Arabian and American "conflicts"
By Falidtrapp
@Falidtrapp (40)
Chile
September 20, 2007 11:26pm CST
Hi, my grandfather was from Lebanon, he came to Chile when he was a child, talking to my grandmother, that came from there too, I start to know a little bit more of my culture, so I wanna make these discussion to know your opinion about the "war" (to me isn't a war, because Arabian people doesn't have any guns, except stones...)
My personal opinion is that all is for the oil, and the lover for the money of Bush.
I will love to read your opinions.
Please respect every one.
Greetings
1 response
@MrNiceGuy (4141)
• United States
24 Sep 07
1- The War isn't in Arabia, its in Iraq
2- Both Iraq and Arabia had armies with tanks, planes, etc.
3- Bush doesn't make money on war, the US is losing money in this war.
Next time come prepared for class
@Falidtrapp (40)
• Chile
24 Sep 07
Hi, you didn't understand me, I wasn't talk about ARABIA, I said ARABIAN (like Amercians, Arabians). You can't compare "armies, tanks, planes" of Irak, with the ones that "America" has. I wasn't talking about money for the people of america or either for the country, I was talking for mr. Bush, his family and the ones who control the oil, ok? I know that Us is losing money. You can compare the army of Palestine whit the army of U.S
Greetings
I'm waiting your answer
@MrNiceGuy (4141)
• United States
24 Sep 07
Again, America isn't fighting Arabians either, Bush's family nor Bush himself control oil. You said stones, they don't just have stones. Besides, a terrorist group like Al Queda can take out the Pentagon and the WTC without owning weapons....
@Falidtrapp (40)
• Chile
30 Sep 07
I read a book that says that all the attacks to the WTC where prepared by U.S. As an evidence the book says that all the companies that where in the WTC at lease one week ago of the 11, sold all of the stocks of his companies. Strange isn't it?
