She Kills Her Kid, but gets 3 Years Jail AND Alimony!?

@theprogamer (10534)
United States
December 1, 2007 2:40am CST
I was reminded to do this discussion from another member here. This case threw me for a loop and plenty of other people too. Its sad what happened and the aftermath is disgusting. http://www.northjersey.com/page.php?qstr=eXJpcnk3ZjczN2Y3dnFlZUVFeXkzJmZnYmVsN2Y3dnFlZUVFeXk3MjI0NzQzJnlyaXJ5N2Y3MTdmN3ZxZWVFRXl5Mg== Ech... CNN's report can be found here http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2007/11/25/acosta.child.alimony.cnn And here is the report and review of the courts (as a PDF) http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/opinions/a5053-05.pdf First the reduction of charge is misleading. Apparently the medical error was a result of the beating in the first place (damage due to the beating severed particular arteries in the shoulder and neck). Also, this mother was a drunk, violent and abusive. Alcohol IS NOT an excuse for a crime, especially as a guy. So why for supposed justice is it used as an excuse for her. It's pretty warped. This is also gone into depth by some of the reactions and comments I posted below. The main idea, a child was murdered and the mother is getting away with a comparable slap on the wrist. Plus bonus -_-. I can't get around this, maybe someone else can point something out I may have missed or if I'm not seeing it right. Personally, I think this a sick situation. Reactions here, some of the comments really bring it to light http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=1461#comments http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/11/30/alimony-to-the-murderous-mom-and-child-support-to-the-female-rapist-franz-kafka-real-life-has-outdone-ya/
4 people like this
5 responses
@3lilangels (4639)
• United States
1 Dec 07
i can't believe this myself i don't have much words for this but i think this is sick and digusting.this women deserves to be no longer living.it's horrible how people can get away with this kind of stuff.thats whats wrong with our systems now adays,they let people get away with crimes where they should go farther than that.if i had any say this women wouldn't be living! pattie
3 people like this
• United States
1 Dec 07
Warped is one way of saying that our judicial system sucks big time. We are still reeling here in Georgia from the news yesterday about a mother murdering her two children in a public toilet. We have people committing the most horrendous crimes and getting a slap on the wrist. Especially if you are a celebrity, OJ comes to mind or an illegal then you do not have to worry about anything you do not get deported just a free ride on the tax payer's dollar. Sorry for ranting but the whole government, regardless of what branch just pisses me off. Makes me sometimes wonder if vigilantes dont have the right idea.
2 people like this
@theprogamer (10534)
• United States
1 Dec 07
I'm also figuring it all out too. I keep warning that some people get off of their crimes much easier. Its not just the celebs too. Its now certain groups of people, or specific pre-requirements that are used to excuse crimes. This crime and how its been handled is pretty disturbing. Then there is the case about the ex, the surviving child and other legal muck ups going on. Its just hard to describe and believe what's going on here.
4 people like this
@theprogamer (10534)
• United States
1 Dec 07
I did see that news report as well Heather, not just the story but mylot discussions on it. Sad story and very disturbing.
3 people like this
@theprogamer (10534)
• United States
6 Dec 07
I know Mooch... I know. But even that still doesn't take away from how sick the situations are. Plus there are lawyers and judges circumventing the law, legal agreements, licenses. I've seen cases of it, its very terrible.
2 people like this
@ladyluna (7004)
• United States
3 Dec 07
Hey there Gamer, Before I provide my response, I would like to offer up that perhaps 'prison justice' will resolve this issue. Any parent who could kill their own flesh & blood can, in no way, be called a Human Being. Heck, most animals will not even kill their own. OK, now you're not going to like what I'm about to say. Yet, it needs to be said. So, here goes: A judge's role is not to create the law. It's to interpret and apply it. Now, from what I've read, the law is very clear in N.J. It may be woefully whacked, yet it is clear. Rather than continuing to fight this in the courts, the Father should be fighting it in the state legislature. Furthermore, it would seem a logical conclusion that the father now has custody of any other marital children? If so, then he should be fighting this on the grounds that there has been a change of circumstances, which would thereby nullify the alimony order. I'll also point out that the father had gotten into arrears (to the tune of 40k) by the time of the writing of the article. How much of that alimony was due before the crime was committed? As awful as this all is, it should not be used to excuse the father from his lawful responsibility, prior to the unthinkable act. If I were the father, I would sue the mother in civil court, for actual and implied damages resulting from the crime. I would construe a damages sought amount in excess of any alimony owed, for arrears, and future pain & suffering. He'll never see the money, but a win in the court will counter any monies owed to the mother. On a separate matter, I would concurrently file suit against the N.J. municipality responsible for any errors resulting in the charges being downgraded from Murder 1 to manslaughter. And, I would publicize the suit to the fullest extent possible. Send notice to all the 'talking heads'. The greater the media pressure on the NJ municipality, and state legislature to change the laws to reflect a forfeiture of any spousal support if the deliberate infliction of injury causes fatality. This is such a common sense issue, yet has probably escaped inclusion in the NJ Family Law codes, because of obscurity. How often do we hear about infanticide by either a mother or father? Not very often. Sadly, the commentary that says that the judiciary was correct to rule, and bump responsibility over to the legislature, is right. Judges cannot make the law. Only legislators can. To allow the judges in this case to write law creates that slippery slope of activist judges. Then where does it stop??????
@ladyluna (7004)
• United States
11 Jun 08
Hello Harley, To my way of thinking, someone who has committed infanticide is neither Christian nor Muslim. A person capable of committing such a heinous action holds no spiritual connection The Creator. Such a vicious killer is not even as enlightened as most beasts of burden. Your bait holds no lure, because the bait lacks credibility!
@Harley009 (1416)
• India
16 Dec 07
ladyluna, Just only to you :) If this was done by a Muslim, what will be the case ? Will bash Islam and Muslims, isn't ? Do these news specify 'Christian' or any other ? Just have a look :) No arguments. :)
@ladyluna (7004)
• United States
11 Jun 08
Sorry I missed that response from Harley. Seven months later, who really wants to dredge something this horrible back up, eh? Anyway, thanks for the BR, Progamer!!!
@williamjisir (22819)
• China
1 Dec 07
Hello dear theprogramer. I am just wondering how come the sentence is so light on her side since she killed her own daughter for just three years jail and alimony. It is hard to believe that she should be given such a treatment. What is wrong with the justice? It is hard to understand though. Thanks for your discussion.
2 people like this
@theprogamer (10534)
• United States
1 Dec 07
Well justice is getting lopsided stateside William. But this one just blew me away. I thought other previous cases were bad, this one just tops everything else. I know its hard to believe she got a light sentence; also notice in the police report and the news reports there was some excusing being done, especially at the end. That too should be something to elicit reaction in concerned citizens.
3 people like this
@sher16 (39)
• Philippines
2 Dec 07
There you go. Who says life is ever fair?