Boomer No. 1 files for Social Security benefits

@tess1960 (2385)
United States
October 18, 2007 10:14am CST
I seen the following article yesterday on boomergirl.com and realized I am in the babyboomer category. I never really thought much about it untill my hubby turned 50. Now we wonder if we have enough in Savings and enough Life Insurance. Should we have more taken from paychecks to put in KPERS's? It's a scarey thought that there will be nothing left if they don't do something about it soon. The article: Boomer No. 1 files for Social Security benefits By Stephen Ohlemacher - The Associated Press Oct. 17, 2007 WASHINGTON — The baby boomers' stampede for Social Security benefits has begun. The nation's "first" baby boomer, a retired teacher from New Jersey, applied for Social Security benefits Monday, signaling the start of an expected avalanche of applications from the post World War II generation. Social Security Commissioner Michael Astrue called it "America's silver tsunami." Kathleen Casey-Kirschling applied for benefits over the Internet at an event hosted by Astrue. Casey-Kirschling was born one second after midnight on Jan. 1, 1946, gaining her recognition as the first baby boomer — a generation of nearly 80 million born from 1946 to 1964, Astrue said. "She's leading the way for her generation," Astrue told reporters. Casey-Kirschling will be eligible for benefits after she turns 62 next year. She said she taught seventh graders for 14 years at a school near Camden, N.J., before retiring and volunteering for the Red Cross in Gulf Coast areas hit by Hurricane Katrina. Kathleen Casey-Kirschling, the nation's first baby boomer, files for her Social Security retirement benefits over the Internet at the National Press Club in Washington on Monday. Casey-Kirschling, a retired teacher and resident of Maryland, was born on January 1, 1946, at 12:00:01 a.m. With her 62nd birthday right around the corner, she applied for her benefits using the online application at www.socialsecurity.gov to become the first boomer in the United States to receive Social Security retirement benefits. (AP Photo) She and her husband have since moved to the eastern shore of Maryland near the Chesapeake Bay. "I think I'm just lucky to be at the top of the boom," she said. An estimated 10,000 people a day will become eligible for Social Security benefits over the next two decades, Astrue said. The Social Security trust fund, if left alone, is projected to go broke in 2041. But Astrue said he is optimistic that Congress will address the issue, perhaps after the 2008 presidential election. President Bush had proposed changes in Social Security to create private accounts, but the proposal went nowhere in Congress. Last week, Bush's budget director called the growth in Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid a "fiscal train wreck." The three entitlement programs make up nearly half of all federal spending, a share that is expected to grow. A report issued last month by the Treasury Department said that some combination of benefit cuts and tax increases will need to be considered to permanently fix the Social Security shortfall. But White House officials stressed that Bush remains opposed to raising taxes. Astrue acknowledged the political difficulties of addressing the issue, but said there is still time. "There's no totally politically easy choice," Astrue said. "I'm not pushing any one answer." Casey-Kirschling said her generation won't let Social Security fail. "I think the baby boomers will want to get this fixed," she said. "They're going to want to take care of their children and their grandchildren."
2 people like this
3 responses
@fizzytom (752)
• Maribor, Slovenia
19 Oct 07
I am in my thirties, my partner is 40 and we are really good savers as well as having pensions that we pay into. We just bought a second home abroad this week which is good for holidays but we also see it as an investment. I do think that the pressure to buy on credit has made people less likely to save and the changes that have seen it the norm rather than a privilege to own your home have been instrumental in seeing a generation develop that will now have to claim benefits. Also, while health care is supposed to be improving, it's also having the effect of keeping people alive who don't have the money to live - does that make sense? What I mean is, in the past people would have been able to live their last years on what they had saved because the money didn't have to stretch out for too many years - now we live for longer with less money.
1 person likes this
@suspenseful (40192)
• Canada
19 Oct 07
I am past the Baby Boomer stage and my husband, the Babyboomer, took early retirement, but we are Canadians and here we are in worse trouble. You see, unlike the States, people here started to limit their children to two except for a few from very religious backgrounds and immigrants. So in a few years, there will be so many old people, more than the young people who will be working to support them. Myself, we adopted two, but were told by the adoption agency that we could not adopt any more. So even the adoption agencies there were getting into the two or less babies per couple. Not only that, many prefer to have only one and some none. And there is also no laws forbidding abortion here. I read that part about Bush wanting to set up private accounts in Social Security and since the Congress is mostly Democrats they voted against it, so that they can get the Democrats in and once the President is a Democrat, then they will vote the private account in. Oh and you saving money was a good idea. I was able to put some away even though I worked at low paying jobs, and my husband invested in stocks, and with his pension, we will have enough to afford to travel at least once a year.
@tess1960 (2385)
• United States
19 Oct 07
Good for you two, saving and all. I am glad you saw to the future to save. I have a daughter that is 31 and her family lives payday to payday. They have 1 child and it breaks my heart to know they are not saving for a rainy day or for her college. My granddaughter is not learning to save from them either. It can be sad and frustrating. My daughter rarely worked but now she is working as my granddaughter is school age. I know I won't get much help from them in my old age so muct plan for it myself. I did not know that Canada was restricting how many ids to have. That is sad, hopefully there are not a lot of kids in orphanages or foster care, needed homes when they are denying willing people adoptions.
19 Oct 07
I have a small amount socked away in an investment account and will have to rely on the UK state pension I guess.
1 person likes this