What is the difference between a right and a privilege?

United States
January 5, 2008 6:02am CST
OK, here I go again, openning up a messy can of worms. Every since a certain post a few days ago concerning topless women, I've been thinking about the difference between a right and a privilege. There's a blurry line between the two, but I think we can make a distinction. Life -- that's a no brainer. It's a right. Driving -- privilege. You have to prove you are fit to drive by taking a test. Owning a cell phone -- privilege. Believe it or not, a person would not die if he/she did not use a cell phone. Reproduction -- right. We are built to reproduce, it comes naturally. shelter -- here's were the line starts to get blurry. A person has the right to shelter, but what if the person doesn't want to do what it takes to provide shelter for himself? Now a days, a person can go to the government and say, "hey! I'm not willing to work, therefore, I'm not able to provide shelter for myself, therefore, you (the government/tax payers) must provide me with shelter." I say shelter is a privilege, therefore you need to work for it. food -- see shelter voting -- privilege. A person can't vote until she reaches a certain age. People convicted of felonies are not permitted to vote. What else can you think of that is a right vs. a privilege? What else could be considered a right AND privilege?
1 person likes this
2 responses
@roberten (3128)
• United States
5 Jan 08
You have a right to you own opinion, everyone has one, but it is a priviledge to express it publicly as some are forbidden to do in certain situations.
1 person likes this
@roberten (3128)
• United States
8 Jan 08
U.S. citizens do retain the right to free speech but even that right has limits and carry concequences. There is no substitute for good judgment.
• United States
5 Jan 08
I'm not saying this to be rude or funny, but in the United States our Constitution specifies that we have a RIGHT to freedom of speech. We are not forbiden to express our opinions in public regardless of the situation. So, expressing opinions is a right not a privilege. Let me know if I've misunderstood what you were trying to say. Regards.
1 person likes this
• United States
5 Jan 08
I'm not saying this to be rude or funny, but in the United States our Constitution specifies that we have a RIGHT to freedom of speech. We are not forbiden to express our opinions in public regardless of the situation. So, expressing opinions is a right not a privilege. Let me know if I've misunderstood what you were trying to say. Regards.
1 person likes this
• Halifax, Nova Scotia
5 Jan 08
i think the biggest privilege you forgot to mention is the internet.. i agree everyone has a right to state their views but people definately abuse the internet and especially in places like IRC etc ive met plenty of people who shouldnt even be allowed touching a keyboard let alone going on the internet.. theres worse things you can do online than state opinions also.. teaching people stuff that some people shouldnt be taught.. crimes on the internet such as fraud and indentity theft.. hackers and such.. people who like to do DoS attacks as you may all remember when large web sites like amazon.com went down due to a denial of service attack.. so ya the internet i say is a privilege not a right
• United States
5 Jan 08
I did forget the internet -- privilege. Here is another blurry line. Since the internet is a privilege, I believe that people should fend for themselves. Each user should be responsible for protecting their computer from virusses. The government should not get involved with passing laws concerning internet usage. If a person doesn't want a virus, then that person should learn how to protect his computer from viruses. Another good point you bring up is freedom of speech. Does a person have the right to be what you consider to be abusive? You say he shouldn't be allowed to touch a keyboard, but he says he's just exercising his right to freedom of speech. It's such a complicated issue it boggles the mind. Thanks for your thought provoking response.
1 person likes this
• Halifax, Nova Scotia
5 Jan 08
perhaps i should have been more clear.. id never say someone shouldnt touch a keyboard for something they state on the internet.. i was more speaking of the criminals who do the fruds and identity thefts and such.. its similar to a theif in a store.. you get caught and they ban you from the store.. if youre gonna steal someones identify or credit cards or personal info or whatever you too should be banned from the 'store' so to speak..
• United States
5 Jan 08
Ok, I get it now. I have a special hatred for online criminals. Penalties for them should be stiffer than the penalties a guy would receive robbing a store because online crimes touch so many people's lives and ruin them. The store robber may get away with a couple hundred dollars but it ends there. The online criminal takes lives that take time to be put back together. Thanks for re-posting. I think I got it now. And I agree, the internet is a privilege. Although I would suffer greatly if I could no longer have it, I would survive. Cheers! '