Should the Press Continue the "Hands Off" Policy with Chelsea Clinton?

I agree. Though I think the original "hands off" policy related more to paparazzi style stalking and harassment; which I don't condone being targeted at anyone, regardless of age. But she should be treated like anyone else with regards challenging questions and arguing her case, particularly if she is campaigning. I expect she wouldn't want it any other way.

What I want to know is why is Chelsea any different than the Bushes daughters. If they step out of line the media ould be on them like ugly on an ape. Everything that she does should be scrutenized as any other adult chid would be. What's Hillary going to do put the reportes in jail?

I must have missed it when Hillary made it clear the "hands off" policy is still in effect. Has Chelsea done something wrong that should be "challenged" by the press? She's been campaigning for her mother, kind of like Mitt Romney's son's have been campaigning for their father and I see nothing wrong or unusual about that in either case. And no matter what your opinion about either of her parents may be, am I to assume you feel the media should be harrassing and hounding Chelsea to trash her parents publicly now that she's an adult? I think it just may be that Chelsea loves her parents just as the Bush twins love their parents and it might not have everything to do with politics! I know that's a kind of radical idea but I thought I'd throw it out there anyway...lol! Annie

I think its hands off because Chelsea probably knows all the deep dark secrets of Billary. She could probably destroy Billary's career with one simple interview. It would be great if Chelsea were to write a book later down the road. I'm sure that it would be immensely popular.