Ossama Bin Laden was never officially charged for the tower destruction
By Shannon
@visitorinvasion (7709)
United States
4 responses
@tigertang (1749)
• Singapore
15 Sep 07
True, he was never fully charged for the murder of innocent civilians in the attack on the towers. However, he and the Al-Qaeda network has become opponents in a war, and so I guess if they were ever caught, Osama and Gang would be tried under a military tribunal rather than through the civilian legal system. Not sure how this would work - would be nice for some legal experts to stir up the debate
@visitorinvasion (7709)
• United States
15 Sep 07
Yes, it would be nice.
It would be nice if we got some real news on national channels.
I mean seriously, who gives a crap about Britney and some lady asked to leave a plane because of her miniskirt?
@tigertang (1749)
• Singapore
15 Sep 07
Real News? Did you really expect the news to provide you with anything serious? Seriously, news mediums throughout the world have gone through such a major dumbing down its not even funny any more - but then again, it probably says alot of the public, the fact that Britany and Mini-Skirts make better headlines than the facts that the Federal Government has not exactly been honest.
I think its especially true when it comes to reporting on the Middle East. Best papers to read are the Israeli papers, which offer scope for debate and provide opinions unencumbered by the need to be politically correct. Read the Jerusalem Post and Heratz
2 people like this
@visitorinvasion (7709)
• United States
15 Sep 07
No, I certainly don't expect it from American news.
That's laughable, but it would be nice.
Thanks for the heads up about where I can find some truthful media.
@xParanoiax (6987)
• United States
15 Oct 07
I know! It's rather funny actually.
The guy the media blames everything on...never even charged.
If there was so much evidence that he did it, that he was such a scary villain who hurt us that day...then he would've been charged.
Plus...on the tapes that were released which were supposedly from him? He never claims that he blew up the towers. I think he might've said he wished he had, once...but wishing isn't the same thing as doing.
1 person likes this
@visitorinvasion (7709)
• United States
16 Oct 07
In one particular video, it isn't even him.
The guy is too dark, too fat, has to wide of a nose, is right-handed and is wearing RINGS. Muslims don't wear jewelry last time I checked.
I just wonder how a guy on dialysis has managed to live another 6 years...in a cave no less. Imagine that.
@xParanoiax (6987)
• United States
16 Oct 07
I looked into that. You're right. And that outfit he was wearing? It was pointed out that if he was hiding, that gaudy outfit (which he HAS been seen wearing it once)...how could he transport that if he's been hiding for so long? In the MOUNTAINS! Keep it clean...et cetera?
And you're right. That guy also seems to be a bit too young if he was really Osama, anyway. And he dyed his beard.
It's seen as vanity and therefore wrong to dye your beard black once you've gotten wrinkles..and Osama's been past that point for a long time.
Osama wouldn't dye his beard, because of his culture.
Yet the guy on the most recent tape did.
So..yeah.
1 person likes this
@MrNiceGuy (4139)
• United States
21 Sep 07
How WOULD he be charged? What courts would try him? International law, particularly when a non-sovereign entity is involved are sketchy. If you insinuate he didn't do it, read these:
http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2004/10/29/binladen_message041029.html
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,137095,00.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5325590.stm
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2001/11/11/wbin11.xml
http://www.fas.org/irp/news/2001/11/ukreport.html
http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/bin-laden-admits-responsibility-for-9.html
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6363306/
@visitorinvasion (7709)
• United States
22 Sep 07
Don't start this sh|t again.
Again, take your blogspot and shove it.
I don't care what you think, little boy.
Not 4 months ago, not today, not ever.
Don't assume you know my mind. I find it odd that anyone else on the planet would have been charged with UN violations out the azz, and your precious Bush has said with his own mouth that he isn't worried about Ossama so bite me troll. I haven't forgotten you or your faceless, spineless little boy crap.
@DavidReedy (2378)
• United States
16 Sep 07
I'm willing to bet the farm (as if I had one) that mainstream media barely touches this. MSNBC may touch this, only because they pander to the liberal view and will do what they can to assassinate Bush. (I have no problems with that--only knowing that all mainstream media has its corporate agenda.)
1 person likes this
@visitorinvasion (7709)
• United States
16 Sep 07
At one point in time I had documentation that Bush had used 1.65 billion of the taxpayers money to pay off Rupert Murdoch to broadcast/print what he was paid for, not the truth. Unfortunately, I wasn't smart enough to back up my bookmarks and lost them in a very rare firefox browser crash. If I am able to relocate it, I'll gladly share it.
@visitorinvasion (7709)
• United States
16 Sep 07
Oh, you may want to check out the Israeli news sources left by the man directly above my last response above. I have found some very interesting things, but I really haven't had time to check it out thoroughly as of yet.
