Golden Compass - Does it glorify negative behavior in children? Lying, selfish.
By ladyluna
@ladyluna (7004)
United States
December 4, 2007 7:52am CST
Good morning All,
Aside from the atheistic & agnostic beliefs which have allegedly been heavily watered down, it would seem that this film "The Golden Compass" glorifies the negative behaviors of: lying, selfishness, attempted matricide, lawbreaking, stubborness, etc... Values very much at odds with those that most of us strive to instill in our children.
Linked here is a troubling exposé of the movies main character, Lyra. This early glimpse into the heroine's terribly flawed personality certainly raises some valid questions about the author's perceptions of what constitutes herioc behaviors.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59016
There has been a lot of hype about the movie, most focusing on the atheistic & agnostic beliefs of the author, Philip Pullman. Pullman allegedly has some rather strong views on how to convert children to atheism. Below are a few quotes attributed to him:
"… if there is a God, and he is as the Christians describe him, then he deserves to be put down and rebelled against."
"I wanted to reach everyone," he says, "and the best way I could hope to do that was to write for children."
"My books are about killing God."
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58987
The first exposé concludes with this strong warning:
"Our suggestion is avoid "The Golden Compass" if you don't want to turn your children into spoiled brats who want to kill their parents like Lyra."
So, my questions are:
1. Have you read Pullman's Trilogy?
2. Is the main character as psychologically flawed as this reviewer finds her?
3. Should we be exposing our children to such heroes, if emulating them teaches such negative behaviors?
4. Are you planning on taking the kiddies to see it? Or see it yourself?
Thanks, I look forward to your input!
1 person likes this
6 responses
@UnselfishShellfish (1306)
• United States
4 Dec 07
A lot of different things can influence a child's behavior. I've heard horror stories of kids watching Hannah Montana and then being bitc*y little divas because Hannah gets what she wants because she's Hannah.
Anything can influence a child to do negative things or something bad to get something their idol has.
I have not read the books, nor do I plan on it. But it's just a movie. If you think your kids aren't mature enough to handle the message and not act out like they do in the movie, then don't take them to see it.
My sister doesn't let her 3 year old watch adult shows or adult movies. Simple as that.
1 person likes this
@UnselfishShellfish (1306)
• United States
4 Dec 07
And plenty of parents have children who grow up spoiled and selfish and I bet they never saw this movie.
1 person likes this
@ladyluna (7004)
• United States
4 Dec 07
Hello UnselfishShellfish,
"My sister doesn't let her 3 year old watch adult shows or adult movies. Simple as that"
Well, I certainly can't argue with that.
Yet, I suspect the reason why the reviewer has provided this expose of the main character's personality flaws, before even releasing the full review, is to inform parents about what they can expect from this movie.
I also supsect the much of the early concerns about this movie have to do with the enormous marketing campaign designed to 'hook' kids into the other two books in the trilogy.
Thanks for sharing. You're right that many factors affect childhood behavior. This just happens to be one that parents might just have a say about.
1 person likes this
@drannhh (15219)
• United States
6 Dec 07
I haven't seen the movie, but I've spent more than enough time researching the hoopla about it. Really, I can't say which is scarier, the author's agenda or this woman's response:
http://acupofteawithanne.blogspot.com/2007/12/more-warnings-on-golden-compass.html
Needless to say, I went right over to the movie site and took their 20 question quiz, which took forever to load even on my reasonably fast computer. But it was amazing. After I gave my information, the daemon it chose for me was an exact match for my husband and when I put his information, it came up with an exact match for me!
I suppose that could be frightening to the weak-minded, but to me this only proves that skillful "interviewers" can get a lot out of a person in just 20 questions. No, I don't think well-raised children can be corrupted by this sort of thing. If they have learned any values at home, seeing this sort of thing is something like looking in a magic mirror. If what they see is like themselves, it is like a regular mirror, if what they see is different, they view it like the distorted image in a fun house mirror. It will be repugnant to them and they will grow nothing but stronger in the goodness they already have.
1 person likes this
@ladyluna (7004)
• United States
7 Dec 07
Hello Drannhh,
Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this. I always welcome your perspective.
I read Ellie's call to action, and although I'll readily admit that reactions like hers are more likely to drive folks to the theaters (and the official website), I must also acknowledge that her fears are not completely unfounded.
Although, many probably don't like to hear it, we have far too many 'latch-key' kids in this country. Britney, Paris, Snoop Dog, and Kevin Federline have much too much influence over the children in the age group that this movie is being marketed to.
There is a war being waged against ethics and values in this country: The "Boy Scouts", N.A.M.B.L.A., the legal battles over any reference to God, the war against Christmas displays, etc... So, although I agree that Ellie's reaction will ultimately be counterproductive, I must acknowledge that she's not a complete nut-job.
Target-Marketing is a powerful tool. Your findings from completing the survey will likely produce wildly different reactions from that of 10yr. olds. They'll find that their persoal daemon (or demon) being the same demon as their 'bestest friend' will cementing like epoxy. They'll be captivated that they share a secret between themselves. No parental involvement, just an insideous secret awareness of a perceived lurking force, real or perceived. Most alarming is that those kiddies will know that demons are attributable to the netherworld. Geesh, every child psychologist is likely shaking this reality off, or gleefully looking forward to future clients.
Given the recent psycho-medical findings that humans do not fully develop their sense of judgement until approximately the age of 25, I'll repeat my consistent response throughout this thread: Before parents drop the kiddies off at the mall to see this flick, they should screen it themselves. Then, and only then can they determine if it is harmonious with the values they are teaching their children.
About your mirror analogy: Although I agree in principle, I have worked with a number of 'at risk' children. This type of lure is a perfect temptation for them. Most do not have strong family structure or values, many have one or more parents in the penal system, and they are terribly confused about good and evil. It rather sounds to me like Pullman is quite apprised of both target marketing, and demographics. So, I think that offering a gentle reminder to parents that they should pre-screen this movie can only be helpful.
@xParanoiax (6987)
• United States
5 Dec 07
I thought Lyra was an orphan who lived with her uncle? (Nevermind you those confusing true families lines, she was lied to, as I understand it).
I glanced through the books when I first got them, unfortunately I never got to truly read them because of our last housefire.
Have -you- read the books?
From some very smart friends of mine, who have, loved the books.
Does a hero HAVE to be perfect?
A person with mental illness can be a hero in reality...so flawed or not, I don't see why she couldn't be a hero herself.
I don't care that the author was an athiest. From the bits I've heard, read, and seen from clips...I see only a mixture of many religions, not an exclusion of them.
If he aimed to kill God...well. Whatever. His idea of God, he's allowed to kill...everyone else has a different view.
I'm not christian, nor easily offended. I do however like a good story, how the author intended it to be recieved is interesting but irrelevant to me.
Facts are; mortals do not kill Gods.
In fiction they can, but fiction is eternal, which in sense, allows that deity to keep living through the tale.
Which remains; you can't kill a God.
Ideas are eternal, they fade over time..but they return eventually. They just..never truly die.
If his intention was to help his idea of God fade...well all the power to him.
You're allowed to do anything in fiction. I should know, I've published a book, lol.
Children should be exposed to as much of the world as possible, but it's the parents duty to guide and teach them and keep them safe.
There is nothing dangerous in fiction.
Not unless you've not done your job as a parent. I turned out fine, right? I was raised on horror movies and I read a five hundred page fantasy book by time I was ten (not to mention dozens others in non-fiction).
And my family's pretty screwed up, heh, but my parents always spoke to me about the stories before or after I was finished with them.
We'd often disagree, but such discussions help create a healthy foundation for young minds.
Technically, I am still a child by law. I'm in my later teens now. But I am planning to see it, as is my mother.
We love stories. We'll judge how awful it is for ourselves and ignore everyone else who says its awful until then.
Remember; christian groups were the same folks who said Harry Potter books and movies, Narnia, and Lord of the Rings were evil, awful stories, promoting horrible things.
As far as I've seen, they were incorrect.
Besides...getting worked up over a story, which can only do what you allow it to do, is silly.

@ladyluna (7004)
• United States
5 Dec 07
Hello xParanoiax,
You mentioned that you're in your teens, is that correct? Just an f.y.i. -- your member profile indicates that you are 7yrs old. Not sure if you knew that, so I thought I'd let you know of the error.
Anyway, you raise alot of very interesting points here.
I did wish to make one clarification: Christian groups did NOT take issue with C.S. Lewis' works. Lewis has long been an author known to pen in synch with traditional Christian values. Furthermore, I have no knowledge on any issue taken with Tolkein's works. There may have been. Yet, I am unaware. If anyone is the wiser on this point, I welcome any input.
I will respectfully take issue with your supposition: children's need for positive role models as a load of crap. As children age, they naturally broaden their sphere of influence. Hence, the absolute need for positive role models, other than their parents and immediate family. Why do you suppose parents have spent billions and billions, of dollars supporting the role model industry? "Babe Ruth" trading cards, "Air Jordan" court shoes, "G.I. Joe" action figures, "Barbie" and "Lara Croft" dolls, etc... We don't buy these things just to placate our children. We do so to help fortify the values that we consciously (or sadly sometimes unconsciously) instill on our children. If you'd like a fictionalized, intriguing perception of what happens to children who are void of positive, adult role models I suggest you read "The Lord of the Flies".
Please remember that children learn from positive and negative influence. Yet, they need guidance to be able to discern between the two. Sometimes learning what is wrong is a much more powerful lesson than learning what is right. Yet, without parents, family, school, community, authors, etc... paying attention to the kinds of lessons we/they are imparting on our youth, we risk having to undo layers of negative training. Ask any Behavioral Psychologist -- it's much harder to undo what has been learned than to teach it in the first place.
Thank you for sharing your perceptions here. You've provided much food for thought.
@xParanoiax (6987)
• United States
5 Dec 07
P.s. I always thought the whole "Kids need role models" thing was a load of crap.
You can admire people or characters, but basing yourself after one?
Does that inspire creativity and original individuality? I think not.
I never had one.
I did admire a great many people and characters though.
It's just...a common thread I've seen and been baffled by.
Why do kids have to base themselves after others? Mimicking I understand. It's natural for younglings to copy the behavior of older folks, but to base their own personality off of? No. That's not the same thing, NOR healthy or good.
Mimicking is natural and healthy because usually the adults or older folks tend to teach the children right and wrong and guide them through thinking for themselves...

@Neriz69 (1091)
• Philippines
5 Dec 07
I'm a mother of 4 kids and I know your sentiments. The sad truth about it is we really cannot protect our children enough. So I think the best thing to do is to build a strong foundation of love based on Christian faith. Let us teach them what is good and help distinguish the bad.
There is a saying that "Parents knows best for their children". I believe this is no longer enough. I believe it's time to teach them and let them know what is best for them and let them experience it themselves.
I believe this is the best solution for them to have the solid foundation of what is good for them. There are a lot of negative forces out there and more to come. They come in different forms, toys, gadgets, movies, books, etc. Let us equip them with a solid christian faith as we won't be around to protect them forever.
God bless.
@ladyluna (7004)
• United States
5 Dec 07
Hello Neriz69,
I agree. We cannot protect them forever. Part of our job, as parents/grandparents, is to instill values and ethics on to our children, so that they are equipped to make healthy choices in the face of negativity.
However, none can argue that children of the age that are being targeted for this movie, are not thusly equipped.
I agree with the spirit of the reviewer -- parents should screen this movie before their children see it. Then, they can decide whether it is in harmony with their own values & ethics. Hence, the reason why I began this post; to give parents a 'heads up' that this movie should not to be confused with other innocuous childrens stories.
Thanks for sharing. You make some fine points!
@drannhh (15219)
• United States
7 Dec 07
Just to clarify, I don't think Ellie is a nut-job at all. I wish I could say the same for C.S. Lewis...just kidding! OK, I couldn't help that. No, I don't care much for C.S. Lewis, but I don't consider him a nut-job either. Ellie is probably an excellent parent, by the way. I was stricken by your comment about parents dropping their children off at the mall to see movies, and think you might get a kick out of knowing that when I was a kid we only viewed movies as a family. We shopped as a family, too, and used to drive by the theater where long lines of children were waiting to get into the Matinee as it was called back when this extravangaza cost all of 15 cents. "Look at all those rich kids!" I'd say, pointing out the window. "They're not rich," my mum would answer, "Their family is just paying to get rid of them for a while." You can form your own conclusion from that one, lol.
In the Middle Ages, it was common to perceive the human body and soul as two separate entities and to have the two conversing more or less as Homer Simpson does in the comics when he has the "angel" sitting on one shoulder and the "devil" sitting on the other, with both egging him on in opposition directions. The early church used it as a teaching tool. I don't see any harm in it at all. It is important for people to understand that the "daemons" of Greek antiquity could be good or bad and the word has no relationship whatsoever to our word "demon." When I taught in a Catholic elementary school, though, we weren't allowed to expose the children to Greek thought, and as much as I loved the school and the nuns and the children, I always secretly hoped that at least one of them would grow up to become a famous Greek scholar.
I don't see this sort of book or movie as a temptation for at-risk children, but rather as a pitifully poor substitute for parental guidance. I, too, find some of what Pullman says offensive. But the movie is intended to 1) make money, and 2) entertain. Nowhere it is designed to be "in loco parentis" so if the under-25's get in there and it messes up their minds, I wouldn't blame it on any movie show. In my experience, at-risk children are extremely needy, and it is this reaching out for assurance, self-esteem, and substitutes for love that get them in trouble. Sadly.
1 person likes this
@xXxMikesWifeyxXx (3072)
• United States
4 Dec 07
there are so many things these days that can misgude your chilren,and unless you observe and watch what they watch or read, its possible for them to get ahold of stuff like this.. me just by readin this post. i want nothing to do with the book the movie nothing the author has to offer, im not tryn to say hes wrong but its aginst what i believe and what i have taught my daughter...this guys work would not be welcomed in my house.
1 person likes this
@ladyluna (7004)
• United States
5 Dec 07
Hello MikesWifey,
You're so right. There are many things that can lead our children down misguided paths these days.
What's worse is, as pointed out above: How many parents really take the time to screen what their children are reading and watching? Parents already have so much on their plates these days. Wouldn't it be comforting to be able to trust children's authors to not cross the line?
Like you, I find no great need to test the waters with Pullman's works. His discomfort with C.S. Lewis speaks volumes for me.
Thanks so much for sharing your views.






