is not justifiable in any way to believe that human thought process is the right and real one.
1 person likes this
@urbandekay (18278)
31 Aug 07
Let us make mankind not human kind. Man means person from the old Anglo-Saxon where 'Wap-man' was a male and 'Wif-man' meant female, thus clearly man means person as well as its other use, to mean specifically male. It is wrong of you to rbitarily substitute human kind, since it changes the meaning subtly. A human is a biological term and a human raised without contact with other humans would not be a person, since a person is formed by a human developing socially in contact with a community of people. You conflate several different points, all living things are worthy of respect but that does not necessarily mean they are equal. Clearly in many ways different organisms vary, therefore you would need to make a cogent argument for your dubious claim that they are all equal. all the best urban
1 person likes this