What would the effects be?

January 16, 2008 8:59am CST
What do you think the effect of having Kane, Undertaker and HHH or HBK go to TNA. What do you think if three of these with either HHH or HBK went to TNA, I think it would help TNA bceome more than it is, they are all well established and famous Wrestlers in WWE, multiple time World Champions except Kane and are all Legends and fture Hall of Fmaers. What do you thinlk?
1 person likes this
11 responses
@lonewolfnan (4367)
• Canada
25 Mar 08
WHAT IF one of these 4 wrestlers went to TNA?Because of the difference in scedules,a move like this could extend a career quite a bit! If The Undertaker could wrestle only once in a while (basically become a part-time wrestler),he could fight for another 5 to 10 years!Shaun will draw crowds where-ever he goes,but his body probably does not have too much left.Triple H? IF he went,then TNA would have to bend over backwards to keep him happy as he IS a money-maker. The we come to Kane.IF he went,I feel they would have to return him to a masked wrestler to get away from being Kane.He is too well known as Undertaker's brother (I know it is just an angle) and is basically stuck in mid-to-high card.Lose the character and he still has the size and strength to become a top wrestler in a new company. If this question was asked 10 years ago,I believe that TNA would have been more interested in Shaun than the other 3. I am glad you emphasized the word "IF"
25 Mar 08
Good answer. An yeash I had to say IF, because there would obviously be people out there who thought I was actually saying that they are going, whcih they arent obviously, they are amongt the most loyal in the company.
1 person likes this
• Canada
26 Mar 08
It definately would have been interesting 10 years ago if any of them HAD gone to WCW(or back) or today's TNA
@redfang (969)
7 Feb 08
there is NO chance at all of any of these 3 going over to tna and here's why Mark Calaway ( undertaker ) thinks too highly of vince and wwe to defect, it would take a huge major upset behind the scenes for him to move out, plus he is one of the highest paid superstars on there and acording to him he has paid off everything and is now wrestling for his own enjoyment and that of the fans so he's sitting pretty. Shawn michaels will not defect because he has a stake in wwe somewhere ( i forget where though ) he's too much of a company man to go over to tna. hunter will not go over to tna becuase he is part of the family now, he is one of the main writers for raw and he is highly paid so why on earth would he go over to tna, he has the possibility of becoming a major player in the running of the company in years to come when steph and shane take over from vince, nahh he's sitting pretty there so not a chance in the world. As for Kane, wellll this owuld be interesting if he went to TNA BUT they already have abyss there who is really the Kane equal in the way they portray him in TNA, i also think Kane is more of a WWE company person as well so i don't think much chance of him going over to TNA BUTTTTT one person i would love to see defect would beeeeeee The Samoan submission machine Samoa Joe, i would love to see him go over to WWE though i don't know how well he would be welcomed because of how monty brown was used when he defected over to WWE from TNA, i think though he would be a great addition to WWE if he was used right in the first place and not put in as some second rate star like brown was. just my thoughts anyway.
@redfang (969)
7 Feb 08
sorry for tripple post the site messed up.
8 Feb 08
ok, but I didnt say thet were, Iwas asking What If?
@bumba1988 (1222)
• India
14 Jul 08
WWE will go into oblivion.It will be finished my dear and I cannot think of WWE without these three.
@elmiko (6637)
• United States
5 May 08
I could see kane possibly going to TNA. If HHH went I guess he would be divorced from stephonie. The Undertaker will definitely retire before going to TNA. HBK has been wrestling for wwe longer than anybody who still is so he will retire also in wwe.
@mefadon3 (298)
• United States
16 Apr 08
TNA is already a good rival to the WWE. I don't think they have the money to pay all of them, but if they wanted to take a pay cut and go to the TNA. Then you would see more people tuning in to watch them than them going to watch wwe.
@babostwick (2037)
• United States
15 Apr 08
I don't know if it would help or hurt TNA because based on my observation, no matter who gets brought in, the ratings tend to stay the same. I don't know if it would really give them a boost but it would be interesting to say the least. If they left, they probably most likely would have to use new names or something to that effect. On the other hand, the only thing it might hurt or enhance is the reputation of TNA hiring former WWE wrestlers and some may not like it so much.
• Dominican Republic
8 Feb 08
the effect would b........tna would get most popular n better than wwe...... but i just wanna tell u something.......WWE 4 Ever!!!!
@redfang (969)
7 Feb 08
there is NO chance at all of any of these 3 going over to tna and here's why Mark Calaway ( undertaker ) thinks too highly of vince and wwe to defect, it would take a huge major upset behind the scenes for him to move out, plus he is one of the highest paid superstars on there and acording to him he has paid off everything and is now wrestling for his own enjoyment and that of the fans so he's sitting pretty. Shawn michaels will not defect because he has a stake in wwe somewhere ( i forget where though ) he's too much of a company man to go over to tna. hunter will not go over to tna becuase he is part of the family now, he is one of the main writers for raw and he is highly paid so why on earth would he go over to tna, he has the possibility of becoming a major player in the running of the company in years to come when steph and shane take over from vince, nahh he's sitting pretty there so not a chance in the world. As for Kane, wellll this owuld be interesting if he went to TNA BUT they already have abyss there who is really the Kane equal in the way they portray him in TNA, i also think Kane is more of a WWE company person as well so i don't think much chance of him going over to TNA BUTTTTT one person i would love to see defect would beeeeeee The Samoan submission machine Samoa Joe, i would love to see him go over to WWE though i don't know how well he would be welcomed because of how monty brown was used when he defected over to WWE from TNA, i think though he would be a great addition to WWE if he was used right in the first place and not put in as some second rate star like brown was. just my thoughts anyway.
@redfang (969)
7 Feb 08
there is NO chance at all of any of these 3 going over to tna and here's why Mark Calaway ( undertaker ) thinks too highly of vince and wwe to defect, it would take a huge major upset behind the scenes for him to move out, plus he is one of the highest paid superstars on there and acording to him he has paid off everything and is now wrestling for his own enjoyment and that of the fans so he's sitting pretty. Shawn michaels will not defect because he has a stake in wwe somewhere ( i forget where though ) he's too much of a company man to go over to tna. hunter will not go over to tna becuase he is part of the family now, he is one of the main writers for raw and he is highly paid so why on earth would he go over to tna, he has the possibility of becoming a major player in the running of the company in years to come when steph and shane take over from vince, nahh he's sitting pretty there so not a chance in the world. As for Kane, wellll this owuld be interesting if he went to TNA BUT they already have abyss there who is really the Kane equal in the way they portray him in TNA, i also think Kane is more of a WWE company person as well so i don't think much chance of him going over to TNA BUTTTTT one person i would love to see defect would beeeeeee The Samoan submission machine Samoa Joe, i would love to see him go over to WWE though i don't know how well he would be welcomed because of how monty brown was used when he defected over to WWE from TNA, i think though he would be a great addition to WWE if he was used right in the first place and not put in as some second rate star like brown was. just my thoughts anyway.
@Kenorv (344)
• United States
19 Jan 08
I think that TNA needs to focus on developing their own talent and not worry about taking guys that are already established in the WWE. It's one thing to bring in a guy like Christian because he was being held back in the WWE but it's something totally different to bring in a top level guy like HHH or HBK. Kurt Angle was a unique cirmunstance. The WWE wanted him to take time off to get treated for his addiction to pain meds and he decided to just leave and get out of his contract and sign with TNA instead. But other than those two I don't think that TNA should be going after WWE talent. I think they have a lot of good talent of their own that they need to figure out how to develop.
16 Jan 08
TNA is already more exciting than WWE. It lost it's magic for me long ago, although i still enjoy it. I'm not finding myself going "Oh who will win the title" or looking forward to see dvds of the events. TNA, seems to do this. I've caught two events and one main and I'm glued. It pretty much is different yet still remains the classic type wwe had long ago. ~Joey P.s for more famous wrestlers in tna would be a good thing, although they don't need to gain to many. (instead brand there own)