Pythons and other large snakes may become illegal
By oscarbartoni
@oscarbartoni (2581)
United States
February 1, 2008 3:06pm CST
I found this on a Yahoo group that I belong to and thought that I would share it with you.
Deadline for comments is Apr. 30 - non-US comments are accepted
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 16
[FWS-R9-FHC-2008-0015; 94410-1342-0000-N3] RIN 1018-AV68 Injurious
Wildlife Species; Review of Information Concerning Constrictor Snakes
From Python, Boa, and Eunectes genera AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of inquiry.
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service or We), are
reviewing available biological and economic information on constrictor
snakes in the Python, Boa and Eunectes genera for possible addition to
the list of injurious wildlife under the Lacey Act. The importation and
introduction of constrictor snakes into the natural ecosystems of the
United States may [[Page 5785]] pose a threat to the interests of
agriculture, horticulture, forestry; to the health and welfare of human
beings; and to the welfare and survival of wildlife and wildlife
resources in the United States. An injurious wildlife listing would
prohibit the importation into, or transportation between, States, the
District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any territory
or possession of the United States by any means, without a permit.
Permits may be issued for scientific, medical, educational, or zoological
purposes. This document seeks comments from the public to aid in
determining if a proposed rule is warranted.
DATES: We will accept comments received or postmarked on or before April
30, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments. U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public
Comments Processing, Attn: RIN 1018-AV68, Division of Policy and
Directives Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 4401 North Fairfax
Drive, Suite 222, Arlington, VA 22203. Instructions: We will not accept
e-mail or faxes. We will post all comments on http://www.regulations.gov.
This generally means that we will post any personal information you
provide us (see the Public Comments section below for more information).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin Williams, Branch of Invasive
Species at (703) 358-2034 or erin_williams@....
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 21, 2006, we received a petition
from the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) requesting that
Burmese pythons be considered for inclusion in the injurious wildlife
regulations pursuant to the Lacey Act (18 U.S.C. 42). SFWMD is concerned
about the number of Burmese pythons found in Florida, particularly in the
Everglades National Park. We are looking at obtaining information on
constrictor species in the Python, Boa and Eunectes genera for possible
addition to the injurious wildlife list under the Lacey Act. The
regulations contained in 50 CFR part 16 implement the Lacey Act, as
amended. Under the terms of the injurious wildlife provisions of the
Lacey Act, the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to prohibit the
importation and interstate transportation of species designated by the
Secretary as injurious. Injurious wildlife are those species, offspring,
and eggs that are injurious or potentially injurious to wildlife and
wildlife resources, to human beings, and to the interests of forestry,
horticulture, or agriculture of the United States. Wild mammals, wild
birds, fish, mollusks, crustaceans, amphibians, and reptiles are the only
organisms that can be added to the injurious wildlife list. The lists of
injurious wildlife are at 50 CFR 16.11-16.15. If the process initiated by
this notice results in the addition of a species to the list of injurious
wildlife contained in 50 CFR part 16, their importation into or
transportation between States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth
of Puerto Rico, or any territory or possession of the United States would
be prohibited, except by permit for zoological, educational, medical, or
scientific purposes (in accordance with permit regulations at 50 CFR
16.22), or by Federal agencies without a permit solely for their own use.
Public Comments This notice of inquiry solicits biological, economic, or
other data on adding species in the Python, Boa and Eunectes genera to
the list of injurious wildlife. This information, along with other
sources of data, will be used to determine if these species are a threat,
or potential threat, to those interests of the United States delineated
above, and thus warrant addition to the list of injurious reptiles in 50
CFR 16.15. You may submit your comments and materials concerning this
notice of inquiry by one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section.
We will not accept comments sent by e-mail or fax or to an address not
listed in the ADDRESSES section. We will not accept anonymous comments;
your comment must include your first and last name, city, State, country,
and postal (zip) code. Finally, we will not consider hand- delivered
comments that we do not receive, or mailed comments that are not
postmarked, by the date specified in the DATES section. We will post your
entire comment--including your personal identifying information--on
http://www.regulations.gov. If you provide personal identifying
information in addition to the required items specified in the previous
paragraph, such as your street address, phone number, or e-mail address,
you may request at the top of your document that we withhold this
information from public review. However, we cannot guarantee that we will
be able to do so. Comments and materials we receive, as well as
supporting documentation we used in preparing this notice of inquiry,
will be available for public inspection on http://www.regulations.gov, or
by appointment, during normal business hours, at the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22203.
We are soliciting public comments and supporting data to gain additional
information and specifically seek comment on the following questions: (1)
What regulations does your State have pertaining to the use, transport,
or production of Python, Boa and Eunectes genera? (2) How many species in
the Python, Boa and Eunectes genera are currently in production for
wholesale or retail sale, and in how many and which States? (3) How many
businesses sell Python, Boa or Eunectes species? (4) How many businesses
breed Python, Boa or Eunectes species? (5) What are the annual sales for
Python, Boa or Eunectes species? (6) Please provide the number of Python,
Boa or Eunectes species, if any, permitted within each State. (7) What
would it cost to eradicate Python, Boa or Eunectes individuals or
populations, or similar species, if found? (8) What are the costs of
implementing propagation, recovery, and restoration programs for native
species that are affected by Python, Boa or Eunectes species, or similar
snake species? (9) What State-listed species would be impacted by the
introduction of Python, Boa or Eunectes species? (10) What species have
been impacted, and how, by Python, Boa or Eunectes species?
2 responses
@lovespecialangel (3632)
• United States
1 Feb 08
What does this mean for those who currently own a python. I own a ball python and do not want to have to get rid of him. I really don't understand why they are wanting to do this.
1 person likes this
@oscarbartoni (2581)
• United States
1 Feb 08
You need to read the whole article and then give your commits to where it says to give them. You d have a voice in this. I just do not wish for this to be like the snakehead fish that were banned form the United States after the dangerous one got established. Now not only the dangerous ones are illegal but the small non dangerous ones are as well. There are some Northern snakeheads that are living in the United States and they are a problem because they do get large and they can live through the winter but most snakehead fish are warmth loving fish and could not survive through the winter in Northern States.
@cynicalandoutspoken (4725)
• United States
1 Feb 08
I would be upset. I used to own plenty of pythons. If this gets passed and I could no longer go to a pet store and buy one of these snakes it would anger me.
1 person likes this
@oscarbartoni (2581)
• United States
1 Feb 08
The loophole that I see is if the snakes are bred in the state where they are going to be sold then it might be legal. You should try and put some comets as to your position on this matter.



