HGH vs Steroids.

United States
December 18, 2007 5:47pm CST
Does it matter to you if a player used HGH or steroids? If a player admits he used HGH do you think it is better than admitting to steroids?Me, I don't care either way.How about you?
1 response
@jam14zen (149)
• United States
19 Dec 07
I believe if the player used anything in the last 10 or 15 years then it is "water under the bridge" unfortunately. At this point the whole league has been tainted so badly people are going to refer to this as the steroid era. That is not good. There is a lot of gray area on this topic. The experts of testing are trying to keep up with the experts who create stuff to get by the tests. So, if you have a ton of $ like B. Bonds or R. Clemons you might be able to find some state of the art "cream" that your average ballplayer either couldn't afford or simply wouldn't be invited into such a prestigious situation. Makes all the clean players out there look that much better, too bad we can't tell who they are %100 of the time. I feel any player out to get an unfair advantage in a game where people are paid millions of $'s is a big deal. Many times a cheater is making the $ that some clean guy working his butt off in triple or double A should get a shot at making and at the same time restoring integrity, principles and values to the great game of baseball.