Help For People with Special Needs is NOT a Right!

@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
January 9, 2008 11:52am CST
In another thread, a member here at MyLot brought up an argument that I decided deserves a thread of its own. How far should the government go in supporting people with special needs? To me, not very far. Yes, all public buildings and facilities should be designed to accomidate as many special needs as possible... but a line does need to be drawn somewhere. Private property on the other hand, should be left up to the owners. Even if that private property happens to be a business open to the public. Why? Because no one has the right to impose their needs on someone else. I'm disabled myself. My particular disability has something to do with the fact that I pass out once in awhile for no apparent reason. I have lived with a constant dizziness for 5 years now, sometimes it's barely noticeable, other times it's maddening. Should the government make sure that I'm safe everywhere I go? Should all floors be padded to make sure I don't get hurt if I happen to be there when the lights go out for me? Should all corridors be fitted with railings for me to use when I'm feeling dizzy? Should I be able to sue for discrimination if anyone and everyone doesn't alter their property to accomidate me? I knew a guy in who ran a diner in a farming town. His clientel was entirely made up for ranchers and farmers. In 10 years of business he's never even seen a person in a wheelchair. Some idiots from the state came by his diner for an "inspection". As a result of the "inspection" he was told that he was violating the law because he had no wheelchair ramps and his bathrooms weren't wheelchair friendly. It cost him over $10,000 to get his diner up to the state's idea of "fair". $10,000 sacrificed to the false gods of "fairness". Freedom goes both ways folks. Just as the disabled person has every right to be able to eat out, shop or conduct business with whoever they want... Business owners and communities have the rights too. I don't have any more right to impose my disabilities on you as you have the right to impose your idea of how to best take care of my needs on anyone.
6 people like this
9 responses
@Debs_place (10520)
• United States
9 Jan 08
Well I think accomodations should be made for the disabled but it has to be done with in reason -- Macy's and Sears should, the small Mom & Pop shops if the are to do it, should be given assistance if they are forced to make such a change.. what bothers me is I work with developmentally disabled adults. the government gives these adults everything including spending money and vacations. Yet, the parents make all the major decision. We have one guy who in the past 4 months has sent several people to the ER due to his violence. Last week he assaulted 3 people in the first hour and a half of the day. His mother will not allow us to give this man any medications to help control his violent episodes. She will not take him home even to visit for an afternoon because of his violent episodes. She is scared of him. Yet she feels that it is ok for us to be physically abused by him. Now as far as I am concerned some where someone went astray, the parents have no responsibility for their children yet they control them. We have had parents complain about haircuts, styles of sneakers and length of their pants. Where is the responsibility here.
3 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
9 Jan 08
That's just disgusting. Haven't they ever heard of "implied consent" or better yet, "standing orders". I stand corrected on the "pay others" thing. Apparently all they are willing to do is claim their rights as parents... but nothing else.
1 person likes this
@Debs_place (10520)
• United States
10 Jan 08
Well, these guys are all also moderately to severely retarded. One of them was raised by his Grandmother before as a teen he was placed. The rest have families within 50 or 60 miles, of the 4 guys only one has family that even visits him periodically - then they invade up to 8 people and 3 of the 8 were little children or infants. The rest don't even get gifts at Christmas or birthday. I can understand them placing them in a home, it is a full time job, they get up during the night, theywet the bed, they punch themselves, people and objects. These are men, are approaching their 40s. Their families just don't have the resources needed to deal with them but I am amazed how they can place their kids in a home, but retain control and not even bother to visit them or see how they are doing.
1 person likes this
• Italy
9 Jan 08
Well Parated I think the inspectors were right: if he hasn't got a weelchair ramp he should get one. With your reasoning then no one would put a weelchair ramp (too expensive) and people with weelchair couldn't go anywhere. If we can do something to help disabled people then we should do it, unfortunately not all the problems are easy to help (like your problem) Maybe the better thing would be a contribute from the state to put ramps and other facilities for disabled persons.
2 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
9 Jan 08
If the state is going to impose such standards on us, then it is up to them to pay for it... not the property owners. If want businesses to accomidate the disabled, we should be doing fund raisers to help them do it, not passing draconian laws requiring it.
2 people like this
@eden32 (3973)
• United States
9 Jan 08
No small business owner can afford to lose business if a new customer shows up in a wheelchair. Any retail owner is going to jump over backwards to find a way to get the person into their establishment even if they don't have a ramp. I'd imagine his friend's diner was a street level place, probably one step getting into it from the street, and one coming down inside of the building. There's no reason the owner or manager couldn't step outside, help the person in the chair boost up over the step & guide them down inside. If suddenly his friend had a regular customer in a chair, he could then weigh out if he could afford to get a ramp to make things easier on himself & his customer. If he had been in business all those years without a ramp, clearly he didn't need one.
2 people like this
@Modestah (11177)
• United States
10 Jan 08
you know what? I have a more common disability than dysfunctional legs - I have a dysfunctional bladder, and little kids too! and as you likely know little kids have to frequently empty their bladder. so..... where is the law protecting us from inconvenience and social embarrassment? how come there are still public establishments that have signs in their window - no public restrooms? why is it I can shop at a store and either a child or myself will need urgent relief and I am told sorry we do not have a restroom. you mean to tell me that the workers never have to go? or that the person behind the deli never washes up? puhlease. these places do not need expensive alterations, they already have the facility they just are not permitting john q public to use it. even the threat of a child whizzing on the floor is not enough to bend the selfish rule.
1 person likes this
@nuffsed (1271)
10 Jan 08
You describe your disability, but it is nothing like having to rely on a wheelchair just to move from A to B, interact with society and get about. Actually, I would advocate the government issuing you with protective clothing that will protect you from falls, but you would no doubt choose to not wear it. I believe in access to a basic level of care for all. There is little to be admired morally, in trying to defend the tradition of making buildings only suitable for the able bodied, especially on the basis of cost. Your diner owning friend can look at it another way if he chooses. For ten years or so he has not had to spend a cent constructing access for disabled wheelchair access, and now the Law requires him to spend 10,000 dollars. So, on average it has cost him 1,000 dollars a year and now he has a more civilised and welcoming diner. How many wheelchair users have not visited the diner due to lack of access is hard to assess, and you should be aware that encouraging wheelchair users to his diner would increase his profits. Whilst I am thinking of "the root of all evil" aspect, I am also thinking that disabled folks are part of our society and should be welcomed wherever we gather. For example, did you know that approximately one third of all military veterans are registered as disabled? Is your friends diner part of a land fit for heros, or just a commercial desert?
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
10 Jan 08
What a total ignorant rant! There isn't a wheelchair bound person within 100 miles of his diner. All that $10,000 did was cost him the next years' profits and NOTHING else. It was money flushed down the toilet. You can quit playing the "military veterans" card too, he is a vet and so am I, so don't stand on your soapbox as if we don't know what we're talking about, or care. If you "care" so much, would you donate $1,000 a year to an organization that helps businesses make wheelchair friendly alterations? If not, why not? Don't you "care"?"
2 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
10 Jan 08
Nuffsed: Would you support laws that force you to give your time and money for the disabled, against your will?
1 person likes this
• United States
10 Jan 08
Having easily accessible buildings is a LAW. Regardless of where you are, or how many wheelchair bound people are around your place of business, you are, required, by law to accomodate anyone that may need to enter your place of business. You may not like it, but it's the law. Thank you 504, ADA and all the other laws that have been placed upon the books. Your disability is quite different. You can easily enter buildings without a hassle. You can walk, you can go up and downstairs, you don't have to worry about relying on someone else to pull your wheelchair up stairs and everything else. You don't have to feel like a burden on the people that care for you, or just random people walking by simply because they can not easily enter a place of business. You may not like it, seems like you have some sort of personal grudge because you don't get special treatment for your disability. You are far better off than others that are wheelchair bound for the rest of their lives.
2 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
10 Jan 08
Yes, it's law, but it's also fining people without due process. It's "feel good" bull crap and the opposite of compassion, fairness and charity. Way to try to make my opinion a personal vendetta, as if my opinion is based on some kind of resentment. The fact is, I applaud any and all businesses that make accomidations for their disabled clientelle. I applaud charitible organizations that work hard to make accessibility for disabled people a reality. What I'm against is draconian bullcrap masked as compassion. If you are for these laws, but have never once volunteered a dime of your own money to help companies make their facilities more accessible, then I strongly question any compassion you've ever had at all. On the other hand, if you have donated your time, resources or money towards this, then I thank you and admire your compassion. Force is never compassion nor is it charity. In fact, it is evidence of a poplution that doesn't give a crap.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
10 Jan 08
Highflyingxangel: Would you support laws forcing you to give your time and money for the disabled, agaisnt your will?
@Modestah (11177)
• United States
9 Jan 08
I agree with you, especially in the case of small time private business owners. If the patron does not find it comfortable to use the establishment then they should by all means take their business elsewhere. I would rather see a business lend a helping hand in raising a wheel chair up over a couple small steps than to have them spend all kinds of money on ramps and such that may never get used. That shows more character. I suppose with all the regulations of the day I would probably build a ramp into my business and forgo having steps altogether - able bodied people can use a ramp, no? the private school my son went to which from kindergarten to graduate probably has less than 100 students - was made to install 2 wheel chair bathrooms within the confines of the small classrooms. This is an expense that the school will be hard pressed to meet, and again it is frivolous. one wheel chair access bathroom in a common area rather than inside the classroom should be sufficient. 1 per 100 students - all of which right now are capable of using a "normal" stall.
2 people like this
@Modestah (11177)
• United States
10 Jan 08
Good Grief! no wonder there is a huge deficit in not only humility but also charity in this world of ours!
1 person likes this
@newfette (338)
• Canada
10 Jan 08
ParaTed2k, I have to say you are brave for posting a thread like this. Kudos to you for that. It is an interesting debate. It would practically impossible to make the world accessible for someone who has a disability like yours. I have had faintings spells as well since my early 20's, dizziness, my sister has the same thing, the Dr's can't figure out why...anyhow! I understand how you can get injured from one of these faintings, and it is VERY embarrassing when you wake up on the floor and everyone is looking at you (I did it waiting in line to check in for my flight at the Montreal Airport in Quebec CAnada - one of the largest airports, if not the largest in Canada, VERY EMBARRASSING). So I do understand where you are coming from, especially in that I don't expect people to cater to my needs. Also, when you're pregnant...I just had a baby in March 2007. Man, when you are in that last trimester you almost need someone behind you pushing you up the stairs hahaha I complained to a few stores because many things were not accessible for me (low shelves in supermarkets and such) and had to keep asking for help. Chapters (a large bookstore chain in Canada I'm not sure if they are in the US) put the baby name books on the very bottom shelf. I squated down while 8 months pregnant and couldn't get back up...seriously. I had to sit down, bring my knee out front and use one knee and leg with my hand on my knee to get the leverage to get myself back up. It was ridiculous and embarrassing. So I went to the manager on the floor and showed her where they had put the babyname books and told her to do something about it. She said she would. I have no idea if they changed it or not but I hope for the sake of all the other pregnant women they did! So anyhow, accessibility is A RIGHT my friend for those who cannot walk. Making our world accessible to them is POSSIBLE, and it is AFFORDABLE. However, I do agree that your friend who has the diner should not have had to foot that bill. Larger chains, Sears or Walmart or whatever...have the money to pay for ramps and such. Small diners don't. I think they should be able to apply for subsidies to get renovations in order to be accessible to the public. So...on the one hand I agree with you that your friend shouldn't have had to pay 10 G's for the upgrade. But, I disagree with you...Help for people with special needs THAT CAN BE HELPED is a RIGHT.
2 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
10 Jan 08
That's the thing about rights, they either are, or they are not. If we say that accessibility is a "right" then accessibility must be made available for everyone. I do think making businesses accessible makes good sense where there is a market big enough to justify it, but once you make something a "right" then good sense is thrown often thrown out the window. When it comes down to it, I think it should be up to community standards, not state of federal government that decides what is best for the community. Private organizations should foot the bill for privately owned factilities. It's time we told people to put their money where their mouth is, or shut it.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
10 Jan 08
I never said "they can't help me so they shouldn't help anyone". I only brought up my own disabilities as examples. Please don't make the example the point. I'll say to you what I say to everyone who thinks the government's role is to force people to do the "right thing". It isn't charity, it is force. It is the opposite of charity. It is nothing more than a bunch of lazy people unwilling to help people themselves, so they demand the government "help". It's a pathetic and heartless society that replaces charity and compassion with force.
1 person likes this
• Italy
10 Jan 08
I agree with Newfette, accessibility is a RIGHT and if you CAN do something about it then you MUST do it. Sorry but the reasoning of "they can't help me with my problem so they shouldn't help anyone" is a bit selfish IMHO. I think if they could do something about it with laws they would have done it, but if they CAN'T then why everyone else must suffer? The problem is that governement should help with money small stores who have to put a ramp
1 person likes this
@youdontsay (3497)
• United States
9 Jan 08
I think that government buildings should all be made accessible, because there are times when it is required to enter them and do business there. And there is usually no choice about which government building to go to. I also think that sidewalks should be accessible, as there aren't choices there either. And while I personally utilize many accessible businesses, I don't know that they should be required by law to be accessible. I get rather peeved with all the "thou shalt nots" that have gone into law to mandate certain behaviors. It is just good business to be accessible. I like the idea of a bell or buzzer that would summon someone from the business to help someone get into the place if they wanted to. I've traveled to Canada, where it is not required to accomodate disabilities and found it very frustrating that I couldn't go in some places. But still, should it be a law? And if it is a law should there be financial incentives attached to it? I know that making those changes can be very expensive AND that they are tax deductible. Doesn't seem fair to small businesses.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
9 Jan 08
It isn't fair to the disabled either, since some disabilities are accomidated by mandates and others aren't.
2 people like this
@eden32 (3973)
• United States
9 Jan 08
Overall I agree with you. I owned a pet store for a few years, and ran into a similar problem for not having a ramp. Before being told I had to have a ramp, I had a regular customer who was in a wheelchair. She would call me before she came to the store and tell me what she needed, I'd gather the items, have a receipt ready & go out to her van to complete her transaction. I was a small business owner, valued her loyalty & made a way to make my products available to her- without going out of business to pay for expensive ramps & fixtures (might I add on a building I didn't own). Government can enforce on the small business owner to make these changes, but yet our currency (here in the US) is not able to be used by the blind! As I understand it, many countries have either different sized paper money or brail in the corner so blind people know what denomination is what, but not in the US. There's a reasonable accomadation that has been fought by the government for ages.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
9 Jan 08
Actually you bring up a great example of the discrimination that is inherent with any kind of mandates for accomidations. Our money isn't government currency, it is Federal Reserve notes. The government forces some businesses to accomidate the disabled, but exempts others. It also imposes requirements to accomidate some disabilities, but ignores others. You are a great example of why mandates aren't the way to go. You exercised your freedom to decide the best way to serve your valued customers.
1 person likes this
@devilsangel (1817)
• United States
10 Jan 08
I don't think private businesses should have to do things accourding to state regulations because they are privately owened. I don't think what they did to your friend was right, I think they should have left it up to his discretion, if he wanted to have a ramp or not. Given how no one in that area was even close to needing it he shouldn't have had to put it in. Now if he was a big city type place then sure, because he would be getting a variety of people comming and going. I am temporally disabled and I can understand to a point how hard it can get to go to places that aren't really set up for someone who can't get around very well. I guess I don't get as bothered because even my own place isn't really accessable to me at times.. I actually had to re-do some things in here to just be able to funtion for the time being. I don't expect the world to stop and bend to me or anyone else though.. I think its more our job to figure out how to function in a world not really made for the disabled.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
10 Jan 08
Exactly! It is up to us. I can't insist that society quit using color coding just because I can't always tell what color something is, nor should I expect everyone to. It's up to me to adapt not up to society. On the other hand, if activists see a need for business to adapt, then they should put their money where their mouths are. Start a charitible organization with that goal in mind. State and Local governments shouldn't just arbitrarily pass laws requiring adaptation. If it's that important, offer incentives to businesses that voluntarily make the alterations.
1 person likes this